Skip to main content
×
Home

EC – Bed: Linen European Communities – Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India*

Abstract

As comprehensively argued elsewhere in this volume,1 the WTO's antidumping provisions reflect political compromises that mask an underlying lack of consensus on the value and purpose of an antidumping regime at the national level. This is an old story that has been long argued in academic and policy circles. What is noteworthy recently is the significant increase in the use of trade remedies, especially by developing economies. As a result, while the post-Uruguay Round period is generally marked by greater economic openness resulting from various forms of trade liberalization, the use of trade remedies is no longer primarily the province of OECD economies. Indeed, the introduction and use of trade remedies is proliferating around the world.2

Copyright
References
Hide All
Bagwell Kyle and Staiger Robert W.. 2002. The Economics of the World Trading System. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Bagwell Kyle and Staiger Robert W.. Forthcoming. Multilateral trade negotiations, bilateral opportunism, and the rules of GATT/WTO. Journal of International Economics.
Ethier Wilfred. J. 2002. Political externalities, non-discrimination, and a multilateral world. PIER Working Paper no. 02–030, September.
Horlick Gary N. and Clark Peggy A.. 1997. Standards for Panels Reviewing Antidumping Determinations under the GATT and WTO, in Petersham E., ed., International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Dordrecht: Kluwer, at p. 313.
Horn Henrik and Mavroidis Petros. 2001. Economic and legal aspects of the Most-Favored Nation clause. European Journal of Political Economy 17, 233–79.
Jackson John H. 1969. World Trade and the Law of GATT. Bobbs Meredith, pp. 401–24.
McNellis Natalie. 2002. What obligations are created by WTO Dispute Settlement Reports? World Trade Forum, August.
Prusa Thomas A. 2001. On the spread of antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34: 591611.
Rosenthal Paul and Vermylen Robert T. C.. 2000. Review of key substantive agreements: Panel IIE: Antidumping Agreement and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. 31 Law and Policy International Business:871.
Shin Hyun Ja. 1998. Possible instances of predatory pricing in recent antidumping cases, in Lawrence Robert Z., ed., Brookings Trade Forum, pp. 8198.
Staiger Robert W. and Wolak Frank A.. 1994. Measuring industry-specific protection. Brookings papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 51103.
Stewart Terrence. 1993. The GATT Uruguay Round: a Negotiating History, Dordrecht: Kluwer, vol. 2, p. 1.
Vermulst E. and Graafsma . 2001. WTO dispute settlement with respect to trade contingency measures. Journal of World Trade 35 (2): 209–28.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 307 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 14th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.