Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-14T09:45:48.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rigid-Rod Sensitizers bound to Semiconductor Nanoparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Olena Taratula  and
Elena Galoppini
Olena Taratula
Affiliation:
galoppin@andromeda.rutgers.edu, Rutgers University, Dept.Of Chemistry, 73 Warren Street, Newark, NJ, 07102, United States, 1-973-353-5056
Elena Galoppini
Affiliation:
galoppin@andromeda.rutgers.edu, Rutgers University, Chemistry Department, 73 Warren Street, Newark, NJ, 07102, United States
Get access

Abstract

A series of “rigid-rod” dyes with an organic chromophore (pyrene or coumarin) attached through an oligophenylenethynylene (OPE) rigid bridge, linear or branched, to an anchoring isopthalic acid unit (Ipa) were synthesized and studied for solar cells (DSSCs) applications. The new dyes were attached to metal oxide (MOn = TiO2, ZrO2 and ZnO) nanoparticles films via the two COOH binding groups on the Ipa unit to investigate their binding and photophysical properties at the semiconductor surface. FTIR-ATR spectra show that all dyes did bind to the metal oxide films through carboxylate bonds. Fluorescence emission on insulating ZrO2 films was employed to study aggregation of the organic rigid-rods. Studies of the pyrene rigid-rods in solar cells showed near quantitative conversation of absorbed photons into electricity.

Keywords

photovoltaiccolloidsemiconducting
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1031: Symposium H – Nanostructured Solar Cells , 2007 , 1031-H09-50
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kalyanasundaram, K. and Grätzel, M., Coord. Chem. Rev. 77, 347 (1998).Google Scholar
2. Galoppini, E., Coord. Chem. Rev. 248, 1283 (2004).10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.016Google Scholar
3. Wang, D., Schlegel, J. M., and Galoppini, E., Tetrahedron 58, 6027 (2002).10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00586-0Google Scholar
4. Taratula, O., Rochford, J., Piotrowiak, P., Galoppini, E., Carlisle, R. A. and Meyer, G. J., J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 15734 (2006).10.1021/jp0623847Google Scholar
5. Taratula, O. and Galoppini, E., J. Phys. Chem. B Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
6. Heimer, T. A., D'Arcangelis, S. T., Farzad, F., Stipkala, J. M. and Meyer, G. J., Inorg. Chem. 35, 5319 (1996).10.1021/ic960419jGoogle Scholar
7. Taratula, O., Galoppini, E., Wang, D., Chu, D., Zhang, Z., Chen, H., Saraf, G. and Lu, Y. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 6506 (2006).10.1021/jp0570317Google Scholar
8. Hoertz, P. G., Carlisle, R. A., Meyer, G. J., Wang, D., Piotrowiak, P. and Galoppini, E., Nano Lett. 3, 325 (2003).10.1021/nl025946gGoogle Scholar