Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-w5x57 Total loading time: 0.207 Render date: 2022-07-01T17:12:42.375Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

EC – Bed: Linen European Communities – Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Extract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As comprehensively argued elsewhere in this volume,1 the WTO's antidumping provisions reflect political compromises that mask an underlying lack of consensus on the value and purpose of an antidumping regime at the national level. This is an old story that has been long argued in academic and policy circles. What is noteworthy recently is the significant increase in the use of trade remedies, especially by developing economies. As a result, while the post-Uruguay Round period is generally marked by greater economic openness resulting from various forms of trade liberalization, the use of trade remedies is no longer primarily the province of OECD economies. Indeed, the introduction and use of trade remedies is proliferating around the world.2

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

References

Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W.. 2002. The Economics of the World Trading System. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W.. Forthcoming. Multilateral trade negotiations, bilateral opportunism, and the rules of GATT/WTO. Journal of International Economics.Google Scholar
Ethier, Wilfred. J. 2002. Political externalities, non-discrimination, and a multilateral world. PIER Working Paper no. 02–030, September.Google Scholar
Horlick, Gary N. and Clark, Peggy A.. 1997. Standards for Panels Reviewing Antidumping Determinations under the GATT and WTO, in Petersham, E., ed., International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, Dordrecht: Kluwer, at p. 313.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros. 2001. Economic and legal aspects of the Most-Favored Nation clause. European Journal of Political Economy 17, 233–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John H. 1969. World Trade and the Law of GATT. Bobbs Meredith, pp. 401–24.Google Scholar
McNellis, Natalie. 2002. What obligations are created by WTO Dispute Settlement Reports? World Trade Forum, August.Google Scholar
Prusa, Thomas A. 2001. On the spread of antidumping. Canadian Journal of Economics, 34: 591611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Paul and Vermylen, Robert T. C.. 2000. Review of key substantive agreements: Panel IIE: Antidumping Agreement and Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. 31 Law and Policy International Business:871.Google Scholar
Shin, Hyun Ja. 1998. Possible instances of predatory pricing in recent antidumping cases, in Lawrence, Robert Z., ed., Brookings Trade Forum, pp. 8198.Google Scholar
Staiger, Robert W. and Wolak, Frank A.. 1994. Measuring industry-specific protection. Brookings papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 51103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Terrence. 1993. The GATT Uruguay Round: a Negotiating History, Dordrecht: Kluwer, vol. 2, p. 1.Google Scholar
Vermulst, E. and Graafsma, . 2001. WTO dispute settlement with respect to trade contingency measures. Journal of World Trade 35 (2): 209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have Access

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

EC – Bed: Linen European Communities – Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India*
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

EC – Bed: Linen European Communities – Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India*
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

EC – Bed: Linen European Communities – Anti-dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *