Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:28:24.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Isozyme and RAPD variation among and within hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Corey V. Ransom ,
David S. Douches  and
James J. Kells
Corey V. Ransom
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
David S. Douches
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clonal individuals from 16 hemp dogbane populations with phenotypic variation were analyzed using isozyme and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Plants originated from populations in Michigan and Illinois. Three known Apocynum species, spreading dogbane, hemp dogbane, and prairie dogbane, were evaluated. Genetic distance among populations was more pronounced with isozyme analysis compared to RAPD analysis. The combined isozyme and RAPD analysis data separated spreading dogbane from all other plants analyzed. Genetic variation was present among the 16 hemp dogbane populations, but was less than expected based on the phenotypic variation present among the collections. The short genetic distance between the 16 hemp dogbane collections and the three Apocynum species suggests that variation among populations of hemp dogbane may be from outcrossing with other closely related Apocynum species. Isozyme and RAPD analyses were also conducted on plants from two populations in Michigan to determine the level of genetic variation among plants within the same population. Genetic analysis revealed that one population was entirely clonal, while the other population was a mixture of clonal and segregating plants.

Keywords

Hemp dogbane, Apocynum cannabinum L. APPCAprairie dogbane, Apocynum sibericum Jacq. APCVEspreading dogbane, Apocynum androsaemifolium L. APCANGenetic variationpolymorphismisozyme analysisRAPD analysisAPPCAAPCVEAPCAN
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , August 1998 , pp. 408 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, 595 Onion Avenue, Ontario, OR 97914

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, E. 1936. An experimental study of hybridization on the genus Apocynum . Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 23: 159–169.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1970. Selected weeds of the United States. Pages 284-285 in Agricultural Handbook No. 336. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1991. An overview of new techniques and advances in weed physiology and molecular biology. Weed Sci. 39: 480–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balbach, H. E. 1965. Variation and Speciation in Populations of Apocynaceae in North America. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL. 95 p.Google Scholar
Dellaporta, S. J., Wood, J., and Hicks, J. B. 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19–20.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Holt, J. S. 1986. Isozyme variability and breeding systems in populations of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34: 538–543.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J., Holt, J. S., and Ellstrand, N. C. 1987. Genetic variation in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 35: 506–512.Google Scholar
Hou, Y. and Sterling, T. M. 1995. Isozyme variation in broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae). Weed Sci. 43: 156–162.Google Scholar
Karihaloo, J. L., Brauner, S., and Gottlieb, L. D. 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA variation in the eggplant, Solanum melongena L. (Solanaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 767–770.Google Scholar
Li, Q., Cai, Q., and Guy, C. L. 1994. A DNA extraction method for RAPD analysis from plants rich in soluble polysaccharides. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 12: 215–220.Google Scholar
Moodie, M., Finch, R. P., and Marshall, G. 1997. Analysis of genetic variation in wild mustard (Sinapsis arvensis) using molecular markers. Weed Sci. 45: 102–107.Google Scholar
Moucmar, A. A. and Gasquez, J. 1983. Environmental conditions and isozyme polymorphism in Chenopodium album L. Weed Res. 23: 141–149.Google Scholar
Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283–292.Google Scholar
Nissen, S. J., Masters, R. A., Lee, D. J., and Rowe, M. L. 1995. DNA-based marker systems to determine genetic diversity of weedy species and their application to biocontrol. Weed Sci. 43: 504–513.Google Scholar
Ransom, C. V., Kells, J. J., Wax, L. M., and Orfanedes, M. S. 1998. Morphological variation among hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) populations. Weed Sci. 46: 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, L. R. and Jeffery, L. S. 1972. Hemp dogbane growth and control. Weed Sci. 20: 156–159.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F. J. 1992. NTSYS-pc. Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. Version 1.7. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979. Distribution, competition, and phenology of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27: 565–570.Google Scholar
Shore, J. S. 1993. Pollination genetics of common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca L. Heredity 70: 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Pierre, M. D., Bayer, R. J., and Weis, I. M. 1990. An isozyme-based assessment of the genetic variability within the Daucus carota complex (Apiaceae: Caucalidae). Can. J. Bot. 68: 2449–2457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strefeler, M. S., Darmo, E., Becker, R. L., and Katovich, E. J. 1996. Isozyme characterization of genetic diversity in Minnesota populations of purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae). Am. J. Bot. 83: 265–273.Google Scholar
Thébaud, C. and Abbott, R. J. 1995. Characterization of invasive Conyza species (Asteraceae) in Europe: quantitative trait and isozyme analysis. Am. J. Bot. 82: 360–368.Google Scholar
Vallejos, E. 1983. Enzyme activity staining. Pages 469-516 in Tanksley, S. D. and Norton, T. J., eds. Isozymes in Plant Genetics and Breeding, Part A. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Voss, E. G. 1996. Pages 84-87 in Michigan Flora: Part III. Dicots (Pyrolaceae-Compositae). Cranbrook Institute of Science Bull. 61. Bloomfield Hills, MI: University of Michigan Herbarium.Google Scholar
Wang, R. L., Wendel, J. F., and Dekker, J. H. 1995a. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. I. Isozyme analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure in Setaria viridis . Am. J. Bot. 82: 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, R. L., Wendel, J. F., and Dekker, J. H. 1995b. Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. II, Genetic diversity and population genetic structure in glauca, S., geniulata, S., and Faberii, S. (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82: 1031–1039.Google Scholar
Watwick, S. I. 1990. Allozyme and life history variation in five northwardly colonizing North American weed species. Plant Syst. Evol. 169: 41–54.Google Scholar
Wendel, J. F. and Weeden, N. F. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. Pages 4-45 in Soltis, D. E. and Soltis, P. S., eds. Isozymes in Plant Biology. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press.Google Scholar
Whitkus, R. 1992. Allozyme variation within the Carex pachystachya complex (Cyperaceae). Syst. Bot. 17: 16–24.Google Scholar
Woodson, R. E. Jr. 1930. Studies in the Apocynaceae I. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 17: 1–212.Google Scholar