Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:32:58.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paleoecology and taphonomy of two new edrioasteroids from a Mississippian hardground in Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Colin D. Sumrall
Colin D. Sumrall*
Affiliation:
Frederick and Amey Geier Collections and Research Center, Museum of Natural History & Science, Cincinnati Museum Center, 1720 Gilbert Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A recently discovered series of hardground surfaces in the lower Salem Limestone (Meramecian, Mississippian) and upper Muldraugh Member of the Borden Formation (upper Osagean to lower Meramecian, Mississippian), in Hardin County, Kentucky is colonized by a hard substrate community that includes three species of pyrgate edrioasteroids. Torquerisediscus kypsi n. gen. and n. sp. differs from other edrioasteroids by bearing a cyclic pattern of twelve ambulacral cover plates and meandering distal ambulacra. Ulrichidiscus spinosus n. sp. differs from other species of Ulrichidiscus by the presence of large spines on the ambulacral cover plates, anal pyramid plates, and hydropore orals. Two small specimens are assigned tentatively to Ulrichidiscus aff. pulaskiensis.

Edrioasteroid populations occurring on several surfaces show marked differences in size frequency distribution. Three of the surfaces only have large individuals of Torquerisediscus kypsi whereas a fourth surface is colonized by only juvenile specimens of T. kypsi as well as both species of Ulrichidiscus suggesting subtle differences in environment and duration of surface colonization prior to burial. Furthermore, taphonomic pathways differ among these four surfaces with some containing only disrupted individuals and others containing only fully articulated individuals suggesting either differences in burial depth, or some differences in decomposition of edrioasteroid carcasses prior to final burial.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , January 2001 , pp. 136 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Department of Geoscience, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 52242.

References

Bassler, R. S. 1935. The classification of the Edrioasteroidea. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 93:1–11.Google Scholar
Bell, B. M. 1975. Ontogeny and systematics of Timeischytes casteri, n. sp.: an enigmatic Devonian edrioasteroid. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 67:33–56.Google Scholar
Bell, B. M. 1976a. Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic development in the class Edrioasteroidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 50:1001–1019.Google Scholar
Bell, B. M. 1976b. A Study of North American Edrioasteroidea. New York State Museum Memoir 21, 446 p.Google Scholar
Billings, E. 1858. On the Asteriadae of the Lower Silurian rocks of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Figures and Descriptions of Canadian Organic Remains. Decade, 3:75–85.Google Scholar
Chapman, E. J. 1860. On a new species of Agelacrinites and on the structural relations of that genus. Canadian Journal of Industry, Science, and Art, 5:358–365.Google Scholar
Chesnut, D. R., and Ettensohn, F. R. 1988. Hombergian (Chesterian) echinoderm paleontology and paleoecology, south-central Kentucky. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 95:102.Google Scholar
Cornell, S. R., Brett, C. E., and Whiteley, T. E. 1999. Paleoecology and paleoenvironmental analysis of an Early Devonian (Lochkovian) edrioasteroid encrusted tentaculitid hardground from eastern New York State. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 31:A–11.Google Scholar
Kammer, T. W., Tissue, E. C., and Wilson, M. A. 1987. Neoisorophusella, a new edrioasteroid genus from the Upper Mississippian of the eastern United States. Journal of Paleontology, 61:1033–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kepferle, R. C. 1967a. Geologic map of the Colesburg Quadrangle, Hardin and Bullitt Counties, Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kepferle, R. C. 1967b. Geologic map of the Vine Grove Quadrangle, Hardin and Meade Counties, Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Kesling, R. V. 1960. Hydropores in edrioasteroids. University of Michigan, Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, 15:139–192.Google Scholar
Meyer, D. L. 1990. Population paleoecology and comparative taphonomy of two edrioasteroid (Echinodermata) pavements: upper Ordovician of Kentucky and Ohio. Historical Biology, 4:155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. A., and Gurley, W. F. E. 1894. Descriptions of new species of Palaeozoic Echinodermata. Illinois State Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 6:62.Google Scholar
Rice, C. L., et al. 1979. The Mississippian and Pennsylvanian (Carboniferous) systems in the United States—Kentucky. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1110-F, F1–F32.Google Scholar
Smith, A. B., and Arbizu, M. A. 1987. Inverse development in a Devonian edrioasteroid from Spain and the phylogeny of the Agelacrinitidae. Lethaia, 20:49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1973. Morphology and Evolution of Blastozoan Echinoderms, Harvard University Museum of Comparative Zoology, Special Publication, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. 1991. Plate morphology in stalker edrioasteroids. Geological Society of America, Abstracts with Programs, 23:A–166.Google Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. 1992. Spiraclavus nacoensis, a new clavate agelacrinitid edrioasteroid from central Arizona. Journal of Paleontology, 66:90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. 1993. Thecal designs in isorophinid edrioasteroids. Lethaia, 26:289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. 1996. Late Paleozoic edrioasteroids from the North American mid-continent. Journal of Paleontology, 70:969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C. D. 1999. Spatfall accumulations and differential taphonomy of edrioasteroids in the Mississippian Borden Formation of northern Kentucky. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 32:A-421Google Scholar
Sumrall, C. D., and Bowsher, A. L. 1996. Giganticlavus, a new genus of Pennsylvanian edrioasteroid from North America. Journal of Paleontology, 70:986–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C. D., Garbisch, J., and Pope, J. P. 2000. The systematics of postibullinid edrioasteroids. Journal of Paleontology, 74:72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar