Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Seeking mutual understanding: a discourse-theoretical analysis of the WTO Dispute Settlement System

  • EMANUELA CEVA (a1) and ANDREA FRACASSO (a2)
Abstract

The WTO Dispute Settlement System (DSS) has been the object of many studies in politics, law, and economics focusing on institutional design problems. This paper contributes to such studies by accounting for the argumentative nature and sophisticated features of the DSS through a philosophical analysis of the procedures through which it is articulated. Jürgen Habermas's discourse theory is used as a hermeneutic device to disentangle the types of ‘orientations’ (compromise, consensus, and mutual understanding) pertaining to DSS procedures. We show that these latter are oriented primarily to put the parties in a position to reach mutual understanding. Such an orientation is no mere idiosyncrasy of the DSS but is the only one consistently conducive to the WTO's general aims, in response to the various types of disputes that may arise between its Members. Before closing, we bring our procedural considerations to bear on the reform proposals of the DSS.

Copyright
Corresponding author
References
Hide All
Alben, Elissa and Reif, Timothy (2006), ‘Homage to a Bull Moose III: striking the correct balance between political governance and judicialization in the WTO’, in Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A., and Bohanes, J. (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alexy, Robert (1993), ‘Justification and Application of Norms’, Ratio Iuris, 6: 157170.
(1996), ‘Jürgen Habermas's Theory of Legal Discourse’, Cardozo Law Review, 17: 10271034.
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert W. (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bello, Judith H. (1996), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More’, American Journal of International Law, 90: 416417.
Berger, Johannes (1991), ‘The Linguistification of the Sacred and the Delinguistification of the Economy’, in Honneth, A. and Joas, H. (eds.), Communicative Action, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, Andrew and Stern, Robert (2007), ‘Concepts of Fairness in the Global Trading System’, Pacific Economic Review, 12(3): 293318.
Carmody, Chios (2008), ‘A Theory of WTO Law’, Journal of International Economic Law, 11(3): 131.
Ceva, Emanuela (2007), ‘Plural Values and Heterogeneous Situations: Considerations on the Scope for a Political Theory of Justice’, European Journal of Political Theory, 6(3): 359375.
Chambers, Simone (1996), Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Cottier, Thomas (2006), ‘DSU Reform: Resolving Underlying Balance-of-Power Issues’, in Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A., and Bohanes, J. (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Gary (2007), ‘Habermas and “Political World Society”: A Sympathetic Critique’, available at http://cohering.net/re/391hpws.html, last accessed 26/09/2008.
Ethier, Wilfred J. (2004), ‘Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World’, Review of International Economics, 12(3): 303320.
Feteris, Eveline (2003), ‘The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory’, Informal Logic, 23(2): 139159.
Günther, Klaus (1989), ‘A Normative Conception of Coherence for a Discursive Theory of Legal Justification’, Ratio Juris, 2: 155166.
Habermas, Jürgen (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 1, Boston: Beacon.
(1988), ‘Law and Morality’, in McMurrin, S. M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
(1990), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge: Polity Press.
(1995), Justification and Application, Oxford: Polity Press.
(1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1998), On the Pragmatics of Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2003), Truth and Justification, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2005), Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hart, H. L. A. (1994), The Concept of Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2006), ‘A Survey of the Literature on the WTO Dispute Settlement System’, IFN Working Paper, 684.
Howse, Robert and Esserman, Susan (2006), ‘The Appellate Body, the WTO Dispute Settlement System, and the Politics of Multilateralism’, in Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A., and Bohanes, J. (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, Valerie (2006), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement System – from Initiating Proceedings to Ensuring Implementation: What Needs Improvement?’, in Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A., and Bohanes, J. (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keck, Alexander and Schropp, Simon (2008), ‘Indisputably Essential: The Economics of Dispute Settlement Institutions in Trade Agreements’, Journal of World Trade, 42 (5): 785812.
Krajewski, Markus (2001), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Perpsectives of WTO Law’, Journal of World Trade, 35(1): 167186.
Jackson, John H. (1997a), The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, 2nd edition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1997b), ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstandings on the Nature of Legal Obligation’, American Journal of International Law, 91: 6064.
(2004), ‘International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports’, American Journal of International Law, 98(1): 109125.
(2008), ‘The Case of the World Trade Organization’, International Affairs, 84(3): 437454.
Maggi, Giovanni and Staiger, Robert W. (2008), ‘On the Role and Design of Dispute Settlement Procedures in International Trade Agreements’, NBER Working Paper 14067, June.
Matsushita, Mitsuo, Schoenbaum, Thomas J., and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2006), The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ortino, Federico and Ernst-Ulrich, Petersmann (eds.) (2004), The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Palmeter, David and Mavroidis, Petros C. (2004), Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Origanization, Practice and Procedure, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Panizzon, Marion (2007), ‘Fairness, Promptness and Effectiveness: Creating a Good Faith Standard for WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures’, NCCR Trade Working Papers, No. 2007/19, March.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (2004), ‘The Doha Development Round Negotiations on Improvements and Clarifications of the Dispute Settlement Understanding 2001–2003: An Overview’, in Ortino, F. and Petersmann, E. U. (eds.), The World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System 1995–2003, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
(2006), ‘From “Member-Driven Governance” to Constitutionally Limited “Multilevel Trade Governance”’, in Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A., and Bohanes, J. (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Petersmann, Ernst-Ulrich (ed.) (2005), Reforming the World Trading System: Legitimacy, Efficiency and Democratic Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rehg, William and Bohman, James (2002), ‘Discourse and Democracy: The Formal and Informal Bases of Legitimacy in Between Facts and Norms’, in Schomberg, R. Von and Baynes, K. (eds.), Discourse and Democracy: Essays on Habermas's Between Facts and Norms, Albany: SUNY.
Sacerdoti, Giorgio (2006), ‘The Dispute Settlement System of the WTO in Action: A Perspective on the First Ten Years’, in Sacerdoti, G., Yanovich, A., and Bohanes, J. (eds.), The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Srinivasan, T. N. (2007), ‘The Dispute Settlement Mechanism of the WTO: A Brief History and an Evaluation from Economic, Contractarian and Legal Perspectives’, The World Economy, 30(7): 10331067.
Schwartz, Warren F. and Sykes, Alan O. (2002), ‘The Economic Structure of Renegotiation and Dispute Resolution in the WTO/GATT System’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1): 179204.
Steinberg, Richard H. (2004), ‘Judicial Lawmaking at the WTO: Discursive, Constitutional, and Political Constraints’, The American Journal of International Law, 98(2): 247275.
Warnke, Georgia (1995), ‘Communicative Rationality and Cultural Values’, in White, S. K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
WTO (1999), The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmermann, Thomas A. (2006), Negotiating the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, London: Cameron May.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed