Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Canada–Renewable Energy: Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So-Green Subsidies

  • STEVE CHARNOVITZ (a1) and CAROLYN FISCHER (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

In the first dispute on renewable energy to come to WTO dispute settlement, the domestic content requirement of Ontario's feed-in tariff was challenged as a discriminatory investment-related measure and as a prohibited import substitution subsidy. The Panel and Appellate Body agreed that Canada was violating the GATT and the TRIMS Agreement. But the SCM Article 3 claim by Japan and the European Union remains unadjudicated, because neither tribunal made a finding that the price guaranteed for electricity from renewable sources constitutes a ‘benefit’ pursuant to the SCM Agreement. Although the Appellate Body provides useful guidance to future Panels on how the existence of a benefit could be calculated, the most noteworthy aspect of the new jurisprudence is the Appellate Body's reasoning that delineating the proper market for ‘benefit’ analysis entails respect for the policy choices made by a government. Thus, in this dispute, the proper market is electricity produced only from wind and solar energy.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email:scharnovitz@law.gwu.edu.
**Email:Fischer@rff.org.
References
Hide All
Auditor General of Ontario (2011), ‘Electricity Sector ‒ Renewable Energy Initiatives’, 2011 Annual Report of the Auditor General of Ontario, Chapter 3, Section 3.03.
Buen J. (2006), ‘Danish and Norwegian Wind Industry: The Relationship between Policy Instruments, Innovation and Diffusion’, Energy Policy, 34(18): 38873897.
Casier L., Fraser R., Halle M., and Wolfe R. (2014), ‘Shining a Light on Fossil Fuel Subsidies at the WTO: How NGOs Can Contribute to WTO Notification and Surveillance’, World Trade Review, 13(4): 603632.
Charnovitz S. (2002), ‘The Law of Environmental “PPMs” in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’, Yale Journal of International Law, 27(1): 59110.
Cosbey A. and Mavroidis P. C. (2014), ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: The Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 17: 1147.
Couture T. D., Cory K., Kreycik C., and Williams E. (2010), A Policymaker's Guide to Feed-In Tariff Policy Design, Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-44849 (July 2010), Washington, DC: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2014), ‘Electricity Trade’, Annual Energy Outlook 2014, Washington, DC: EIA, Table A10.
EU (European Union) (2009a), Climate Action. Europa: Gateway to the European Union, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/climate_action.htm (accessed 5 March 2010).
EU (European Union) (2009b), Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0016:0062:EN:PDF (accessed 5 March 2010).
Fischer C. (2010), ‘When Do Renewable Portfolio Standards Lower Electricity Prices?’, The Energy Journal, 31(1): 101120.
Fischer C., Greaker M., and Rosendahl K. E. (2014), Robust Policies against Emission Leakage: The Case for Upstream Subsidies, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4742.
Fischer C. and Newell R. G. (2008), ‘Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(2): 142162.
Fischer C., Newell R., and Preonas L. (2013), Environmental and Technology Policy Options in the Electricity Sector: Interactions and Outcomes, Discussion Paper 13-20, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Fischer C. and Preonas L. (2010), ‘Combining Policies for Renewable Energy: Is the Whole Less Than the Sum of Its Parts?’, International Review of Energy and Resource Economics, 4(1): 5192.
Fischer C. and Salant S. (2014), Limits to Limiting Emissions: Spatial Leakage, Intertemporal Leakage, and Negative Leakage, Working Paper, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Flood B. (2014), ‘US Brings WTO Case against Indian Solar Program’, Bloomberg BNA Daily Report for Executives, 28 May 2014.
Griffin S. (2013), ‘The World Trade Organization: A Barrier to Green Energy’, Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems, 22: 205226.
Hestermeyer H. P. and Nielsen L. (2014), ‘The Legality of Local Content Measures under WTO Law’, Journal of World Trade, 48: 553591.
Huberty M., Gao H., Mandell J., and Zysman J. (2011), Shaping the Green Growth Economy: A Review of the Public Debate and the Prospects for Green Growth, Preliminary version (31 March 2011), Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013), CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion: Highlights, Paris: IEA.
Kammen D. M., Kapadia K., and Fripp M. (2004), Putting Renewables to Work: How Many Jobs Can the Clean Energy Industry Generate? RAEL Report, Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Lecuyer O. and Fischer C. (2014), Can a Tariff for Renewable Energy Financed by a Consumer Tax Reduce Electricity Prices? Analysing Interactions with an Emission Cap, Working Paper, Bern, Switzerland: University of Bern.
Ministry of Energy (2010), Ontario Delivers $7 Billion Green Investment, http://news.ontario.ca/mei/en/2010/01/backgrounder-20100121.html (accessed 31 August 2014).
Nath I. (2010), ‘Cleaning Up after Clean Energy: Hazardous Waste in the Solar Industry’, Stanford Journal of International Relations, 11(2): 615.
Navigant Consulting (2012), Sector Profile for Solar Photovoltaics in Canada, Report 2012-063 (RP-TEC), CanmetENERGY, Natural Resources Canada, March 2012, http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/.ca/files/canmetenergy/files/pubs/2012-063-eng.pdf (accessed 31 August 2014).
Neven D. and Sykes A. (2014), ‘United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint): Some Comments’, World Trade Review, 13: 281298.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2011), Joint Working Party on Trade and Environment, Domestic Incentive Measures for Renewable Energy with Possible Trade Implications, COM/TAD/ENV/JWPTE(2011)46, Paris: OECD.
Pal R. (2014), ‘Has the Appellate Body's Decision in Canada – Renewable Energy/Canada – Feed-In Tariff Program Opened the Door for Production Subsidies?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 17: 125137.
REN21 (Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century) (2013), Renewables 2013 Global Status Report, Paris: REN21 Secretariat.
Rubini L. (2014), ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly’, Journal of World Trade, 48(5): 895938.
Schmidt R. C. and Marschinski R. (2009), ‘A Model of Technological Breakthrough in the Renewable Energy Sector’, Ecological Economics, 69(2): 435444.
Shadikhodjaev S. (2013), ‘First Judicial Review of Climate Change Subsidy Issues’, American Journal of International Law, 107(4): 864878.
Sharp B. (2013), ‘Blame Solar for Sky-High Ontario Power Bills’, Financial Post, 29 October.
Sorrell S. (2003), ‘Who Owns the Carbon? Interactions between the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the UK Renewables Obligation and Energy Efficiency Commitment’, Energy and Environment, 14(5): 677703.
Sorrell S., and Sijm J. (2003), ‘Carbon Trading in the Policy Mix’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(3): 420437.
van Benthem A., Gillingham K., and Sweeney J. (2008), ‘Learning-by-Doing and the Optimal Solar Policy in California’, Energy Journal, 29(3): 131151.
Whitsitt E. (2013), ‘A Modest Victory at the WTO for Ontario's FIT Program’, University of California at Davis Journal of International Law and Policy, 20: 75103.
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2013), ‘Minutes of Meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard on 24 May 2013’, WT/DSB/M/332, 31 July 2013.
World Trade Organization (WTO) (2014), Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Replies to Questions Posed by India to the United States, G/SCM/Q2/USA/61, Geneva: WTO.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 195 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 783 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.