Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Panel Report on EC–IT Products

  • PAOLA CONCONI (a1) and ROBERT HOWSE (a2)
Abstract

At the heart of the dispute on EC–IT Products1 is the definition of information-technology (IT) products and the question of how to treat increasingly multifunctional high-tech goods. The dispute was triggered by various measures introduced by the European Union, resulting in the imposition of duties of up to 14% pertaining to the tariff treatment of certain multifunctional IT products. The complaining parties (the United States, along with Japan and Taiwan) argued that, by introducing these duties, the EU had violated the 1996 Information Technology Agreement (ITA). The WTO Panel Report, circulated on 16 August 2010, ruled in favor of the complaining parties, and ordered the EU to repeal the measures leading to the dutiable treatment of the products at stake. We argue that the Panel's ruling enhances the credibility of trade-policy liberalization in the high-tech sector, fostering the development of new technologies.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Panel Report on EC–IT Products
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Panel Report on EC–IT Products
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Panel Report on EC–IT Products
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: pconconi@ulb.ac.be
**Email: howserob@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Aghion, Philippe and Howitt, Peter (2009), The Economics of Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962), ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in Nelson, Richard R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Report of the National Bureau of Economic Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 609625.
Baldwin, Robert E. and Magee, Christopher S. (2000), ‘Is Trade Policy for Sale? Congressional Voting on Recent Trade Bills’, Public Choice, 105 (1–2): 79101.
Ben-David, Dan (1993), ‘Equalizing Exchange: Trade Liberalization and Income Convergence’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 653679.
Bernard, Andrew B., Eaton, Jonathan, Bradford Jensen, J., and Kortum, Samuel S. (2003), ‘Plants and Productivity in International Trade’, The American Economic Review, 93(4): 12681290.
Blonigen, Bruce A. and Figlio, David N. (1998), ‘Voting for Protection: Does Direct Foreign Investment Influence Legislator Behavior?’, The American Economic Review, 88(4): 10021014.
Broda, Christian, and Weinstein, David E. (2006), ‘Globalization and the Gains from Variety’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2): 541585.
Bustos, Paula (2011), ‘Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms’, The American Economic Review, 101(1): 304340.
Conconi, Paola, and Perroni, Carlo (2009), ‘Do Credible Domestic Institutions Promote Credible International Agreements?’, Journal of International Economics, 79(1): 160170.
Conconi, Paola, Facchini, Giovanni, and Zanardi, Maurizio (2011), ‘Policymakers’ Horizon and Trade Reforms’, CEPR Discussion Paper 8561.
Dreyer, Iana and Hindley, Brian (2008), ‘Trade in Information Technology Goods: Adapting the ITA to 21st Century Technological Change’, European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) Working Paper No. 06/2008.
Edwards, Sebastian (1998), ‘Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?’, The Economic Journal, 108(447): 383398.
Feenstra, Robert C., Mandel, Benjamin R., Reinsdorf, Marshall B., and Slaughter, Matthew J. (2009), ‘Effects of Terms of Trade Gains and Tariff Changes on the Measurement of US Productivity Growth’, NBER Working Paper No. 15592.
Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou and Maggi, Giovanni (1999), ‘Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation’, The American Economic Review, 89(5): 11351155.
Horn, Henrik and Howse, Robert (2008), ‘European Communities – Customs Classification of Frozen Boneless Chicken Cuts’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The American Law Institute: The WTO Case Law of 2004–2005: Legal and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 938.
Horn, Henrik and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (2005), ‘European Communities – Trade Description of Sardines: Textualism and its Discontent’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2002: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248275.
Howse, Robert and Staiger, Robert W. (2006), ‘United States – Sunset Review of Anti-Dumping Duties on Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products From Japan (AB-2003-5, WT/DS244/AB/R): A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Appellate Body Ruling’, in Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (eds.), The WTO Case Law of 2003: The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3151.
Howse, Robert and van Bork, Petrus B. (2006), ‘Options for Liberalizing Trade in Environmental Goods in the Doha Round’, ICTSD Trade and Environment Series Issue Paper No. 2, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jenkins, Henry (2006), Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York: New York University Press.
Krugman, Paul R. (1979), ‘Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 9(4): 469479.
Maggi, Giovanni and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés (1998), ‘The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures’, Journal of Political Economy, 106(3): 574601.
Maggi, Giovanni and Rodríguez-Clare, Andrés (2007), ‘A Political-Economy Theory of Trade Agreements’, The American Economic Review, 97(4): 13741406.
Matsuyama, Kiminori (1990), ‘Perfect Equilibria in a Trade Liberalization Game’, The American Economic Review, 80(3): 480492.
Melitz, Marc J. (2003), ‘The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity’, Econometrica, 71(6): 16951725.
Miyagiwa, Kaz and Ohno, Yuka (1999), ‘Credibility of Protection and Incentives to Innovate’, International Economic Review, 40(1): 143163.
Pavcnik, Nina (2002), ‘Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants’, The Review of Economic Studies, 69(1): 245276.
Rodríguez, Francisco and Rodrik, Dani (2001), ‘Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence’, Bernanke, Ben and Rogoff, Kenneth S. (eds.), Macroeconomics Annual 2000, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press for NBER, pp. 261338.
Sachs, Jeffrey D. and Warner, Andrew (1995), ‘Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, (1): 1118.
Staiger, Robert W. and Tabellini, Guido (1987), ‘Discretionary Trade Policy and Excessive Protection’, The American Economic Review, 77(5): 823837.
Trefler, Daniel (2004), ‘The Long and Short of the Canada−US Free Trade Agreement’, The American Economic Review, 94(4): 870–895.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 43 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 476 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.