Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Mexico – Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services (WT/DS204/R) A Comment on “El mess in TELMEX”

  • Damien J. Neven (a1) and Petros C. Mavroidis (a2)
Abstract

This chapter reviews the panel report on Mexico – Measures Affecting Telecommunication Services. The Panel considered claims by the United States that Mexico acted inconsistently with its obligations in respect to the liberalization of its market for telecommunication services. It is the first Panel to consider solely the rules agreed upon in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). It is also the first Panel to deal with the telecommunication services industry and its complex layers of legislation, in particular the rules agreed to in the Telecommunications Reference Paper (TRP) on pro-competitive regulatory principles. Viewed from this perspective, this report is, because of its potential as a precedent, of particular significance.

Copyright
References
Hide All
M Armstrong. (2002). The theory of access pricing and interconnection, In The Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Caves , et al., eds. Chapter 8 Vol. 1., Elsevier Science: North Holland, pp. 295384.
M Bronckers. and P Larouche. (2005). The GATS Mimeo.
E Fox. (2002). What is harm to competition? Exclusionary practices and anticompetitive effects, Antitrust Law Journal, 70: 371413.
J Hausman. (2002). Mobile Telephone. In Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Caves , et al., eds. Vol. 1, Elsevier Science: North Holland, pp. 563604.
B Hoekman., Messerlin P. and P.C Mavroidis. (1998). Regulation, competition policyand market access negotiations: lessons from the telecommunications sector. In Competition and Trade Policies, Einar Hope ed. Routledge: New York, pp. 115139.
F Jenny. (2003). International Cooperation on competition: myth, reality, and perspective, Antitrust Bulletin, 48: 9731003.
J.-J Laffont. (1998). Competition, information and development, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, pp. 237268.
P Mardsen. (2004). Trade and competition. WTO decides first competition case — with disappointing results, Competition Law Insight, 16(3), pp. 39.
P.C Mavroidis. and D.J Neven. (2000). The WTO agreement on telecommunications: it’s never too late. In The Liberalization of State Monopolies in the European Union and Beyond, Geradin D., ed. Kluwer: London, pp. 307318.
G Sidak. and Singer H.. (2004). Überregulation without economics: the world trade organization’s decision in the US-Mexico arbitration on telecommunication services Mimeo.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 279 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.