Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-2r2wp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T12:33:43.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Command Lines for the Humanities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2024

Meredith Martin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 139 , Issue 3 , May 2024 , pp. 541 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

“The AI for Humanists Project.” AI for Humanists, aiforhumanists.com. Accessed 11 Apr. 2024.Google Scholar
Caswell, Michelle, et al., editors. Critical Archival Studies, special issue of Journal of Library and Information Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Caswell, Michelle, et al., editors. “Critical Archival Studies: An Introduction.” Journal of Library and Information Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50.Google Scholar
“Collaborators’ Bill of Rights.” MediaCommons Press, 2011, mcpress.media-commons.org/offthetracks/part-one-models-for-collaboration-career-paths-acquiring-institutional-support-and-transformation-in-the-field/a-collaboration/collaborators%E2%80%99-bill-of-rights/.Google Scholar
Cordell, Ryan. “‘Q i-tjb the Raven’: Taking Dirty OCR Seriously.” Book History, vol. 20, 2017, pp. 188–225, https://doi.org/10.1353/bh.2017.0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0.” Assembled by Schnapp, Jeffrey et al., Multitudes, vol. 59, no. 2, 2015, pp. 181–95.Google Scholar
Di Pressi, Haley, et al. “A Student Collaborators’ Bill of Rights.” Humanities Technology, University of California, Los Angeles, 8 June 2015, humtech.ucla.edu/news/a-student-collaborators-bill-of-rights/.Google Scholar
Foreman, P. Gabrielle, and Mookerjee, Labanya. “Computing in the Dark: Spreadsheets, Data Collection, and DH's Racist Inheritance.” Always Already Computational: Library Collections as Data: National Forum Position Statements, Mar. 2017, pp. 11–12, collectionsasdata.github.io/aac_positionstatements.pdf.Google Scholar
Gitelman, Lisa. “Searching and Thinking about Searching JSTOR.” Representations, vol. 127, no. 1, summer 2014, pp. 73–82, https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2014.127.1.73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, Stephen H. Old Books and Digital Publishing: Eighteenth-Century Collections Online. Cambridge UP, 2020.Google Scholar
Kubacka, Teresa. “There Is More to Reliable Chatbots than Providing Scientific References: The Case of ScopusAI.” The Scholarly Kitchen, 21 Feb. 2024, scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2024/02/21/guest-post-there-is-more-to-reliable-chatbots-than-providing-scientific-references-the-case-of-scopusai/.Google Scholar
Lang, Anouk, and Dombrowski, Quinn. “The Ghost in Anouk's Laptop.” The Data-Sitters Club, no. 9, 18 Feb. 2021, https://doi.org/10.25740/ys319vz9576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Alan. “Data Moves: Libraries and Data Science Workflows.” Libraries and Archives in the Digital Age, edited by Mizruchi, Susan, Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, pp. 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, Bonnie. “Archaeology of a Digitization.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 65, no. 8, 2024, pp. 1515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcum, Deanna, and Schonfeld, Roger C.. Along Came Google: A History of Library Digitization. Princeton UP, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Meredith. The Rise and Fall of Meter, 1860–1930. Princeton UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Martin, Meredith. “The Writing of Sound.” The Sound of Writing, edited by Cannon, Christopher and Justice, Steven, Johns Hopkins UP, 2023, pp. 127–50.Google Scholar
McGill, Meredith L. “Format.” Keywords in Early American Literature and Material Texts, special issue of Early American Studies, edited by Dinius, Marcy and Hazard, Sonia, vol. 16, no. 4, fall 2018, pp. 671–77.Google Scholar
McGill, Meredith L. “Literary History, Book History, and Media Studies.” Turns of Event: American Literary Studies in Motion, edited by Blum, Hester, U of Pennsylvania P, 2016, pp. 23–39.Google Scholar
McGill, Meredith L. “The Traffic in Poems: Traversing the Atlantic.” Introduction. The Traffic in Poems: Nineteenth-Century Poetry and Transatlantic Exchange, edited by McGill, Rutgers UP, 2008, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
McGill, Meredith L., and Parker, Andrew. “The Future of the Literary Past.” PMLA, vol. 125, no. 4, Oct. 2010, pp. 959–67.Google Scholar
MLA Committee on Information Technology. “Guidelines for Evaluating Digital Scholarship.” Modern Language Association, 2024, www.mla.org/Digital-Scholarship. PDF download.Google Scholar
Schüller-Zwierlein, André, et al. The Ljubljana Reading Manifesto: Why Higher-Level Reading Is Important. readingmanifesto.org/. Accessed 11 Apr. 2024.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Joan M., and Cook, Terry. “Archives, Records, and Power: The Making of Modern Memory.” Archival Science, no. 2, 2002, pp. 171–85.Google Scholar
Seybold, Matt. “Ed Tech, AI, and the Unbundling of Teaching and Research.” The American Vandal, episode 13, 2 Nov. 2023, theamericanvandal.substack.com/p/ed-tech-ai-and-the-unbundling-of.Google Scholar
Seybold, Matt. “Jason Wingard's EdTech Griftopia.” Los Angeles Review of Books, 23 Feb. 2023, lareviewofbooks.org/article/jason-wingards-edtech-griftopia/.Google Scholar
Sterne, Jonathan. MP3: The Meaning of a Format. Duke UP, 2012.Google Scholar
Tenen, Dennis. Plain Text: The Poetics of Computation. Stanford UP, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, Ted. “Theorizing Research Practices We Forgot to Theorize Twenty Years Ago.” Representations, vol. 127, no. 1, Aug. 2014, pp. 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar