Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Regulatory Differences in the Approval of GMOs: Extent and Development over Time

  • ROSANE NUNES DE FARIA (a1) and CHRISTINE WIECK (a2)
Abstract

Considering the regulatory approval developments for cotton, maize, and soybean within the time period 2000–2013, this paper assesses the extent of asymmetry in the authorizations of new genetically modified organism (GMO) events between importing and exporting countries. The results show an increase in the asynchronous approval across the majority of country pairs. However, focusing only on commercialized events and considering only regulatory approval differences in which the importers are more stringent than the exporters, the asynchronous approval is considerably lower, and the result indicates that the major trade leaders have synchronized their approval status for GMOs over time. Some countries, such as Norway, Switzerland, Thailand, and Turkey seem to face the highest potential for trade disruption, while the opposite holds for Japan and South Korea.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Email: rnfaria@ufscar.br
**Email: christine.wieck@ilr.uni-bonn.de
References
Hide All
Backus, G. B. C., Berkholt, P., Eaton, D. J. F., Franke, L., de Kleijn, A. J., Lotz, B., van Mil, E. M., Roza, P., and Uffelmann, W. (2008), EU Policy on GMOs: A Quick Scan on the Economic Consequences, LEI Report 2008-070, The Hague: Wageningen University and Research Centre.
Berwald, D., Carter, C. A., and Gruère, G. P. (2006), ‘Rejecting New Technology: The Case of Genetically Modified Wheat’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(2): 432447.
Burnquist, H. L., Souza, M. J. P., Faria, R. N., Rau, M. L., and Shutes, K. (2012), ‘A Systematic Approach to Regulatory Heterogeneity Applied to EU Agri-Food Trade’, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 18–24 August 2012.
BIO (2013), Biotradestatus Website Database for the Regulatory and Market Status of Certain Agricultural Biotechnology Products, http://www.biotradestatus.com/default.cfm (accessed November 2013).
Carter, C. and Smith, A. (2007), ‘Estimating the Market Effect of a Food Scare: The Case of Genetically Modified Starlink Corn’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3): 552553.
Center for Environmental Risk Assessment (CERA) (2012), ‘GM Crop Database’, ILSI Research Foundation, Washington, DC, http://cera-gmc.org/index.php?action=gm_crop_database.
CODEX (2003), Guideline for the Conduct of Food Safety Assessment of Foods Derived from Recombinant-DNA Plants, Annex 3: Food Safety Assessment in Situations of Low-Level Presence of Recombinant-DNA Plant Material in Food, http://www.codexalimentarius.org/standards/list-of-standards/.
GMO-COMPASS (2013), ‘Glossary’, http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/glossary (accessed November 2013).
Davison, J. (2010), ‘GM Plants: Science, Politics and EC Regulations’, Plant Science, 178: 9498.
Demeke, T. and Perry, D. J. (2013), ‘Low Level Presence of Unapproved Biotech Materials: Current Status and Capability of DNA-Based Detection Methods’, Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 93: 111.
Drogué, S. and DeMaria, F. (2012), Pesticides Residues and Trade: The Apple of Discord? Food Policy, 37(6): 641649.
FAO (2014), Low Levels of GM Crops in International Food and Feed Trade: FAO International Survey and Economics Analysis, Technical Consultation on Low Levels of Genetically Modified (GM) Crops in International Food and Feed’, Technical Background Paper 2, Rome, Italy, 20–21 March 2014.
FAS (2013a), Vietnam Agricultural Biotechnology Annual. GAIN Report Number: VM3062, http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Hanoi_Vietnam_11-13-2013.pdf. (accessed November 2013).
FAS (2013b), Malaysia Agricultural Biotechnology Annual, GAIN Report No. MY3008, http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Kuala%20Lumpur_Malaysia_7-24-2013.pdf (accessed October 2013).
FAS (2013c), Senegal Agricultural Biotechnology Annual, http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Dakar_Senegal_7-29-2013.pdf (accessed October 2013).
FAS (2013d), Thailand Agricultural Biotechnology Annual, GAIN Report No. TH3062, http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Agricultural%20Biotechnology%20Annual_Bangkok_Thailand_8-16-2013.pdf (accessed October 2013).
Gruère, G. P. (2006), An Analysis of Trade Related International Regulations of Genetically Modified Food and their Effects on Developing Countries. EPT Discussion Paper 147, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Gruère, G. P. (2011), Asynchronous Approvals of GM Products and the Codex Annex: What Low Level Presence Policy for Vietnam? Discussion Paper October 2011, Washington, DC: International Food Research Institute.
Gruère, G. P. and Rao, S. R. (2007), ‘A Review of International Labeling Policies of Genetically Modified Food to Evaluate India's Proposed Rule’, AgBioForum, 10(1): 5164.
Henseler, M., Piot-Lepetit, I., Rerrari, E., Gonzalez Mellado, A., Banse, M., Grethe, H., Parisi, C., and Hélaine, S. (2013), ‘On the Asynchronous Approvals of GM Crops: Potential Market Impacts of a Trade Disruption of EU Soy Imports’, Food Policy, 41: 166176.
ISAAA's GM Approval Database (2013), http://www.isaaa.org/gmapprovaldatabase/.
Kalaitzandonakes, N. (2011), ‘The Economic Impacts of Asynchronous Authorizations and Low Level Presence: An Overview’, Position Paper, October 2011, Washington, DC: International Food Research Institute.
Kalaitzandonakes, N., Kaufman, J., and Miller, D. (2014), ‘Potential Economic Impacts of Zero Thresholds for Unapproved GMOs: The EU Case’, Food Policy, 45: 146157.
Kox, H. and Lejour, A. (2005), ‘Regulatory Heterogeneity as Obstacle for International Services: Trade Discussion Paper 49’, The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Li, Y. and Beghin, J. C. (2014), ‘Protectionism Indices for Non-Tariff Measures: An Application to Maximum Residue Levels’, Food Policy, 45: 5768.
Li, Y., Wailes, E., McKenzie, A. M., and Thomsen, M. R. (2010), ‘LL601 Contamination and Its Impact on US Rice Prices’, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 42(1): 3138.
McDougall, P. (2011), The Cost and Time Involved in the Discovery, Development and Authorization of a New Plant Biotechnology Derived Trait: A Consultancy Study for CropLife International, Midlothian, United Kingdom: CropLife International.
Pérez-Domínguez, I. and Jongeneel, R. (2010), ‘Impacts of Feed Supply Disruption in EU Livestock Sector and Related Industries’, in P. Nowicki et al., Study on the Implications of Asynchronous GMO Approvals for EU Imports of Animal Feed Products, Final Report for Contract No. 30-CE-0317175/00-74, Brussels: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission, Chapter 6.
Philippidis, G. (2010), ‘EU Import Restrictions on Genetically Modified Feeds: Impacts on Spanish, EU and Global Livestock Sectors’, Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 8(1): 317.
Rau, M. L., Shutes, K., and Schlueter, S. (2010), ‘Index of Heterogeneity of Requirements in International Agri-Food Trade’, Working Paper 10/01, EU project ‘NTM Impact’.
Ryan, C. D. and Smyth, S. J. (2012), ‘Economic Implications of Low-level Presence in a Zero-Tolerance European Import Market: The Case of Canadian Triffid Flax’, AgBioForum, 15(1): 2130.
Stein, A. J. and Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. (2010) ‘International Trade and the Global Pipeline of New GM Crops’, Nature Biotechnology, 28: 23–5.
USDA/FAS (2013), ‘Foreign Agriculture Service, Global Agricultural Information Network’, http://www.fas.usda.gov/Pages/Default.aspx (accessed November 2013).
Vigani, M., Raimondi, V., and Olper, A. (2012), ‘International Trade and Endogenous Standards the Case of GMO Regulations’, World Trade Review, 11(3): 415437.
Vigani, M. and Olper, A. (2013), ‘GMO Standards, Endogenous Policy and the Market for Information’, Food Policy, 43: 3243.
Viju, C., Yeung, M. T., and Kerr, W. A. (2011), ‘Post-Moratorium EU Regulation of Genetically Modified Products: Trade Concerns’, CATPRN Commissioned Paper 2011–02, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy and Competitiveness Research Network.
Wieck, C. and Dashja, E. (2014), ‘Differences in Agri-Food Product Labelling Across Selected Countries’, selected paper presented at the IAMO Forum 2014/IATRC Summer Symposium, 25–27 June, Halle (Germany).
Winchester, N., Rau, M. L., Goetz, C., Larue, B., Otsuki, T., Shutes, K., Wieck, C., Burnquist, H. L., Pinto de Souza, M. J., and de Faria, R. N. (2012), ‘The Impact of Regulatory Heterogeneity on Agri-Food Trade’, The World Economy, 35(8): 973993.
Wohlers, A. E. (2010), ‘Regulating Genetically Modified Food’, Politics and the Life Sciences, 29(2): 1739.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

De Faria and Wieck supplementary material
Tables A1-A5

 Word (64 KB)
64 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 35
Total number of PDF views: 132 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 818 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.