Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:12:43.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Florpyrauxifen-benzyl Weed Control Spectrum and Tank-Mix Compatibility with other Commonly Applied Herbicides in Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

M. Ryan Miller  and
Jason K. Norsworthy
M. Ryan Miller*
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Professor and Elms Farming Chair of Weed Science, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
*
Author for correspondence: M. Ryan Miller, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704 (Email: mrm032@uark.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Florpyrauxifen-benzyl is a new herbicide being developed for rice. Research is needed to understand its spectrum of control and optimal tank-mix partners. Multiple greenhouse and field experiments were conducted to evaluate florpyrauxifen-benzyl efficacy and tank-mix compatibility. In greenhouse experiments, florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 g ai ha–1 provided ≥75% control of all weed species evaluated (broadleaf signalgrass, barnyardgrass, Amazon sprangletop, large crabgrass, northern jointvetch, hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, Palmer amaranth, yellow nutsedge, rice flatsedge, smallflower umbrellasedge), and control was similar to or better than other herbicide options currently available in rice. Barnyardgrass was controlled 97% with florpyrauxifen-benzyl at 30 g ha–1, ultimately reducing height (86%) and aboveground biomass (84%). In these field studies at 30 g ha–1, no antagonism was observed when florpyrauxifen-benzyl was tank-mixed with contact (acifluorfen, bentazon, carfentrazone, propanil, and saflufenacil) or systemic (2,4-D, bispyribac, cyhalofop, fenoxaprop, halosulfuron, imazethapyr, penoxsulam, quinclorac, and triclopyr) rice herbicides. Although not every tank-mix or weed species was evaluated, the lack of antagonistic interactions herein highlights the flexibility and versatility of this new herbicide. Once florpyrauxifen-benzyl becomes commercially available, it will be beneficial to tank-mix this new herbicide with others without sacrificing efficacy, so as to apply multiple sites of action together and thus lessen the risk for evolution of herbicide resistance.

Keywords

Jason Bond, Mississippi State UniversityAcifluorfenbentazonbispyribaccarfentrazoneflorpyrauxifen-benzyl (benzyl 4-amino-3-chloro-6-(4-chloro-2-fluoro-3-methoxyphenyl)-5-fluoropyridine-2-carboxylate)cyhalofopfenoxaprophalosulfuronimazethapyrpenoxsulampropanilquincloracsaflufenacil24-Dtriclopyr; Amazon sprangletopLeptochloa panicoides (J. Presl) Hitchc.; barnyardgrassEchinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv.; broadleaf signalgrassUrochloa platyphylla (Munro ex C. Wright) R.D. Webster; hemp sesbaniaSesbania hederacea (P. Mill.) McVaugh; large crabgrassDigitaria sanguinalis L. Scop; northern jointvetchAeschynomene virginica L. BrittonSterns & Poggenb.; Palmer amaranthAmaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats.; pitted morninggloryIpomoea lacunosa L.; rice flatsedgeCyperus iria L.; smallflower umbrellasedgeCyperus difformis L.; yellow nutsedgeCyperus esculentus L.; riceOryza sativa L.Barnyardgrassflorpyrauxifen-benzylRinskor™ activeherbicide resistance
Type
Weed Management-Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 319 - 325
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Neve, P (2012) Seed production of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in response to time of emergence in cotton and rice. J Agric Sci 150:171–724 Google Scholar
Baltazar, AM, Smith, RJ Jr (1994) Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 8:576–581 Google Scholar
Barnwell, P, Cobb, AH (1994) Graminicide antagonism by broadleaf weed herbicides. Pestic Sci 41:77–85 Google Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 Google Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2015) Imazethapyr co-application interactions in imadazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 29:689–696 Google Scholar
Fish, JC, Webster, EP, Blouin, DC, Bond, JA (2016) Imazamox plus propanil mixtures for grass weed management in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 30:29–35 Google Scholar
Hardke, JT (2014) Arkansas Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Cooperative Extension Service. Pp 53–62 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed October 1, 2016Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JW, Herberger, JP (1997) The World’s Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press. 609 pGoogle Scholar
Lanclos, DY, Webster, EP, Zhang, W (2002) Glufosinate tank-mix combinations in glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 16:659–663 Google Scholar
Lovelace, M, Talbert, RE, Skulman, BW, Scherder, EF (2002) Evaluation of physiological responses in quinclorac-resistant and susceptible barnyardgrass. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 55:114 Google Scholar
Mitich, LW (1990) Barnyardgrass. Weed Technol 4:918–920 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, R, Smith, K, Still, J, Estorninos, LE Jr Bangarwa, S (2009) Confirmation and management of clomazone-resistant barnyardgrass in rice. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 62:210 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powels, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide-resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 (Sp 1): 31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol 27:623–630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, WA, Nalewaja, JD (1981) Antagonistic effects of MCPA on wild oat (Avena fatua) control with diclofop. Weed Sci 5:566–571 Google Scholar
Scott, RC, Boyd, JW, Smith, KL, Selden, G, Norsworthy, JK (2016). Recommended chemicals for weed and brush control – MP44. https://www.uaex.edu/publications/pdf/mp44/mp44.pdf. Accessed: January 21, 2017Google Scholar
Tehranchian, P, Norsworthy, JK, Nandula, V, McElroy, S, Chen, S, Scott, RC (2014) First report of resistance to acetolactate-synthase-inhibiting herbicides in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) confirmation and characterization. Pest Manag Sci 71:1274–1280 Google Scholar
USDA ERS. (2017). United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/rice/. Accessed: October 17, 2017Google Scholar
Wilson, CE Jr, Runsick, SK, Mazzanti, R (2010) Trends in Arkansas rice production. BR Wells Rice Research Studies 2009. Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station Research Service 581:11–21 Google Scholar
Wilson, MJ, Norsworthy, JK, Johnson, DB, Scott, RC, DeVore, JD (2011) Response of an Arkansas barnyardgrass population to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:25 Google Scholar
Young, BG, Hart, SE, Wax, LM (1996) Interactions of sethoxydim and corn (Zea mays) postemergence broadleaf herbicides on three annual grasses. Weed Technol 10:914–922 Google Scholar