Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:21:17.447Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Extraction and Separation of Chlorsulfuron and its Metabolites from Treated Plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Hank D. Bestman
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5
Malcolm D. Devine
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5
William H. Vanden Born
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2P5

Abstract

14C-chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} and its metabolites were extracted from flax (Linum sativum L.), field penny cress (stinkweed) (Thlaspi arvense L. # THLAR), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with an average efficiency of 94% using an aqueous extraction procedure. Chlorsulfuron and its metabolites were separated on a reverse-phase preparative chromatography column by eluting with a step gradient of aqueous 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and methanol. Major peaks were eluted at 35 and 45% methanol, and minor peaks at 10, 25, and 100% methanol. The 45% methanol peak represented unmetabolized chlorsulfuron or its hydroxylated derivative and was the only fraction that exhibited biological activity. In wheat and flax, 75 and 62%, respectively, of the extracted activity were eluted by 35% methanol and, in the case of wheat, this fraction was shown to be a glycosylated derivative of chlorsulfuron. Although 14C-chlorsulfuron was metabolized to a lesser extent in field pennycress, our data indicate that over 50% of the absorbed 14C-activity was recovered in forms other than 14C-chlorsulfuron 5 days after treatment. The separation procedure can be used readily to assess the amount of chlorsulfuron detoxification that occurs in plants.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Devine, M. D., Bestman, H. D., Hall, J. C., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1984. Leaf wash techniques for estimation of foliar absorption of herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:418425.Google Scholar
2. Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524530.Google Scholar
3. Hageman, L. H. and Behrens, R. 1984. Basis for response differences of two broadleaf weeds to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 32:162167.Google Scholar
4. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
5. Hutchinson, J. M., Shapiro, R., and Sweetser, P. B. 1984. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by tolerant broadleaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 22:243247.Google Scholar
6. Levitt, G., Ploeg, H. L., Weigel, R. C. Jr., and Fitzgerald, D. J. 1981. 2-chloro-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) aminocarbonyl] benzenesulfonamide, a new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:416418.Google Scholar
7. Slates, R. V. 1983. Determination of chlorsulfuron residues in grain, straw, and green plants of cereals by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31:113117.Google Scholar
8. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.Google Scholar