Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:43:15.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation of Cu precipitation with austenite–ferrite transformation in a continuously cooled multicomponent steel: An atom probe tomography study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2012

Qingdong Liu
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Microstructures, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
Wenqing Liu*
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Microstructures, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
Xiangyuan Xiong
Affiliation:
Monash Center for Electron Microscopy and Department of Materials Engineering, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: wqliu@staff.shu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

The copper precipitation associated with austenite–ferrite transformation in a continuously cooled multicomponent steel was examined by atom probe tomography. During continuous cooling, carbon and austenite stabilizers such as nickel, manganese, and copper were prone to diffuse into the untransformed austenite and changed the solute enrichment in austenite and its decomposition process. The redistribution of alloying elements between newly formed ferrite and untransformed austenite led to the appearance of a variety of structural components of ferrite, bainite, martensite, and/or retained austenite in the microstructure. The solutes partitioning behaviors at the migrating ferrite/austenite heterophase interface had a great effect on the nature of copper precipitation. At a cooling rate of 0.1 °C/s, the transition bcc copper precipitate was considered to first nucleate by interphase precipitation and then grow after being embedded within ferrite. The situation of the actual nucleation of carbide in ferrite had a significant effect on the size and composition of copper precipitates, as well as the segregation behaviors of nickel and manganese at copper/matrix heterophase interface.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Othen, P.J., Jenkins, M.L., and Smith, G.D.W.: High-resolution electron microscopy studies of the structure of Cu precipitates in α-Fe. Philos. Mag. A 70, 1 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Othen, P.J., Jenkins, M.L., Smith, G.D.W., and Phythian, W.J.: Transmission electron microscope investigations of the structure of copper precipitates in thermally aged Fe-Cu and Fe-Cu-Ni. Philos. Mag. Lett. 64, 383 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Monzen, R., Iguchi, M., and Jenkins, M.L.: Structural changes of 9R copper precipitates in an aged Fe-Cu alloy. Philos. Mag. Lett. 80, 137 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Monzen, R., Jenkins, M.L., and Sutton, A.P.: The bcc-to-9R martensitic transformation of Cu precipitates and the relaxation process of elastic strains in an Fe-Cu alloy. Philos. Mag. 80, 711 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Schober, M., Eidenberger, E., Leitner, H., Staron, P., Reith, D., and Podloucky, R.: A critical consideration of magnetism and composition of (bcc) Cu precipitates in (bcc) Fe. Appl. Phys. A 99, 697 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Isheim, D., Kolli, R.P., Fine, M.E., and Seidman, D.N.: An atom-probe tomographic study of the temporal evolution of the nanostructure of Fe-Cu based high-strength low-carbon steels. Scr. Mater. 55, 35 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Isheim, D., Gagliano, M.S., Fine, M.E., and Seidman, D.N.: Interfacial segregation at Cu-rich precipitates in a high-strength low-carbon steel studied on a sub-nanometer scale. Acta Mater. 54, 841 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kolli, R.P., Mao, Z., Seidman, D.N., and Keane, D.T.: Identification of a Ni0.5(Al0.5−xMnx) B2 phase at the heterophase interfaces of Cu-rich precipitates in an α-Fe matrix. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 241903 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kolli, R.P.: Kinetics of nanoscale Cu-rich precipitates in a multicomponent concentrated steel, Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, 2007.Google Scholar
10.Kolli, R.P. and Seidman, D.N.: The temporal evolution of the decomposition of a concentrated multicomponent Fe-Cu-based steel. Acta Mater. 56, 2073 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Honeycombe, R.W.K. and Mehl, R.F.: Transformation from austenite in alloy steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 7, 915 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Aaronson, H.I., Plichta, M.R., Franti, G.W., and Russell, K.C.: Precipitation at interphase boundaries. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 9, 363 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Diffusional transformations: A theory for the formation of superledges. Phys. Status Solidi A 69, 745 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Abe, T., Kurihara, M., Tagawa, H., and Tsukada, K.: Effect of thermomechanical-processing on mechanical properties of copper bearing age hardenable steel plates. Trans. ISIJ 27, 478 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Thompson, S.W., Colvin, D.J., and Krauss, G.: Continuous cooling transformations and microstructures in a low-carbon, high-strength low-alloy plate steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 21, 1943 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Thompson, S.W., Colvin, D.J., and Krauss, G.: Austenite decomposition during continuous cooling of an HSLA-80 plate steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 1557 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Thompson, S.W. and Krauss, G.: Copper precipitation during continuous cooling and isothermal aging of A710-type steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 1573 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Thompson, S.W., Krauss, G., and Tseng, C-C.: A new model of interphase precipitation in copper-containing steels. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 17, 2075 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Ande, C.K. and Sluiter, M.H.F.: First-principles prediction of partitioning of alloying elements between cementite and ferrite. Acta Mater. 58, 6276 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Mulholland, M.D. and Seidman, D.N.: Multiple dispersed phases in a high-strength low-carbon steel: An atom-probe tomographic and synchrotron x-ray diffraction study. Scr. Mater. 60, 992 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Ricks, R.A., Howell, P.R., and Honeycombe, R.W.K.: The effect of Ni on the decomposition of austenite in Fe-Cu alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 10, 1049 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Vandermeer, R.A.: Modeling diffusional growth during austenite decomposition to ferrite in polycrystalline Fe-C alloys. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 2461 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Kamat, R.G., Hawbolt, E.B., Brown, L.C., and Brimacombe, J.K.: The principle of additivity and the proutectoid ferrite transformation. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 23, 2469 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Militzer, M., Pandi, R., and Hawbolt, E.B.: Ferrite nucleation and growth during continuous cooling. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 27, 1547 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Ohtsuka, H., Ghosh, G., and Nagal, K.: Effects of Cu on diffusional transformation behavior and microstructure in Fe-Mn-Si-C steels. ISIJ Int. 37, 296 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Gagliano, M.S.: Co-precipitation of copper and niobium carbide in a low carbon steel, Ph.D. Dissertation, Northwestern University, 93, 2002.Google Scholar
27.Yu, X., Caron, J.L., Babu, S.S., Lippold, J.C., Isheim, D., and Seidman, D.N.: Characterization of microstructural strengthening in the heat-affected zone of a blast-resistant naval steel. Acta Mater. 58, 5596 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Isheim, D., Vaynman, S., Fine, M.E., and Seidman, D.N.: Copper-precipitation hardening in a non-ferromagnetic face-centered cubic austenitic steel. Scr. Mater. 59, 1235 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar