Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T03:02:16.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Folate, alcohol, ADH1B and ALDH2 and colorectal cancer risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2020

Ju Eun Seol
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women’s University, Seoul, Korea
Jeongseon Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
Bong-Hwa Lee
Affiliation:
Department of General Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea
Dae-Yong Hwang
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Jinyoung Jeong
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea
Hun-Jae Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Yoon-Ok Ahn
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Jung Eun Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Dong-Hyun Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Korea
*
*Corresponding author: Email dhkims@hallym.ac.kr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

There is limited evidence on the interaction by alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (ADH1B) (rs1229984) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) (rs671) regarding the associations of alcohol and a methyl diet (low folate and high alcohol intake) with cancer risk, partly because of rare polymorphisms in Western populations.

Design:

In a case–control study, we estimated the ORs and 95 % CIs to evaluate the associations of ADH1B and ALDH2 genotypes with colorectal cancer (CRC) and the joint association between methyl diets and ADH1B and ALDH2 polymorphisms with CRC risk using logistic regression models.

Setting:

A hospital-based case–control study.

Participants:

In total, 1001 CRC cases and 899 cancer-free controls admitted to two university hospitals.

Results:

We found that alcohol intake increased the risk of CRC; OR (95 % CI) was 2·02 (1·41, 2·87) for ≥60 g/d drinkers compared with non-drinkers (Ptrend < 0·001). The associations for two polymorphisms with CRC were not statistically significant. However, we found a potential interaction of ALDH2 with methyl diets and CRC. We observed a 9·08-fold (95 % CI 1·93, 42·60) higher risk of CRC for low-methyl diets compared with high-methyl diets among individuals with an A allele of ALDH2, but the association was not apparent among those with ALDH2 GG (Pinteraction = 0·02).

Conclusions:

Our data support the evidence that gene–methyl diet interactions may be involved in CRC risk in East Asian populations, showing that a low-methyl diet increased the risk of CRC among individuals with an A allele of ALDH2.

Information

Type
Research paper
Copyright
© The Authors 2020
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants according to colorectal cancer status

Figure 1

Table 2 ORs and 95 % CIs for colorectal cancer status according to total alcohol intake

Figure 2

Table 3 ORs and 95 % CIs for colorectal cancer according to ADH1B (rs1229984) and ALDH2 (rs671) polymorphisms*

Figure 3

Table 4 Association between alcohol intake and colorectal cancer risk according to ADH1B (rs1229984) and ALHD2 (rs671) polymorphisms* and folate intake†

Figure 4

Fig. 1. Association between methyl diets and colorectal cancer risk according to AHD1B (rs1229984) and ALHD2 (rs671) polymorphisms. The squares indicate the study-specific ORs, and the horizontal lines indicate the 95 % CIs. Models were adjusted for age (years, continuous), sex (men or women), pack-years of smoking (continuous), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), education level (less than high school, high school, and more than high school) and total energy intake (kcal/d, continuous). (a) Comparing low-methyl diets with high-methyl diets, ORs (95 % CIs) were 1·93 (1·10, 3·39) among those with the ADH1B (rs1229984) AA types, 1·51 (0·79, 2·88) among those with the ADH1B (rs1229984) AG/GG genotypes (Pinteraction = 0·58). (b) Comparing low-methyl diets with high-methyl diets, ORs (95 % CIs) were 1·36 (0·82, 2·23) among those with the ALDH2 (rs671) GG types, 9·08 (1·93, 42·60) among those with the ALDH2 (rs671) GA/AA genotypes (Pinteraction = 0·02). All the values are presented in online Supplemental Table S1. (a) , ADH1B AA; , ADH1B AG/GG; (b) , ALDH2 GG; , ALDH2 GA/AA

Supplementary material: File

Seol et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Seol et al. supplementary material(File)
File 25.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Seol et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Seol et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 231.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Seol et al. supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Seol et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 267.2 KB