Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:57:23.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aerofoil tones at moderate Reynolds number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2011

Christopher K. W. Tam*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4510, USA
Hongbin Ju
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4510, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: tam@math.fsu.edu

Abstract

It is known experimentally that an aerofoil immersed in a uniform stream at a moderate Reynolds number emits tones. However, there have been major differences in the experimental observations in the past. Some experiments reported the observation of multiple tones, with strong evidence that these tones are most probably generated by a feedback loop. There is also an experiment reporting the observation of a single tone with no tonal jump or other features associated with feedback. In spite of the obvious differences in the experimental observations published in the literature, it is noted that all the dominant tone frequencies measured in all the investigations are in agreement with an empirically derived Paterson formula. The objective of the present study is to perform a direct numerical simulation (DNS) of the flow and acoustic phenomenon to investigate the tone generation mechanism. When comparing with experimental studies, numerical simulations appear to have two important advantages. The first is that there is no background wind tunnel noise in numerical simulation. This avoids the signal-to-noise ratio problem inherent in wind tunnel experiments. In other words, it is possible to study tones emitted by a truly isolated aerofoil computationally. The second advantage is that DNS produces a full set of space–time data, which can be very useful in determining the tone generation processes. The present effort concentrates on the tones emitted by three NACA0012 aerofoils with a slightly rounded trailing edge but with different trailing edge thickness at zero degree angle of attack. At zero degree angle of attack, in the Reynolds number range of to , the boundary layer flow is attached nearly all the way to the trailing edge of the aerofoil. Unlike an aerofoil at an angle of attack, there is no separation bubble, no open flow separation. All the flow separation features tend to increase the complexity of the tone generation processes. The present goal is limited to finding the basic tone generation mechanism in the simplest flow configuration. Our DNS results show that, for the flow configuration under study, the aerofoil emits only a single tone. This is true for all three aerofoils over the entire Reynolds number range of the present study. In the literature, it is known that Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities of free shear layers generally have a much higher spatial growth rate than that of the Tollmien–Schlichting boundary layer instabilities. A near-wake non-parallel flow instability analysis is performed. It is found that the tone frequencies are the same as the most amplified Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at the location where the wake has a minimum half-width. This suggests that near-wake instability is the energy source of aerofoil tones. However, flow instabilities at low subsonic Mach numbers generally do not cause strong tones. An investigation of how near-wake instability generates tones is carried out using the space–time data provided by numerical simulations. Our observations indicate that the dominant tone generation process is the interaction of the oscillatory motion of the near wake, driven by flow instability, with the trailing edge of the aerofoil. Secondary mechanisms involving unsteady near-wake motion and the formation of discrete vortices in regions further downstream are also observed.

JFM classification

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arbey, H. & Bataille, J. 1983 Noise generated by airfoil profiles placed in a uniform laminar flow. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 3347.Google Scholar
2. Bers, A. 1975 Linear waves and instabilities. In Physique des Plasmas (ed. DeWitt, C. & Peyraud, J. ). pp. 117215. Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
3. Briggs, R. J. 1964 Electron-Stream Interaction with Plasmas. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chong, T. P. & Joseph, P. 2009 An experimental study of tonal noise mechanism of laminar airfoils. AIAA Paper 2009-3345.Google Scholar
5. Desquesnes, G., Terracol, M. & Sagaut, P. 2007 Numerical investigation of the tone noise mechanism over laminar airfoils. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 155182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fink, M. R. 1975 Prediction of airfoil tone frequencies. J. Aircraft 12, 118120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jones, L. E. & Sandberg, R. D. 2010 Numerical investigation of tonal airfoil self-noise generated by an acoustic feedback-loop. AIAA Paper 2010-3701.Google Scholar
8. Kingan, M. J. & Pearse, J. R. 2009 Laminar boundary layer instability noise produced by an aerofoil. J. Sound Vib. 322, 808828.Google Scholar
9. Koch, W. 1985 Local instability characteristics and frequency determination of self-excited wake flows. J. Sound Vib. 99, 5383.Google Scholar
10. Kurotaki, T., Sumi, T., Atobe, T. & Hiyama, J. 2008 Numerical simulation around NACA0015 with tonal noise generation. AIAA Paper 2008-0672.Google Scholar
11. Lee, H. & Kang, S. H. 2000 Flow characteristics of transitional boundary layers on an airfoil in wakes. Trans. ASME: J. Fluids Engng 122, 522532.Google Scholar
12. Lowson, M. V., Fides, S. P. & Nash, E. C. 1994 Laminar boundary layer acoustic instabilities. AIAA Paper 94-0358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McAlpine, A., Nash, E. C. & Lowson, M. V. 1999 On the generation of discrete frequency tones by the flow around an airfoil. J. Sound Vib. 222, 753779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Nakano, T., Fujisawa, N. & Lee, S. 2006 Measurement of tonal-noise characteristics and periodic flow structure around NACA0018 airfoil. Exp. Fluids 40, 482490.Google Scholar
15. Nash, E. C., Lowson, M. V. & McAlpine, A. 1999 Boundary-layer instability noise on airfoils. J. Fluid Mech. 382, 2761.Google Scholar
16. Oerlemans, S. 2003 Wind tunnel aeroacoustic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines. NREL SR-500-34470. National Aerospace Laboratory, Emmeloord, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
17. Paterson, R. W., Vogt, P. G., Fink, M. R. & Munch, C. L. 1973 Vortex noise of isolated airfoils. J. Aircraft 10, 296302.Google Scholar
18. Sandberg, R. D., Jones, L. E., Sandham, N. D. & Joseph, P. F. 2009 Direct numerical simulations of tonal noise generated by laminar flow past airfoils. J. Sound Vib. 320, 838858.Google Scholar
19. Sandberg, R. D., Sandham, N. D. & Joseph, P. F. 2007 Direct numerical simulations of trailing-edge noise generated by boundary-layer instabilities. J. Sound Vib. 304, 677690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Saric, W. S. & Nayfeh, A. H. 1975 Nonparallel stability of boundary layer flows. Phys. Fluids 18, 945950.Google Scholar
21. Sharland, I. J. 1964 Sources of noise in axial flow fans. J. Sound Vib. 1, 302322.Google Scholar
22. Stolz, S., Adams, N. A. & Kleiser, L. 2001 An approximate deconvolution model for large-eddy simulation with application to incompressible wall bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 13, 9971015.Google Scholar
23. Tam, C. K. W. 1974 Discrete tones of isolated airfoils. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55, 11731177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Tam, C. K. W. & Hu, F. Q. 1989 On the three families of instability waves of high speed jets. J. Fluid Mech. 201, 447483.Google Scholar
25. Tam, C. K. W. & Hu, F. Q. 2004 An optimized multi-dimensional interpolation scheme for computational aeroacoustics applications using overset grids. AIAA Paper 2004-2812.Google Scholar
26. Tam, C. K. W. & Kurbatskii, K. A. 2003 Multi-size-mesh multi-time-step dispersion-relation-preserving scheme for multiple scales aeroacoustics problems. Intl J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 17, 119132.Google Scholar
27. Tam, C. K. W. & Webb, J. C. 1993 Dispersion-relation-preserving scheme for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 107, 262281.Google Scholar
28. Tam, C. K. W., Webb, J. C. & Dong, A. 1993 A study of the short wave component in computational acoustics. J. Comput. Acoust. 1, 130.Google Scholar