Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:19:45.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Decision Making in Face-to-Face Groups: Theory, Methods, and an Empirical Application in Switzerland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert H. Dorff  and
Jürg Steiner
Robert H. Dorff
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University
Jürg Steiner
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill University of Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents a model of decision making and introduces a new theoretical variable to the literature, namely, the modes of decision making. The theoretical focus is on the face-to-face group, and the article also develops an innovative methodology for studying this type of decision-making behavior. Variation in the decision modes is explained as a function of the strategic considerations of individual decision makers. These considerations are affected by a set of four independent variables: structure of the decision group, substance of the conflict, context of the conflict, and the decision process. The data, drawn from observations of decision-making groups in Switzerland, are tested with discriminant analysis and a simulation. In both cases total correct classifications exceed 55 percent, indicating that there is a meaningful structure relating variation in the decision modes to the theoretical framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , June 1981 , pp. 368 - 380
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachrach, Peter, and Baratz, Morton S. (1962). “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56: 947–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorff, Robert H. (1978). “Employing Simulation Analysis in Decision-Making Theory.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., and Plott, Charles R. (1978). “Committee Decisions Under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study.” American Political Science Review 72: 575–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golembiewski, Robert T., ed. (1970). The Small Group in Political Science: The Last Two Decades of Development. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, David K., Laing, James D., and Rosenthal, Howard (1976). “Prediction Analysis in Political Research.” American Political Science Review 70: 509–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, David K., Laing, James D., and Rosenthal, Howard (1977). Prediction Analysis of Cross-Classifications. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara (1979). “Twenty-One Variables Beyond the Size of Winning Coalitions.” Journal of Politics 41: 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, George C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Samuel A. (1976). Introduction to Special Issue on Small Group Theory, American Behavioral Scientist 20: 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, Franz, and Schatte, Hans Gerd (1976). “The Economic Theory of Politics: Suggestions for Reconsideration.” In Barry, Brian (ed.), Power and Political Theory: Some European Perspectives. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
MacCrimmon, Kenneth R., and Messick, David M. (1976). “A Framework for Social Motives.” Behavioral Science 21: 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, and Dorff, Robert H. (1980a). “Decision by Interpretation: A New Concept for an Often Overlooked Decision Mode.” British Journal of Political Science 10: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, and Dorff, Robert H. (1980b). A Theory of Political Decision Modes: Intraparty Decision Making in Switzerland. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Terry (1976). “Voter's Paradox and Logrolling: An Initial Framework for Committee Behavior on Appropriations and Ways and Means.” Public Choice 25: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney (1961). Small Groups and Political Behavior: A Study of Leadership. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F. (1978). “Evaluating Theories of Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 554–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar