Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:38:20.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social Investment Perspective, Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes and the Welfare Mix: Peru and Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2016

Nora Nagels
Nora Nagels*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) 400, rue Sainte-Catherine Est, Pavillon Hubert Aquin, Montréal (Québec) H2L 2C5 Email: Nagels.nora@uqam.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programmes have spread across Latin America since the late 1990s. They constitute one of the major changes in social policy in Latin America in the last twenty years (Barrientos, 2009). This innovation has significantly influenced the welfare mix (Esping-Andersen, 1990). Those who examine the welfare mix from a feminist perspective (Orloff, 1996; Martínez, 2008) insist that it is necessary to take into account the gender consequences of changing this mix. Based on a qualitative analysis of CCT programmes in Peru and Bolivia, this article makes two arguments. First, CCT programmes demonstrate that instead of being purely liberal or even neoliberal, the actions of the state in the production of welfare are now grounded from the perspective of social investment. Second, in Peru and Bolivia, the gendered impacts of this new state orientation nonetheless reinforce maternalistic and coercive practices.

Keywords

GenderWelfare regimePeruBoliviaSocial policies
Type
Themed Section on Assessing the Effects of Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin American Societies in the Early Twenty-First Century
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 479 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adato, M., De La Biere, B., Mindek, D. and Quisumbing, A. (2000) The Impact of PROGRESA on Women's Status and Intrahousehold Relations, Final Report, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
Adato, M. and Roopnaraine, T. (2010) ‘Women's status, gender relations, and conditional cash transfers’, in Adato, M. and Hoddinott, J. (eds.), Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, International Food Policy Institute, pp. 284–314.Google Scholar
Arroyo, J. (2010) Estudio cualitativo de los efectos del programa JUNTOS en los cambios de compor-tamiento de los hogares beneficiarios en el distrito de Chuschi: avances y evidencias, Lima: Juntos.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2004) ‘Latin America: towards a liberal-informal welfare regime’, in Gough, I. and Wood, G. (eds.), Insecurity and Welfare Regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Social Policy in Development Contexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 121–68.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2009) ‘Labour markets and the (hyphenated) welfare regime in Latin America’, Economy and Society, 38, 81–108.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2012) ‘Dilemas de las políticas sociales latinoamericanas ¿Hacia una protección social fragmentada?’, Nueva Sociedad, 239, 65–78.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. and Santibáñez, C. (2009a) ‘New forms of social assistance and the evolution of social protection in Latin America’, Journal of Latin American Studies, 41, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, A. and Santibáñez, C. (2009b) ‘Social policy for poverty reduction in lower-income countries in Latin America: lessons and challenges’, Social Policy and Administration, 43, 409–24.Google Scholar
Boesten, J. (2009) Intersectiong Inequalities: Women and Social Policy in Peru, 1990–2000, University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, S. (2008) ‘From structural adjustment to social adjustment: a gendered analysis of conditional cash transfer programmes in Mexico and Nicaragua’, Global Social Policy, 8, 188–207.Google Scholar
Carnes, M. and Mares, I. (2015) ‘Explaining the “return of the state” in middle-income countries: employment vulnerability, income, and preferences for social protection in Latin America’, Politics and Society, 43, 525–50.Google Scholar
Cecchini, S. and Madariaga, A. (2011) Programas de transferencias condicionadas: Balance de la experiencia reciente en América latina y el Caribe, Santiago de Chile: CEPAL, ASDI.Google Scholar
Correa Aste, N. and Roopnaraine, T. (2014), Pueblos Indígenas y programas de transferencias condicionadas: Estudio etnográfico sobre le implementación y los efectos socioculturales del Programma Juntos en seis comunidades andinas y amzónicas de Perú, Lima: IFPRI, PUCP, BID.Google Scholar
Craske, N. (2003) ‘Gender, poverty and social movements’, in Chant, S. and Craske, N. (eds.), Gender in Latin America, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, pp. 46–71.Google Scholar
Comisión Verdad y Reconciliación (CVR) (2003) Informe final, Lima: Comisión de Verdad y Reconciliación.Google Scholar
De Brauw, A., Gilligan, D. O., Hoddinott, J. and Roy, S. (2014) ‘The impact of Bolsa Família on women's decision-making power’, World Development, 59, 487–504.Google Scholar
Escobar Latapí, A. and Gonzalez De La Rocha, M. (2004) Evaluación cualitativa del programa Oppurtunidades, México: Centro de Investigación y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ewig, C. (2010) Second-Wave Neoliberalism: Gender, Race, and Health Sector Reform in Peru, University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Filgueira, C. H. and Filgueira, F. (2002) ‘Models of welfare and models of capitalism: the limits of transferability’, in Huber, E. (ed.), Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America, Chapel Hill: The Pennyslvania State University Press, pp. 127–57.Google Scholar
Filgueira, F. (1998) ‘El nuevo modelo de prestaciones sociales en América Latina: residualismo y ciudadanía estratificada’, in Roberts, B. (ed.), Ciudadanía y política social, San José: FLACSO, pp. 71–116.Google Scholar
Francke, P. and Mendoza, A. (2006) ‘Perú: programa JUNTOS’, in Cohen, E. and Franco, R. (eds.), Transferencias con coresponsabilidad: Una mirada latinoamericana, Lima: FLACSO, pp. 391–432.Google Scholar
Gideon, J. (1998) ‘The politics of social service provision trought NGOs: a study of Latin America’, Bulletin of Latin American Research, 17, 303–21.Google Scholar
Gideon, J. (2014) Gender, Globalization, and Health in a Latin American Context, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gil-García, Ó. F. (2015) ‘Gender equality, community divisions, and autonomy: the Prospera conditional cash transfer program in Chiapas, Mexico’, Current Sociology, 63, 1–23.Google Scholar
Grompone, R. (2009) ‘Introducción: Los movimientos sociales en el Perú y sus marcos explicativos’, in Grompone, R. (ed.), Entre el crecimiento económico y la insatisfacción social: las protestas sociales en el Perú, Lima: IEP, pp. 9–58.Google Scholar
Hassim, S. and Razavi, S. (2006) ‘Gender and social policy in a global context: uncovering the gendered structure of “the social”’, in Razavi, S. and Hassim, S. (eds.), Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context: Uncovering the Gendered Structure of ‘the Social’, New York: Palgrave, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. and Jones, N. (2013) Gender and Social Protection in the Developing World: Beyond Mothers and Safety Nets, London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. (2005). ‘Successful social policy regimes? Political economy, politics, and the structure of social policy in Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, and Costa Rica’, Conference on Democratic Governability, Kellogg Institute, University of Notre Dame, 7–8 October.Google Scholar
Huber, L., Zárate, P., Durand, A., Madalengoitia, Ó. and Morel, J. (2009) Programa JUNTOS. certezas y malentidos en torno a las transferencias condicionadas: Estudio de caso de seis distritos rurales del Perú, Lima: IEP, UNICEF, UNFPA.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. H. and Borges Sugiyama, N. (2014) ‘Transforming subjects into citizens: insights from Brazil's Bolsa Familia’, American Political Science Association, 12, 829–45.Google Scholar
IEP (2009) Estudio de percepción sobre cambios de comportamiento de los beneficiarios y accesibilidad al programa JUNTOS en el distrito de San Jerónimo (Andahuaylas-Apurimas), Lima: IEP.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. (2008) ‘Resolving risk? Marriage and creative conjugality’, in Cornwal, A., Harrison, E. and Whitehead, A. (eds.), Gender Myths and Feminist Fable: The Struggle for Interpretative Power in Gender and Development, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 105–26.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (1986) ‘Gender and reproduction: or, babies and the state’, Studies in Political Economy, 20, 9–46.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. (2009) ‘Lost in translation: the social investement perspective and gender equality’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 16, 446–83.Google Scholar
Jenson, J. and Saint-Martin, D. (2006) ‘Building blocks for a new social architecture: the LEGO™ paradigm of an active society’, Policy and Politics, 34, 429–51.Google Scholar
Jones, N. and Villar Marquez, E. (2014) ‘Is cash the answer? Lessons for child protection programming from Peru’, Child Abuse and Neglect, 38, 383–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the development of welfare regimes’, Journal of European Social Policy, 2, 159–73.Google Scholar
Luccisano, L. and Wall, G. (2009) ‘The shaping of motherhood through social investment in children: examples from Canada and Mexico’, in Macdonald, L. and Ruckert, A. (eds.), Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
Macdonald, L. and Ruckert, A. (2009) ‘Post-neoliberalism in the Americas: an introduction’, in Macdonald, L. and Ruckert, A. (eds.), Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Martinez Franzoni, J. (2008) ‘Welfare regimes in Latin America: capturing constellations of markets, families and policies’, Latin Amercian Politics and Society, 50, 67–100.Google Scholar
Martinez Franzoni, J. and Voorend, K. (2012) ‘Blacks, whites, or grays? Conditional transfers and gender equality in Latin America’, Social Politics, 19, 383–407.Google Scholar
Mcguire, J. W. (2013) ‘Conditional cash transfers in Bolivia: origins, impact, and universality’, Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Mesa-Lago, C. (2002) Models of Development, Social Policy and Reform in Latin America, Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Mesa-Lago, C. (2008) ‘Social insurance (pensions and health), labour markets and coverage in Latin America’, UNISD, Social policy and Development, Programme Paper, 36, 1–40.Google Scholar
Ministerío de Planificación del Desarrollo (2006) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo: Bolivia digna, soberana, productiva y democrática para Vivir Bien, La Paz: Ministerio de Planificación del Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (1985) ‘Mobilization without emancipation? Women's Interests in state and revolution in Nicaragua’, Feminist Studies, 11, 227–54.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2006) ‘Mothers at the service of the new poverty agenda: progresa/oportunidades, Mexico's conditional transfer programme’, Social Policy and Administration, 40, 425–49.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2007) ‘Change and continuity in social protection in Latin America: mothers at the service of the state?’, Gender and Development, Geneva: United Nation Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. (2008) ‘Conditional cash transfers: a pathway to women's empowerment?’, Pathways of Women's Empowerment [Online], 5, http://www.pathwaysofempowerment.org/Social_Protection.html [accessed 27.02.2013].Google Scholar
Molyneux, M. and Thomson, M. (2011) ‘Cash transfers, gender equity and women's empowerment in Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia’, Gender and Development, 19, 195–212.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (2011) ‘Beyond the welfare state as we knew it?’, in Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State?: Ideas, Policies and Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Moser, C. (1993) Gender Planning and Development, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nagels, N. (2013) ‘Genre et politiques de lutte contre la pauvreté au Pérou et en Bolivie: quels enjeux de citoyenneté?’, Ph.D., Graduate Institute, Geneva.Google Scholar
Nagels, N. (2014) ‘Programmes de transferts conditionnés au Pérou et en Bolivie: entre ciblage et universalisation de l'assistance sociale’, Revue internationale de politique comparée, 21, 111–32.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. (1993) ‘Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states’, American Sociological Association, 58, 303–28.Google Scholar
Orloff, A. (1996) ‘Gender in the welfare state’, Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 51–78.Google Scholar
Piccoli, E. (2014) ‘Dicen que los cien soles son del Diablo’: L'interprétation apocalyptique et mythique du Programa Juntos dans les communautés andines de Cajamarca (Pérou) et la critique populaire des programmes sociaux', Social Compass, 61, 328–47.Google Scholar
Pribble, J. (2006) ‘Women and welfare: the politics of coping with new social risks in Chile and Uruguay’, Latin American Research Review, 41, 84–111.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, D. (2000) ‘Les droits sociaux des femmes et des hommes: La dimension du genre dans les États-providence’, in Ballmer-Cao, T.-H. and Mottier, V. (eds.), Genre et politique. Débats et perspectives, Paris: Gallimard, pp. 233–76.Google Scholar
Staab, S. (2010) ‘Social investment perspective in Chile and Latin America: towards equal opportunities for women and children?’, Journal of Social Policy, 39, 607–26.Google Scholar
Staab, S. (2012) ‘Maternalism, male-breadwinner bias, and market reform: historical legacies and current reforms in Chilean social policy’, Social Politics, 19, 299–332.Google Scholar
Tabbush, C. (2010) ‘Latin American women's protection after adjustment: a feminist critique of conditional cash transfers in Chile and Argentina’, Oxford Development Studies, 38, 437–59.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. (2009) ‘The contradictions and transformations of neoliberalism in Latin America: from structural adjustement to “empowering the poor”’, in Macdonald, L. and Ruckert, A. (eds.), Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unidad Ejecutora del Bono Juancito Pinto (2008) Informe de cierre preliminar del Bono Juancito Pinto al 31 de diciembre 2008, La Paz: Ministerio de Educación y de Cultura.Google Scholar
Vargas, R. (2010) Gender Risk, Poverty ad Vulnerability in Peru: A Case Study of the Juntos Programme, London: ODI.Google Scholar
Vidal Fuertes, C., Martínez, S., Celhay, P. and Claros Gómez, S. (2015) Evaluación de Impacto del Programa de Salud Materno Infantil ‘Bono Juana Azurduy’, La Paz: Unidad de Análisis de Políticas Sociales y Económicas, BID, Banco Mundial.Google Scholar