Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:45:35.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sow level risk factors for early piglet mortality and crushing in organic outdoor production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2017

L. Rangstrup-Christensen*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
M. A. Krogh
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
L. J. Pedersen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
J. T. Sørensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

Piglet mortality is a major problem in organic pig production affecting both farm economy and animal welfare. Knowledge is scarce on the risk factors of piglet mortality in Danish commercial organic pig production. The objectives of this study were to evaluate season, litter size, parity, sow body condition and stillborn littermates as risk factors for early piglet mortality and crushing of liveborn piglets from parturition until castration at day 3 to 5 postpartum (pp). The study was conducted over a 1-year period in nine commercial Danish organic pig herds practicing outdoor farrowing all year round. Data included recordings on 3393 farrowings with 50 284 liveborn piglets of which 14.8% died before castration. A subset of the dead piglets were collected and necropsied to identify crushed piglets. The average number of liveborn piglets per litter was 14.8 (SD=3.7) and the average time from parturition until castration was 4.1 (SD=1.7) days. A negative binomial regression analysis was used to model the effect of the predictive variables on the early piglet mortality accounting for different time periods from parturition to castration. An increase in maternal body condition score (BCS) and parity significantly increased the risk of dying between parturition and castration. Early mortality was found to be lowest during spring (March to May) and highest during summer (June to August). Being born into a litter with one or more stillborn littermates increased the risk of early mortality. The risk factors for crushing of piglets were evaluated using a logistic analysis. A significant effect of parity and litter size was found where the odds of at least one piglet in a litter with mortality was diagnosed as crushed increased with increasing parity and litter size. In conclusion, being born during summer (June to August), high parity and maternal BCS and stillborn littermates were found to be risk factors for piglet mortality between parturition and castration. In addition, parity and increasing litter size were found to be risk factors for crushing of piglets in litters with mortality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baxter, EM, Jarvis, S, Sherwood, L, Robson, SK, Ormandy, E, Farish, M, Smurthwaite, KM, Roehe, R, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2009. Indicators of piglet survival in an outdoor farrowing system. Livestock. Science 124, 266276.Google Scholar
Berger, F, Dagorn, J, LeDenmat, M, Quillien, JP, Vaudelet, JC and Signoret, JP 1997. Perinatal losses in outdoor pig breeding. A survey of factors influencing piglet mortality. Annales de zootechnie 46, 321329.Google Scholar
Black, JL, Mullan, BP, Lorschy, ML and Giles, LR 1993. Lactation in the sow during heat-stress. Livestock Production Science 35, 153170.Google Scholar
Damm, BI, Pedersen, LJ, Heiskanen, T and Nielsen, NP 2005. Long-stemmed straw as an additional nesting material in modified Schmid pens in a commercial breeding unit: effects on sow behaviour, and on piglet mortality and growth. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 92, 4560.Google Scholar
Hales, J, Moustsen, VA, Nielsen, MBF and Hansen, CF 2014. Higher preweaning mortality in free farrowing pens compared with farrowing crates in three commercial pig farms. Animal 8, 113120.Google Scholar
Hales, J, Moustsen, VA, Nielsen, MBF and Hansen, CF 2015. Temporary confinement of loose-housed hyperprolific sows reduces piglet mortality. Journal of Animal Science 93, 40794088.Google Scholar
Herpin, P, Damon, M and Le Dividich, J 2002. Development of thermoregulation and neonatal survival in pigs. Livestock Production Science 78, 2545.Google Scholar
Herpin, P, Hulin, JC, Le Dividich, J and Fillaut, M 2001. Effect of oxygen inhalation at birth on the reduction of early postnatal mortality in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79, 510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herpin, P, LeDividich, J, Hulin, JC, Fillaut, M, DeMarco, F and Bertin, R 1996. Effect of the level of asphyxia during delivery on viability at birth and early postnatal vitality of newborn pigs. Journal of Animal Science 74, 20672075.Google Scholar
Holinger, M, Edwards, S, Illmann, G, Leeb, C, Milsova, M, prunier, A, Rudolph, G and Früh, B 2015. Improving health and welfare of pigs – a handbook for organic farmers, pp 726. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Frick, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Jessen, O 2016. Landsgennemsnit for produktivitet i svineproduktionen 2015 Notat nr. 1611. Retrieved on 16 November 2016 from http://vsp.lf.dk/~/media/Files/PDF%20-%20Publikationer/Notater%202016/Notat_1611.pdf.Google Scholar
KilBride, AL, Mendl, M, Statham, P, Held, S, Harris, M, Cooper, S and Green, LE 2012. A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowing accommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 104, 281291.Google Scholar
KilBride, AL, Mendl, M, Statham, P, Held, S, Harris, M, Marchant-Forde, JN, Booth, H and Green, LE 2014. Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 117, 189199.Google Scholar
Leenhouwers, JI, van der Lende, T and Knol, EF 1999. Analysis of stillbirth in different lines of pig. Livestock Production Science 57, 243253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, BN, Fraser, D and Kramer, DL 2002. Within-litter birth weight variation in the domestic pig and its relation to pre-weaning survival, weight gain, and variation in weaning weights. Livestock Production Science 76, 181191.Google Scholar
Oliviero, C, Heinonen, M, Valros, A and Peltoniemi, O 2010. Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Animal Reproduction Science 119, 8591.Google Scholar
Pedersen, LJ, Berg, P, Jorgensen, G and Andersen, IL 2011. Neonatal piglet traits of importance for survival in crates and indoor pens. Journal of Animal Science 89, 12071218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quesnel, H, Brossard, L, Valancogne, A and Quiniou, N 2008. Influence of some sow characteristics on within-litter variation of piglet birth weight. Animal 2, 18421849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quiniou, N, Dagorn, J and Gaudre, D 2002. Variation of piglets birth weight and consequences on subsequent performance. Livestock Production Science 78, 6370.Google Scholar
Quiniou, N and Noblet, J 1999. Influence of high ambient temperatures on performance of multiparous lactating sows. Journal of Animal Science 77, 21242134.Google Scholar
Rangstrup-Christensen, L, Krogh, MA, Pedersen, LJ and Sørensen, JT 2016. Sow-level risk factors for stillbirth of piglets in organic sow herds. Animal 11, 10781083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roehe, R, Shrestha, NP, Mekkawy, W, Baxter, EM, Knap, PW, Smurthwaite, KM, Jarvis, S, Lawrence, AB and Edwards, SA 2009. Genetic analyses of piglet survival and individual birth weight on first generation data of a selection experiment for piglet survival under outdoor conditions. Livestock Science 121, 173181.Google Scholar
Schild, S-LA, Rangstrup-Christensen, L and Pedersen, LJ 2016. Increase sustainability of organic pig production with more vital piglets. In Food futures: ethics, science and culture, pp. 98–104.Google Scholar
Sorensen, JT and Pedersen, LJ 2013. Status, årsager og udfordringer i forhold til løsning af forhøjet dødelighed hos økologiske pattegrise DCA rapport 021. Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.Google Scholar
Spicer, EM, Driesen, SJ, Fahy, VA, Horton, BJ, Sims, LD, Jones, RT, Cutler, RS and Prime, RW 1986. Causes of preweaning mortality on a large intensive piggery. Australian Veterinary Journal 63, 7175.Google Scholar
Su, G, Lund, MS and Sorensen, D 2007. Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate. Journal of Animal Science 85, 13851392.Google Scholar
Vasdal, G and Andersen, IL 2012. A note on teat accessibility and sow parity – consequences for newborn piglets. Livestock Science 146, 9194.Google Scholar
Vieuille, C, Berger, F, Le Pape, G and Bellanger, D 2003. Sow behaviour involved in the crushing of piglets in outdoor farrowing huts – a brief report. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 80, 109115.Google Scholar
Wallenbeck, A, Gustafson, G and Rydhmer, L 2009. Sow performance and maternal behaviour in organic and conventional herds. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica: Section A, Animal Science 59, 181191.Google Scholar
Weary, DM, Pajor, EA, Thompson, BK and Fraser, D 1996. Risky behaviour by piglets: a trade off between feeding and risk of mortality by maternal crushing? Animal Behaviour 51, 619624.Google Scholar
Weber, R, Keil, NM, Fehr, M and Horat, R 2009. Factors affecting piglet mortality in loose farrowing systems on commercial farms. Livestock Science 124, 216222.Google Scholar
Wegner, K, Lambertz, C, Das, G, Reiner, G and Gauly, M 2014. Climatic effects on sow fertility and piglet survival under influence of a moderate climate. Animal 8, 15261533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wientjes, JGM, Soede, NM, van der Peet-Schwering, CMC, van den Brand, H and Kemp, B 2012. Piglet uniformity and mortality in large organic litters: effects of parity and pre-mating diet composition. Livestock Science 144, 218229.Google Scholar
Wulbers-Mindermann, M, Algers, B, Berg, C, Lundeheim, N and Sigvardsson, J 2002. Primiparous and multiparous maternal ability in sows in relation to indoor and outdoor farrowing systems. Livestock Production Science 73, 285297.Google Scholar