Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:27:04.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethylene Adsorption and Movement in Soils and Adsorption by Soil Constituents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. W. Witt  and
J. B. Weber
W. W. Witt
Affiliation:
Univ. of Kentucky, Princeton, KY 42445
J. B. Weber
Affiliation:
North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adsorption of ethylene in four North Carolina soils and on montmorillonite, kaolinite, and organic matter was studied. Rate of ethylene diffusion through soils in the field and laboratory and its rate of loss from field soil were also examined. Ethylene was adsorbed in greater quantities on two soils which were limed as compared to their field pH. Ethylene adsorption by another surface soil and a subsoil were unaffected by pH changes. The order of adsorption of several hydrocarbon gases by two of the soils was ethylene = propylene ≫ methane ≥ ethane ≥ propane. Montmorillonite adsorbed more ethylene than did kaolinite or organic matter. Soils which adsorbed ethylene also had slower diffusion rates when ethylene was injected into a homogeneous soil column. Ethylene diffused 2.1 m horizontally and 0.7 m vertically to cause at least 50% witch weed (Striga lutea Lour.) seed germination in a Lakeland soil in the field. Witchweed seed germination as high as 90% was obtained at soil depths of 0.3 m and horizontal distances of 0.7 m from the point of ethylene injection.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , July 1975 , pp. 302 - 307
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allison, L.E., Bollen, W.B., and Moodie, C.D. 1965. Total carbon. Pages 1346–1366, in Black, C.A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Agron. Soc. of Amer., Inc., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
2. Brunauer, S. 1945. Chapter VII, The Adsorption of Gases and Vapors. Vol. I. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 511 pp.Google Scholar
3. Egley, G.H. and Dale, J.E. 1970. Ethylene, 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid and witchweed germination. Weed Sci. 18:586–589.Google Scholar
4. Eplee, R.E. 1975. Effectiveness of ethylene in control of witchweed. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:300–305.Google Scholar
5. Goring, C.A.I. 1962. Theory and principles of soil fumigation. Adv. Pest Contr. Res. 5:47–84.Google Scholar
6. Goring, C.A.I. and Youngson, C.R. 1957. Factors influencing nematode control by ethylene dibromide in soil. Soil Sci. 83:377–389.Google Scholar
7. Gregg, S.J. and Sing, K.S.W. 1967. Chapter 1, Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. Academic Press, New York. 371 pp.Google Scholar
8. Jurinak, J.J. 1957. Adsorption of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane vapor by soils. J. Agr. Food Chem. 5:598–601.Google Scholar
9. Jurinak, J.J. and Volman, D.H. 1959. Adsorption of n-butane by kaolinite and montmorillonite: Phase changes in the monolayer region. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 23:25–28.Google Scholar
10. Rolston, D.E., Kirkham, Don, and Nielsen, D.R. 1969. Miscible displacement of gases through soil columns. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 33:488–492.Google Scholar
11. Rolston, D.E., Nielsen, D.R., and Biggar, J.W. 1971. Miscible displacement of ammonia in soil; determining sorption isotherms. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 35:899–905.Google Scholar
12. Wade, Peter. 1954. Soil fumigation. I – The sorption of ethylene dibromide by soils. J. Sci. Food Agr. 5:184–192.Google Scholar
13. Young, D.M. and Crowell, A.D. 1962. Chapter 1, Physical Adsorption of Gases. Butterworths, London, England. 426 pp.Google Scholar