Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Economic comparison of unenriched and alternative cage systems used in laying hen husbandry - recent experience under Turkish commercial conditions

  • Y. ARAL (a1), M.S. ARIKAN (a1), E.E. ONBASILAR (a2), N. UNAL (a2), A. GOKDAI (a1) and E. ERDEM (a3)...

This review provides a comparative analysis on the unenriched and alternative cage systems used in commercial egg production as required by the directive (99/74/EC) of the EU Council on animal welfare in terms of technical performance indicators, distribution of cost items, egg sales revenue, and profitability. Unenriched (conventional) cages are commonly used in Turkey. However these cages don't provide for the laying hens natural needs. The comparison was taken from data regarding Lohmann Brown Classic and Lohmann LSL Classic laying hybrids kept in two caging systems. The rearing period was composed of 399 days starting when 16-week-old commercial pullets were put into unenriched and alternative cage systems and ending at the end of their 73rd weeks of age when laying hens were removed from production. The average shares of the some important cost items in the total cost in the production period were calculated to be as follows for unenriched and alternative cage systems, respectively: pullet 22.17% and 21.17%; feed 61.31% and 58.29%; labour 2.67% and 2.55%; veterinary and health 0.74% and 0.98%; egg packaging 3.23% and 3.48%; maintenance and repair expenses 1.50% and 2.29%; and depreciation costs 5.48% and 8.35%. The average cost of producing one egg was found to be 0.094 US$ and 0.097 US$, respectively. It was determined that investment costs in alternative cage systems was 14.93% higher and the production cost per hen was 2.03% higher than that in unenriched cage systems. In Turkey, on January 1, 2023, all systems will be converted to alternative cages. Investment amounts and production costs for the alternative cage systems are very important in this transformation process. Therefore the present review is to examine the available information on the production data of laying hens reared in the unenriched and alternative cages and to make economic feasibility conclusions under Turkey conditions.

Corresponding author
Corresponding author:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. ABRAHAMSSON and R. TAUSON (1995a) Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens: Effects on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A-Animal Sciences 45: 191-203.

P. ABRAHAMSSON , R. TAUSON and M.C. APPLEBY (1995b) Performance of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A-Animal Sciences 45: 286-296.

H.J. BLOKHUIS , T. FIKS-VAN NIEKERK , W. BESSEI , A. ELSON , D. GUÉMENÉ , J.B. KJAER and H.A. VAN DE WEERD (2007) The LayWel project: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World's Poultry Science Journal 63: 101-114.

E. GOCSIK , A.O. LANSINK , G. VOERMANS and H.W. SAATKAMP (2015) Economic feasibility of animal welfare improvements in Dutch intensive livestock production: A comparison between broiler, laying hen, and fattening pig sectors. Livestock Science 182: 38-53.

V. GUESDON and J.M. FAURE (2004) Laying performance and egg quality in hens kept in standard or furnished cages. Animal Research 53: 45-57.

D.C. LAY , R.M. FULTON , P.Y. HESTER , D.M. KARCHER , J.B. KJAER , J.A. MENCH , B.A. MULLEN , R.C. NEWBERRY , C.J. NICOL , N.P.O. SULLIVAN and R.E. PORTER (2011) Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poultry Science 90: 278-294.

W.A. MATTHEWS and D.A. SUMNER (2015) Effects of housing system on the costs of commercial egg production. Poultry Science 94: 552-557.

E.E. ONBASILAR , N. UNAL , E. ERDEM , A. KOCAKAYA and B. YARANOGLU (2015) Production performance, use of nest box, and external appearance of two strains of laying hens kept in conventional and enriched cages. Poultry Science 94: 559-564.

R. SINGH , K.M. CHENG and F.G. SILVERSIDES (2009) Production performance and egg quality of four strains of laying hens kept in conventional cages and floor pens . Poultry Science 88: 256-264.

R. TAUSON (2005) Management and housing systems for layers-effects on welfare and production. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 477-490.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World's Poultry Science Journal
  • ISSN: 0043-9339
  • EISSN: 1743-4777
  • URL: /core/journals/world-s-poultry-science-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 56 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 312 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th January 2017 - 23rd August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.