Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T19:45:43.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imprinting with Chemical Sensors - Challenges in Molecular Recognition and Universal Application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Franz L. Dickert
Affiliation:
Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Vienna University, Waehringer Strasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Peter A. Lieberzeit
Affiliation:
Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Vienna University, Waehringer Strasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Sylwia Gazda-Miarecka
Affiliation:
Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Vienna University, Waehringer Strasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Konstantin Halikias
Affiliation:
Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Vienna University, Waehringer Strasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Roland Bindeus
Affiliation:
Institute of Analytical Chemistry, Vienna University, Waehringer Strasse 38, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Get access

Abstract

Molecular imprinting leads to functional polymers that are capable to incorporate the template used and thus lead to selective chemical sensor systems when combined with a suitable transducer. Benzene and xylene can e.g. be distinguished with a selectivity factor of nearly ten using mass-sensitive devices such as QCM and SAW, although they both contain an aromatic system and differ only by the methyl groups. Sensing materials are further tuned by using binary mixtures as templates. When analyzing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) by fluorescence and QCM measurements, the sensitivity is substantially increased if a second template molecule is applied as a porogen. Capacitive sensor measurements on polymers imprinted with microorganisms, such as yeasts, show substantial sensor responses due to highly selective inclusion compared with a non-functionalised surface yielding only negligible effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wulff, G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 18121832 (1995).Google Scholar
2. Haupt, K., Mosbach, K., Chem. Rev. 100, 24952504 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Dickert, F. L., Tortschanoff, M., Bulst, W.-E., Fischerauer, G., Anal. Chem. 71, 45594563 (1999).Google Scholar
4. Dickert, F. L., Achatz., P., Halikias, K., Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 371, 1115 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Dickert, F., Hayden, O., Anal. Chem. 74, 13021306 (2002).Google Scholar
6. Hayden, O., Dickert, F., Adv. Mater. 13, 14801483 (2001).Google Scholar
7. Hayden, O., Bindeus, R., Dickert, F., Meas. Sci. Technol. 14, 18761881 (2003).Google Scholar