Article contents
On the limits of agency for successful aging at work
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 November 2020
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
Footnotes
Rachel S. Rauvola, Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA. Cort W. Rudolph, Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
References
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464. doi: 10.1177/0891243206289499
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badawy, P. J., & Schieman, S. (2019). When family calls: How gender, money, and care shape the relationship between family contact and family-to-work conflict. Journal of Family Issues. doi: 10.1177/0192513x19888769
Google Scholar
Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. American Psychologist, 52, 366–380. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.52.4.366
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Diemer, M. A., & Autin, K. L. (2016). The psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 127–148. doi: 10.1037/cou0000140
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 43–48. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12013
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascoigne, C., Parry, E., & Buchanan, D. (2015). Extreme work, gendered work? How extreme jobs and the discourse of “personal choice” perpetuate gender inequality. Organization, 22, 457–475. doi: 10.1177/1350508415572511
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschi, A., Shockley, K. M., & Zacher, H. (2019). Achieving work–family balance: An action regulation model. Academy of Management Review, 44, 150–171. doi: 10.5465/amr.2016.0409
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, S., & Calasanti, T. (2015). Critical perspectives on successful aging: Does it “appeal more than it illuminates”? Gerontologist, 55, 26–33. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu027
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kooij, D. T. A. M., Zacher, H., Wang, M., & Heckhausen, J. (2020). Successful aging at work: A process model to guide future research and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 13(3), 345–365.Google Scholar
Pitesa, M., & Pillutla, M. M. (2019). Socioeconomic mobility and talent utilization of workers from poorer backgrounds: The overlooked importance of within-organization dynamics. Academy of Management Annals, 13, 737–769. doi: 10.5465/annals.2017.0115
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmader, T., & Sedikides, C. (2018). State authenticity as fit to environment: The implications of social identity for fit, authenticity, and self-segregation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 228–259. doi: 10.1177/1088868317734080
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, N. M., Dittmann, A. G., & Townsend, S. S. (2017). Social class and models of competence: How gateway institutions disadvantage working-class Americans and how to intervene. In Elliot, A. J., Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (pp. 512–528). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. C., & Spacapan, S. (1991). Perceptions of control in vulnerable populations. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 1–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1991.tb01831.x
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrasher, G. R., Zabel, K., Wynne, K., & Baltes, B. B. (2016). The importance of workplace motives in understanding work–family issues for older workers. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 1–11. doi: 10.1093/workar/wav021
Google Scholar
Tomasik, M. J., Knecht, M., & Freund, A. M. (2017). Some evidence for the usefulness of an optimal foraging theory perspective on goal conflict and goal facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 962–980. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000165
CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 7
- Cited by