Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:55:37.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carryover Potential of Pyrithiobac to Rotational Crops on a Mississippi Black Belt Region Clay Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric P. Webster  and
David R. Shaw
Eric P. Webster
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted on a Black Belt region clay soil to evaluate pyrithiobac injury to cotton and potential carryover to grain sorghum, soybean, and wheat. Pyrithiobac was applied PPI, PRE, POST at pinhead square, or POST at first bloom at rates of 70, 140, or 280 g ai/ha to cotton. Cotton injury was 7% or less at all rates and application timings. Cotton yield was not reduced by any treatment. The PRE application to cotton, averaged over rates, reduced yield of wheat planted in the fall compared to the POST pinhead square application or the nontreated check. Pyrithiobac at 140 g/ha applied PPI to cotton the previous year reduced soybean yield; at all other rates and timings no soybean yield reduction occurred compared to the nontreated check. Pyrithiobac at all rates applied PPI to cotton caused grain sorghum injury the following year. The 280 g/ha PPI application delayed grain sorghum maturity; however, this did not translate into a yield reduction.

Keywords

Pyrithiobac, 2-chloro-6-[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)thio]benzoic acidcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DES 119'grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. ‘Pioneer 8500'soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 5452'wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Pioneer 2548.'Herbicide carryoverherbicide persistence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 140 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, R. L., Snipes, C. E., and Crowder, S. H. 1993. Fruiting response of cotton following applications of pyrithiobac. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:48.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1993. Staple® herbicide, technical information. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, DE. 4 p.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1994. Mississippi cotton acreage, yield, and production from 1928 through 1993. Mississippi Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Jackson, MS. 193 p.Google Scholar
4. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:820–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1980. Atrazine carryover in soil in a reduced tillage crop production system. Weed Sci. 28:661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Carson, K. H., Prostko, E. P., and Chandler, J. M. 1994. Devils-claw (Proboscidea louisianica) and smellmelon (Cucumis melo var. Dudaim) control in cotton using DPX-PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:51.Google Scholar
8. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and mobility characterization of imazaquin. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hairston, J. E., Sanford, J. O., Hayes, J. C., and Reinschmiedt, L. L. 1984. Crop yield, soil erosion, and net returns from five tillage systems in the Mississippi Blackland Prairie. J. Soil Water Cons. 39:391–395.Google Scholar
10. Helms, R. S., Tripp, T. N., Smith, R. J. Jr., Baldwin, F. L., and Hackworth, M. 1989. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to imazaquin residues in a soybean (Glycine max) and rice rotation. Weed Technol. 3:513–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Henniger, C. G., Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1992. Influence of DPX-PE350 application rate and method on cotton yield and fiber quality. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:28.Google Scholar
12. Hiltbolt, A. E. and Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Influence of soil pH on persistence of atrazine in the field. Weed Sci. 25:515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Johnson, D. H., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, W. G., Talbert, R. E., and Frans, R. E. 1993. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, imazethapyr, and DPX-PE350 injury to succeeding crops. Weed Technol. 7:641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E. and McClelland, M. R. 1993. Interactions of DPX-PE350 with fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, clethodim, and quizalofop-P. Weed Technol. 7:605–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Jordan, D. L., Johnson, D. H., Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1993. Carryover of DPX-PE350 to grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and soybean (Glycine max) on two Arkansas soils. Weed Technol. 7:645–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Keeling, J. W., Henniger, C. G., and Abernathy, J. R. 1993. Effects of DPX-PE350 on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) growth, yield, and fiber quality. Weed Technol. 7:930–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1994. Soybean (Glycine max) and rotational crop response to PPI chlorimuron, clomazone, imazaquin, and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 8:224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Availability and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in soil. Weed Sci. 37:259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Majka, J. T. and Lavy, T. L. 1977. Adsorption, mobility, and degradation of cyanazine and diuron in soils. Weed Sci. 25:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Mitchell, W. H. 1991. Cotton Weed control with DPX-PE350. “A Southern Perspective.” Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:383.Google Scholar
22. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Murphy, G. P., Shaw, D. R., and Rankins, A. Jr. 1995. Flumetsulam dissipation in three Mississippi soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:227.Google Scholar
24. Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., and Tyrl, R. J. 1992. The changing weed problem in cotton. p. 117–167 in McWhorter, C. G. and Abernathy, J. R., eds., Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. The Cotton Foundation, Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
25. Peterson, M. A. and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin. Weed Sci. 36:625–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Ritter, R. L., Harris, T. C., and Kaufman, L. M. 1988. Chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron residues on double-cropped soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1968. Atrazine degradation in two soil profiles. Weed Sci. 17:202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Savage, K. E. 1977. Metribuzin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 25:55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Sims, B. D., Guethle, D. R., House, J. L., and Muyonga, C. K. 1991. Effects of DPX-PE350 on weed control, cotton yield, and lint quality. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 44:75.Google Scholar
33. Snipes, C. E. and Allen, R. L. 1992. Broadleaf weed control in cotton with DPX-PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:26.Google Scholar
34. Sunderland, S. L. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Differential tolerance of several morningglory species (Ipomoea sp.) to DPX-PE350. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:47.Google Scholar
35. Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Wiese, A. F., Wood, M. L., and Chenault, E. W. 1988. Persistence of sulfonylureas in Pullman clay loam. Weed Technol. 2:251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Effects of soil-applied AC 263,222 on crops rotated with soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar