Skip to main content

Trading Cultures: Appellate Body Report on China–Audiovisuals (WT/DS363/AB/R, adopted 19 January 2010)


In China–Audiovisuals, a series of Chinese restrictions on the importation and distribution of certain ‘cultural’ or ‘content’ goods and services were found to violate GATT, GATS, and China's Accession Protocol. This paper reviews the definition of what is a ‘good’ (is a ‘film’ a good or a service?) and the extent to which GATT Article XX exceptions can justify violations under WTO instruments other than the GATT itself. We argue that trade volumes are unlikely to significantly rise as a result of this ruling as it does not affect China's right to keep out foreign films and publications if China finds them objectionable. However, foreign producers of audiovisuals can now gain potentially large economic rents, by being able to export and distribute their products into the Chinese market. Finally, we discuss the issue of the protection of cultural goods and review the recent literature on trade and culture that has put forward economic arguments to justify, under some conditions, the protection of cultural goods.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Akerlof George A. and Kranton Rachel E. (2000), ‘Economics and Identity’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 715753.
Bala Venkatesh and Long Ngo Van (2005), ‘International Trade and Cultural Diversity with Preference Selection’, European Journal of Political Economy, 21(1): 143162.
Bernier Ivan (2003), ‘Local Content Requirements for Film, Radio, and Television as a Means of Protecting Cultural Diversity: Theory and Reality’, Mimeo,
Bisin Alberto and Verdier Thierry (2000), ‘“Beyond the Melting Pot”: Cultural Transmission, Marriage, and the Evolution of Ethnic and Religious Traits’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3): 955988.
Bown Chad P. and Pauwelyn Joost (eds.) (2010), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Broude Tomer and Hestermeyer Holger, ‘The First Condition of Progress – The Limits of International Trade Law as a Promoter of Freedom of Speech’, Research Showcase, Poster Session, 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, 27 March 2009.
Disdier Anne-Célia, Keith Head, and Mayer Thierry (2010), ‘Exposure to Foreign Media and Changes in Cultural Traits: Evidence from Naming Patterns in France’, Journal of International Economics, 80(2): 226238.
Francois Patrick and van Ypersele Tanguy (2002), ‘On the Protection of Cultural Goods’, Journal of International Economics, 56(2): 359369.
Janeba Eckhard (2004), ‘International Trade and Cultural Identity’, NBER Working Paper No. 10426.
Janeba Eckhard (2007), ‘International Trade and Consumption Network Externalities’, European Economic Review, 51(4): 781803.
Olivier Jacques, Thoenig Mathias, and Verdier Thierry (2008), ‘Globalization and the Dynamics of Cultural Identity’, Journal of International Economics, 76(2): 356370.
Pauwelyn Joost (2010), ‘Squaring Free Trade in Culture with Chinese Censorship: The WTO Appellate Body Report on China – Audiovisuals’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 11(1): 119140.
Rauch James E. and Trindade Vitor (2009), ‘Neckties in the Tropics: A Model of International Trade and Cultural Diversity’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(3): 809843.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

World Trade Review
  • ISSN: 1474-7456
  • EISSN: 1475-3138
  • URL: /core/journals/world-trade-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 83 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 482 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.