Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T14:09:33.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental investigation of optical snow properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Claude Sergent
Affiliation:
Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Centre d’Etudes de la Neige, 1441 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint Martin d’Hères Cedex, France
Evelyne Pougatch
Affiliation:
Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Centre d’Etudes de la Neige, 1441 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint Martin d’Hères Cedex, France
Marcel Sudul
Affiliation:
Météo-France, Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques, Centre d’Etudes de la Neige, 1441 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint Martin d’Hères Cedex, France
Barbara Bourdelles
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l’Environnement du CNRS, B.P. 96, 38400 Saint Martin d’Hères Cedex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The authors have developed an experimental device in a cold laboratory with the purpose of measuring optical parameters of natural snow depending on grain-size, impurity content and density. Snow samples were prepared from homogeneous layers in order to measure the radiative properties of clearly identified snow types. The first part of this paper describes the working assumptions and the experimental device. In the second part, experiment results are described and discussed. We have compared albedo measurements of different natural snow types with theoretical values derived from physical optics, based on Mie scattering. The albedo evolution of three different snow types submitted to temperature-gradient metamorphism is analyzed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1993

Introduction

Solar radiation is important and often the main energy source involved in the snow-energy balance. Therefore knowledge of interactions between radiation and snow is fundamental. The accurate determination of optical and physical parameters of different snow types is necessary to use in snow-cover modelling and consequently is an important parameter in the climate change scenario. Moreover, the relationship between grain-size, impurity content and spectral albedo of snow has to be known to improve remote-sensing techniques of snow cover.

At the snow-atmosphere interface, incident radiation is partly back-scattered and partly absorbed by snow. For the spectral range Δλ if FiΔλ is the incident flux and FrΔλ is the back-scattered flux by snow, the spectral reflectance can be defined as:

AΔλ is an optical parameter of snow and it depends on wavelength, grain-size and impurity content, especially carbon-soot (Reference WarrenWarren, 1984). Snow density has no direct effect on ΑΔλ . Theoretical formulations exist which are based on different methods:

Two fluxes modeling deduced from tranfer equation (Reference Dunkle and BevansDunkle and Bevans, 1956; Reference Giddings and LachapelleGidding and Lachapelle, 1961).

Physical modelling deduced from optical geometry (Reference Bohren and Barkstrom.Bohren and Barkstrom, 1974).

Scattering of electromagnetic waves by short particules with Mie theory (Reference Wiscombe and WarrenWiscombe and Warren, 1980).

In all the computations made with these methods, the snow representation is far from the reality. Wiscombe and Warren modelling is based on spherical ice grains, and so is quite in agreement with some real snow grains such as rounded grains, but not with other snow types. Moreover the grain bonds are not taken in account. Thus, experimental investigations on all types of snow are necessary to get accurate optical parameters values.

Literature on experimental data is in general not accurate for the following reasons:

accurate field measurements are very difficult to obtain;

snow-crystal types and sizes are usually described in a subjective and simplified manner;

impurity contents, especially carbon-soot, are rarely quantified (Reference MellorMellor, 1965;Reference O'Brien and Munis O’Brien and Munis, 1975; Reference Grenfell and MaykutGrenfell and Maykut, 1977; Reference Kuhn and SiogasKuhn and Sioga, 1978;Reference Bolsenga Bolsenga, 1983).

To complete these data, we used from 1982 to 1985 an experimental device which measured extinction coefficients of natural snow according to the Bohren and Barkstrom formulation (Reference Sergent, Chevrand, Lafeuille and MarboutySergent and others, 1987). This device was not accurate for spectral albedo measurements, and therefore, since 1986, in connection with works concerning physical snow cover model CROCUS (Reference Brun, Martin, Simon, Gendre and ColeouBrun and others, 1989), we have developed a second experimental device which allows us to measure spectral albedo and extinction coefficient with 10 nanometers spectral resolution on the 400–1000 nm band.

These investigations were principally conducted during the 1989/90 and 1990/91 winters on natural snow collected at different locations of the Alps in Grenoble area. Some experiments used snow directly collected from snow-pack layers; others used snow samples submitted to controlled metamorphism in a cold laboratory.

Experimental Device

As a working assumption we considered snow as a semi-infinite medium, and we studied the interaction between snow and radiation under diffuse illumination. The physical part of the device was placed in a cold laboratory. The measurement devices were set outside the cold room in order to protect electronic components from low temperatures. Furthermore, snow-crystal types of each snow sample were identified, and an original method was used to determine an objective factor size. The density and carbon-soot contents of snow were also measured.

Experiments were conducted in a cold room at a temperature of about −10°C. Diffuse illumination was obtained from a quartz tungsten halogen lamp of 250 W mounted in an aperture of an integrating sphere of 762 mm diameter. The inner sphere surface was coated with an Eastman 6080 white reflectance coating which has an albedo of 0.995 in the spectral range 400–1000 nm. The light emitted by the lamp undergoes multiple back-scattering in the inner sphere surface, resulting in a diffuse illumination. The snow samples were placed at a 90° angle to the light source in an aperture of 152 mm diameter.

Measurements

A lens mounted in a collimating beam probe and facing the snow sample was set on the integrating sphere. It collected light back-scattered by the snow sample (theoretical acceptance angle of 8°). The flux was transmitted by an optic fibre (6 mm diameter and 60° acceptance angle) outside the cold laboratory to a monochromator. In order to avoid direct illumination of the snow sample and lens by the light source, baffles were placed between the lamp and the apertures of the lens and the snow sample (Fig. 1a). To limit errors introduced by the uncertainty of the lens acceptance angle and by other components of the experimental device, we used calibration curves for the albedo measurements. They were deduced, for each 10 nm wavelength band, from the back-scattered flux measured on four diffuse reflectance standards of spectralon product. These values were 0.99, 0.80, 0.60 and 0.40 for the spectral range investigated. For each curve the equation is:

Ax is the albedo for a surface x, Frx is the measured back-scattered flux for a surface x, and Fr& is the measured back-scattered flux for the reflectance standard 0.99.

To get the albedo Ax of a snow sample, back-scattered flux measurements of snow samples were made alternately with measurements of back-scattered fluxes by the reflectance standard 0.99. This method was applied on reflectance standards. It showed a variability less than 2% for measured albedos over the spectral range under investigation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1. Experimental device, (a) Upper view of apparatus located in the cold laboratory, (b) Apparatus located outside the cold laboratory.

Fig. 2. Theoretical albedo of reflectance standards plotted against measured albedo for two wavelengths.

The back-scattered flux from the snow samples was transmitted through the optic fibres outside the cold laboratory, which connected with a grating monochro-mator delivering output fluxes over 10 nm wavelength bands. These fluxes were then measured by a photo-multiplier connected to a radiometric and high-voltage supply system. A micro-computer managed the step-by-step and filter motors of the monochromator, and the radiometric measurement system. Radiometric measure-ments were then recorded automatically (Fig.1b).

Sampling method

Different natural snow types were collected during winter or spring. They were taken from homogeneous layers and brought back to the cold laboratory into large isotherm boxes. They were stocked at a temperature of about 20°C for many days without any damage. To measure their radiative properties, snow samples were placed into large cylindric samplers (152 mm diameter and 250 mm long), with the inner surface coated with a Duraflect product which has a reflectance of about 0.99 on the working spectral range. These features appear to be in quite good agreement with the semi-infinite assumption. The samplers were filled up by sifting snow through a screen of 4 mm mesh, assuring a random crystal orientation and a reasonable homogeneity of the snow density.

Some parts of the experimental device do not agree perfectly with theoretical assumption:

Incident light is not perfectly diffuse.

Samples have finite sizes and the inner surface of the samples have a high reflectance but not equal to 1.

Subsequently, a part of the radiation is absorbed by the inner sides of the sampler so that an albedo underestimation can be expected.

Physical characterization of snow

Most authors do not specify how they measure grain-sizes. For spherical ice crystals, Reference Raymond and TusimaRaymond and Tushima (1979) observed that in saturated snow, the cumulative distribution of particule diameters had the same pattern with increasing time. Reference BrunBrun (1989), observed the same pattern for clusters of non-spherical grains. In this case, each grain which can be seen along the circumference of the cluster is considered as a single grain. With the assumption that this behaviour can be applied to other snow types, mean volume or mean diameter of a snow sample can be chosen as a representative size factor of a snow type. In our investigations, we used a picture-analysis system developed in our laboratory. It computes the mean convex radius of curvature of randomly chosen clusters corresponding to a sample of about 60 or 80 different crystals. For each snow sample, we computed the mean convex radius as an objective snow-factor size. We attempted to get a relationship between the mean convex diameters and theoretical spherical grain diameters according to Wiscombe and Warren modeling. In this way, we used mean spectral values in the 980–1000 nm band. For this spectral range, reflectance only depends on the grain-size for carbon-soot content less than 1 ppmw (Reference Wiscombe and WarrenWiscombe and Warren, 1980). The theoretical diameter is defined as the diameter of the spherical grains which have an albedo value equal to the measured one for the 980–1000 nm band. In Figure 3, we have plotted theoretical diameter values against measured mean convex diameters. The relationship between the two parameters can be expressed as a polynomial regression of the second degree. From now, we deduce the theoretical diameter from the measured mean convex diameter according to this relationship. Each investigated snow sample was analysed in order to determine carbon-soot content which strongly alters optical parameters on the visible part of the spectrum (Reference WarrenWarren, 1984). The analyses were made by Coulometric titration (Reference Cachier, Bremond and Buat–Menard.Cachier, 1989).

Fig. 3. Relationship between mean convex diameters and theoretical diameters derived with Wiscombe and Warren model. (Data of the whole experiments are plotted.)

Results

Up to the present, about 70 snow samples have been investigated. We measured optical parameters values for different natural snow types collected in the field, and for different steps of metamorphism conducted in a cold laboratory.

Albedo of different snow types

The experimental albedo values of four different natural snow types are compared with theorical values derived with the Wiscombe and Warren model (Fig. 4). The grain-sizes of the four different snow types analyzed show distinct curves, especially in the near-infrared spectrum, but with the same shapes. Experimental and theoretical values are very close. But in the visible spectrum, the theoretical values are lower than the experimental ones for most of the snow samples investigated. This general behaviour is probably the consequence of the physical features of carbon-soot used in the model. The characteristics of the snow investigated appear in Table 1. The theoretical diameter deduced from the measured mean convex diameter allows a good agreement between the experimental results and the theoretical computations, so it can be used as an objective factor size.

Table 1 Τable 1. Physical features of the snow investigated in the first experiment (different snow types)

Fig. 4. Albedo curves of four different snow types (Exp.) compared with Wiscombe and Warren data modeling (WW), (a) Fragmented precipitation particles, (b) Rounded grains, (c) Depth hoar, (d) Clustered rounded grains. On each figure, in regard of the used lines, theoretical diameter (mm) and carbon-soot content (ppmw) are plotted.

Fig. 5. Typical shapes of snow grains at the different metamorphism steps used on Figure 6c and d. First column: rounded grains and fragmented precipitation particles. Second column: rounded grains. Third column: fragmented precipitation particles. General scale is noted on the upper left of the picture. Different scales are noted on the relevant photographs.

Temperature-gradient metamorphism

Table 2 Physical features of the investigated snow in the second experiment (temperature gradient)

*The theoretical dimeter is deduced from the regression curve of Figure 2.

Three different snow types were submitted to a high temperature-gradient metamorphism until they reached depth-hoar shape. Temperature-gradient was applied to large snow quantities, allowing snow samples to be taken at different metamorphism steps (Fig. 5). The evolution of snow was simulated by allowing a temperature gradient of about 50 deg m−1 according to a former experimental investigation on temperature-gradient effect (Reference MarboutyMarbouty, 1980). One of the most interesting aspects of this choice was to keep impurity content almost constant. In this case albedo, especially on the near-infrared band, depends on grain shape and grain-size. Table 2 summarizes physical features of the investigated snows. Figure 6a and b shows albedo curves at the beginning and end of the metamorphism. We observe in the visible part of the spectrum a high stability of albedo during the experiments. This confirms the stability of impurity content during the metamorphism and also that grain-size has a poor influence on albedo on the visible spectrum. On the near-infrared band, albedo decreased in the case of snow originally made of fragmented precipitation particles, while it increased in other cases where snow were made of rounded or rounded and fragmented precipitation particules. This behaviour corresponds to increasing and decreasing factor size. In Figure 6c and 6d we have plotted the mean albedo on visible (540–560 nm) and near-infrared (980–1000 nm) bands at different metamorphism steps. The experimental results show a decrease for the factor size of rounded grains. This can be explained by the appearance of angular shapes during the metamorphism. Fragmented precipitation particles are inversely losing their highly developed dendritic shapes, and this corresponds to a decrease in factor size. Considering the last step of the experiment made on the originally fragmented precipitation particles, it is obvious that albedo would be of about 0.66 for the 980–1000 nm band (Fig.6d). This is confirmed by the corresponding albedo curve of Figure 6b, which shows an abnormal behaviour on the 950–1000 nm band with an albedo greater than expected from the shape of the curve. The differences between near-infrared albedo correspond to significant different sizes of the depth-hoar grains. This can be explained by the density values at the begining of metamorphism. The high density of rounded grains is certainly a limitation for depth-hoar growing (Marbouty, 1980)

Fig. 6. Albedo behaviour during temperature-gradient metamorphism for three different original snow types. (a) Albedo curves of the three original snow types, (b) Albedo curves at the end of metamorphism. (c) and (d) Mean albedo values at different steps of metamorphism on visible and infrared part of the spectrum.

Conclusion

The experimental method developed here is suitable for investigating the effect of the carbon-soot content and of the objective grain-size factor on the snow diffuse reflectance in the 400–1000 nm range. The relationship between mean convex diameters and size factors can be improved by a more advanced digital analysis system and by spectral reflectance measurements on the infrared spectral range beyond 1000 nm. A better adjustment of carbon-soot physical features can improve the theoretical results of Wiscombe and Warren modelling. Nevertheless, the experimental albedo values obtained with our experimental device can already be used in physical models of snow cover and improve the remote-sensing techniques of snow cover.

Acknowledgements

Carbon-soot content analyses were conducted by H. Cachier and J. Ducret of Centre des Faibles Radio activites, Laboratoire mixte CNRS-CEA de Gif sur Yvette, France.

References

Bohren, C.F. Barkstrom., B.R. 1974 Theory of the optical properties of snow J. Geophys. Res. 79(30) 45274535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolsenga, S.J. 1983 Spectral reflectances of snow and fresh–water ice from 340 through 1100 nm J. Glacial. 29(102), 296305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, E. 1989 Investigation on wet–snow metamorphism in respect of liquid–water content Ann. Glaciol. 13 2226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, E. Martin, E. Simon, V. Gendre, C. Coleou, C. 1989 An energy and mass model of snow cover suitable for operational avalanche forecasting J. Glacial. 35(121), 333342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cachier, H. Bremond, M.P. Buat–Menard., P. 1989 Determination of atmospheric soot carbon with a simple thermal method Tellus 41B, 379390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkle, R.V Bevans, J.R. 1956 An approximate analysis of the solar reflectance and transmittance of a snow cover J. Meteorol. 13(2), 212216.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, J.C. Lachapelle, E. 1961 Diffusion theory applied to radiant energy distribution and albedo of snow J. Geophys. Res. 66(1), 181189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenfell, T.C. Maykut, G.A. 1977 The optical properties of ice and snow in the Arctic Basin J. Glaciol. 18(80), 445463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, M. Siogas, L. 1978 Spectroscopic studies at McMurdoSouth Pole and Siple stations during the austral summer 197778. Antarct. J. U.S. 13(4), 178179.Google Scholar
Marbouty, D. 1980 An experimental study of temperature–gradient metamorphism J. Glaciol. 26(94), 303312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, M. 1965 Optical measurements on snow CRREL Res. Rep. 169. Google Scholar
O'Brien, H.W. Munis, R.H. 1975 Red and near–infrared spectral reflectance of snow CRREL Res. Rep. 332. Google Scholar
Raymond, C.F. Tusima, K. 1979 Grain coarsening of water–saturated snow J. Glaciol. 22(86), 83105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergent, C. Chevrand, P. Lafeuille, J. Marbouty, D. 1987 Caractérisation optique de différents types de neige Extinction de la lumière dans la neige. J. Phys. (Paris) 48, Colloq. C1, 361367. (Supplément au 3.)Google Scholar
Warren, S.G. 1984 Impurities in snow: effects on albedo and snow–melt. (Review.) Ann. Glaciol., 5, 177179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S.G. Wiscombe, W.J. 1980 A model for the spectral albedo of snow II. Snow containing atmospheric aerosols. J. Atmos. Sci. 37(12), 27342745.Google Scholar
Wiscombe, W.J. Warren, S.G. 1980 A model for the spectral albedo of snow I. Pure snow. J. Atmos. Sci. 37(12), 27122733.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Experimental device, (a) Upper view of apparatus located in the cold laboratory, (b) Apparatus located outside the cold laboratory.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Theoretical albedo of reflectance standards plotted against measured albedo for two wavelengths.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Relationship between mean convex diameters and theoretical diameters derived with Wiscombe and Warren model. (Data of the whole experiments are plotted.)

Figure 3

Table 1 Τable 1. Physical features of the snow investigated in the first experiment (different snow types)

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Albedo curves of four different snow types (Exp.) compared with Wiscombe and Warren data modeling (WW), (a) Fragmented precipitation particles, (b) Rounded grains, (c) Depth hoar, (d) Clustered rounded grains. On each figure, in regard of the used lines, theoretical diameter (mm) and carbon-soot content (ppmw) are plotted.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Typical shapes of snow grains at the different metamorphism steps used on Figure 6c and d. First column: rounded grains and fragmented precipitation particles. Second column: rounded grains. Third column: fragmented precipitation particles. General scale is noted on the upper left of the picture. Different scales are noted on the relevant photographs.

Figure 6

Table 2 Physical features of the investigated snow in the second experiment (temperature gradient)

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Albedo behaviour during temperature-gradient metamorphism for three different original snow types. (a) Albedo curves of the three original snow types, (b) Albedo curves at the end of metamorphism. (c) and (d) Mean albedo values at different steps of metamorphism on visible and infrared part of the spectrum.