Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:20:09.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Promotion of weed species diversity and reduction of weed seedbanks with conservation tillage and crop rotation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephen D. Murphy ,
David R. Clements ,
Svenja Belaoussoff ,
Peter G. Kevan  and
Clarence J. Swanton
Stephen D. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Environment and Resource Studies, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
David R. Clements
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC V2Y 1Y1, Canada
Svenja Belaoussoff
Affiliation:
Department of Rural Sociology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Peter G. Kevan
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a 6-yr study on four farms (36 fields) in Ontario, Canada, we tested the effects of tillage (moldboard, chisel plow, no tillage) and crop rotations (continuous corn, corn-soybean, corn-soybean-winter wheat) on emerged and seedbank weed species diversity and density. Aside from the imposed experimental treatments, all other management was generally consistent among farms. Tillage had the largest effect on weed diversity and density. No tillage promoted the highest weed species diversity, chisel plow was intermediate, and moldboard plow resulted in the lowest species diversity. These results are consistent with ecological succession theory. The increase in weed species diversity resulted from 20 species being associated with no tillage systems, 15 of which were winter annuals, biennials, or perennials. Emerged weed density was affected only by tillage. Over 6 yr, seedbank declined in no-tillage systems from 41,000 to 8,000 seeds m−3. Crop yields were not affected by tillage or crop rotation. In practical terms, reduced tillage in combination with a good crop rotation may reduce weed density and expenditures on weed management.

Keywords

Glyphosatecorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3902’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘KG 40’winter wheat Triticum aestivum L.No tillageon-farm researchsuccessionweed density; weed life history
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 69 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allmaras, R. R. and Dowdy, R. H. 1985. Conservation tillage systems and their adoption in the United States. Soil Tillage Res 5:197–222.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. 1995. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Whitcomb, W. H. 1979. The potential use of weeds in the manipulation of beneficial insects. Hortscience 14:12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altieri, M. A. and Whitcomb, W. H. 1980. Weed manipulation for insect management in corn. Environ. Manag 4:483–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, T. N. and Milberg, P. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Sci 46:30–38.Google Scholar
Andow, D. A. 1983. The extent of monoculture and its effects on insect pest populations with particular reference to wheat and cotton. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 9:25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, B. C., Lang, R. W., Robertson, E. A. G., and Franklin, M. F. 1994. Crop performance and soil conditions on imperfectly drained loams after 20–25 years of conventional tillage or direct drilling. Soil Tillage Res 31:97–118.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. 1992. Weed seedbank response to tillage, herbicides and crop rotation sequence. Weed Sci 40:654–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1993. Cropping history, tillage and herbicide effects on weed flora composition in irrigated corn. Agron. J 85:817–821.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Shaffer, M. A. 1993. Simulating resource competition in multispecies agricultural plant communities. Weed Res 33:299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, D. L., Swanton, C. J., Chandler, K., and Derksen, D. A. 1991. Changes in weed populations and seed bank through two cycles of a maize-soyabean rotation in Ontario Canada. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. —Weeds-1991 1:403–410.Google Scholar
Bilalis, D., Efthimiadia, P., and Sidiras, N. 2001. Effect of three tillage systems on weed flora in a 3-year rotation with four crops. J. Agron. Crop Sci 186:135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, A. Y. and Crossley, D. A. Jr. 1983. Comparison of soil surface arthropod populations in conventional tillage, no-tillage and old field systems. Agri-Ecosystems 8:247–253.Google Scholar
Brown, C. S. and Rice, K. J. 2000. The mark of Zorro: effects of the exotic annual grass Vulpia myuros on California native perennial grasses. Restor. Ecol 8:10–17.Google Scholar
Brust, G. E. and House, G. J. 1989. Weed seed destruction by arthropods and rodents in low-input soybean agroecosystems. Am. J. Alt. Agric 3:19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. 1995. Influence of tillage systems on weed population dynamics and management in corn and soybean in the central USA. Crop Sci 35:1247–1258.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Hartzler, R. G., and Forcella, F. 1997. Implications of weed seedbank dynamics to weed management. Weed Sci 45:329–336.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Becker, R. L., and Gunsolus, J. L. 1994. Perennial weed populations after 14 years of variable tillage and cropping practices. Weed Sci 42:205–209.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. and Hawes, J. D. 1994. Trends in tillage practices in relation to sustainable crop production with special reference to temperate climates. Soil Tillage Res 30:245–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporali, F. and Onnis, A. 1992. Validity of rotation as an effective agroecological principle for a sustainable agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 41:101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Harrison, K. 1991. Long-term tillage effects on seed banks in three Ohio soils. Weed Sci 39:186–194.Google Scholar
Cavers, P. B. 1995. Seed banks: memory in soil. Can. J. Soil Sci 75:11–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, S. A. and Aguilar, I. 1998. Weed seedbanks and corn growth following continuous corn or alfalfa. Agron. J 90:813–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D. R., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Integrated weed management and weed species diversity. Phytoprotection 75:1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D. R., Benoit, D., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Tillage effects of weed seed return and seedbank composition. Weed Sci 44:314–322.Google Scholar
Cromar, H. E., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 1999. Influence of tillage and crop residue on post-dispersal predation of weed seeds. Weed Sci 47:184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, M. R. T., Thomas, A. G., and John, E. A. 1992. Environmental factors including management practices as correlates of weed community composition in spring seeded crops. Can. J. Bot 70:1931–1939.Google Scholar
Dekker, J. 1997. Weed diversity and weed management. Weed Sci 45:357–363.Google Scholar
Dekker, J. 1999. Soil weed seed banks and weed management. J. Crop Prod 2:139–166.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A. 1991. The influence of agronomic practices on weed communities. , University of Guelph, Guelph, ON. 224 p.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A. 1996. Weed community ecology: tedious sampling or relevant science? Phytoprotection 77:29–39.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Lafond, G. P., Thomas, A. G., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: tillage systems. Weed Sci 41:409–417.Google Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., Lafond, G. P., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. The influence of agronomic practices on weed communities: fallow within tillage systems. Weed Sci 42:184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., Lafond, G. P., Loeppky, H. A., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Impact of post-emergence herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation-tillage systems. Weed Res 35:311–320.Google Scholar
Dick, W. A. and Daniel, T. C. 1987. Soil chemical and biological properties as affected by conservation tillage: environmental implications. Pages 125–147 in Logan, T. J., Davidson, J. M., Baker, J. L., and Overcash, M. R. eds. Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality. Chelsea, MI: Lewis.Google Scholar
Dorado, J., Del Monte, J. P., and López-Fando, C. 1999. Weed seedbank response to crop rotation and tillage in semiarid agroecosystems. Weed Sci 47:67–73.Google Scholar
Dyer, A. R. and Rice, K. J. 1997. Intraspecific and diffuse competition: the response of Nassella pulchra in a California grassland. Ecol. Appl 7:484–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, A. R. and Rice, K. J. 1999. Effects of competition on resource availability and growth in a native bunchgrass in two California grasslands. Ecology 80:2697–2710.Google Scholar
El Titi, A. 1995. Ecological aspects of integrated farming. Pages 243–256 in Glen, D. M., Greaves, M. P. and Anderson, H. M. eds. Ecology and Integrated Farming Systems. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. S., Christensen, B. R., and Tierney, D. P. 1994. The impact of conservation tillage on pesticide runoff into surface water: a review and analysis. J. Soil Water Conserv 49:126–135.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Eradat-Oskoui, K., and Wagner, S. W. 1993. Applications of weed seedbank ecology to low-input crop management. Ecol. Appl 3:74–83.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J. 1988. Changes in weed flora with different tillage and agronomic management systems. Pages 213–236 in Altieri, M. A. and Liebman, M. eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Froud-Williams, R. J., Drennan, D. S. H., and Chancellor, R. J. 1983. Influence of cultivation regime on weed floras of arable cropping systems. J. Appl. Ecol 20:187–197.Google Scholar
Hendrix, P. E., Parmelee, R. W., Crossley, D. A. Jr., Coleman, D. C., Odum, E. P., and Groffman, P. M. 1986. Detritus food webs in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems. BioScience 36:374–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, P. E. and Poey, F. 1985. On Farm Agronomic Trials in Farming Systems Research and Extension. Boulder, CO: Lynne Riemer Publishers. 162 p.Google Scholar
Hinkle, M. K. 1983. Problems with conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv 38:201–206.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L., Owen, M. D. K., and Buhler, D. D. 1998. Effects of crop and weed management on density and vertical distribution of weed seeds in soil. Agron. J 90:793–799.Google Scholar
House, G. J. and Brust, G. E. 1989. Ecology of low-input, no-tillage agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 27:331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, G. J. and Parmelee, R. W. 1985. Comparison of soil arthropods and earthworms from conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems. Soil Tillage Res 5:351–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, G. J., Stinnner, B. R., Crossley, D. A. Jr., and Odum, E. P. 1984. Nitrogen cycling in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems: analysis of pathways and processes. J. Appl. Ecol 21:991–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlen, D. L., Wollenhaupt, N. C., Erbach, D. C., Berry, E. C., Swan, J. B., Eash, N. S., and Jordahl, J. L. 1994. Crop residue effects on soil quality following 10-years of no-till corn. Soil Tillage Res 31:149–167.Google Scholar
Kegode, G. O., Forcella, F., and Clay, S. 1999. Influence of crop rotation, tillage, and management inputs on weed seed production. Weed Sci 47:175–183.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv 38:253–254.Google Scholar
Kremer, R. J. 1993. Management of weed seed banks with microorganisms. Ecol. Appl 3:42–52.Google Scholar
Légére, A. and Samson, N. 1999. Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage, and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weed Sci 47:112–122.Google Scholar
Liebman, M. and Dyck, E. 1993. Crop rotation and intercropping strategies for weed management. Ecol. Appl 3:92–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, G. M. 2000. Competition among seedlings of perennial grasses, subterranean clover, white clover, and annual ryegrass in replacement series mixtures. Aust. J. Agric. Res 51:377–383.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. 179 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyazawa, K., Tsuji, H., Yamagata, M., Nakano, H., and Nakamoto, T. 2004. Response of weed flora to combinations of reduced tillage, biocide application and fertilization practices in a 3-year crop rotation. Weed Biol. Manag 4:24–34.Google Scholar
Ontario Weed Committee. 1996. Guide to Weed Control. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Publ. 75. 232 p.Google Scholar
Roman, E. S., Murphy, S. D., and Swanton, C. J. 2000. Simulation of Chenopodium album seedling emergence. Weed Sci 48:217–224.Google Scholar
Schellhorn, N. A. and Sork, V. L. 1997. The impact of weed diversity on insect population dynamics and crop yield in collards, Brassica oleracea (Brassicaceae). Oecologia 111:233–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. 1996a. Weed science beyond the weeds: the role of integrated weed management (IWM) in agroecosystem health. Weed Sci 44:437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Murphy, S. D. 1996b. Integrated weed management (IWM) promotes increased biodiversity and energy efficiency. Pages 1369–1374. in Proceedings of the Second International Weed Control Congress. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Weed Science Society and European Weed Research Society.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol 5:657–663.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Clements, D. R., and Derksen, D. A. 1993. Weed succession under conservation tillage: A hierarchical framework for research and management. Weed Technol 7:286–297.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J., Shrestha, A., Roy, R. C., Ball-Coelho, B. R., and Knezevic, S. Z. 1999. Effect of tillage systems, N, and cover crop on the composition of weed flora. Weed Sci 47:454–461.Google Scholar
Swift, M. J. and Anderson, A. 1993. Biodiversity and ecosystem function in agricultural systems. Pages 15–41 in Schulze, E. D., and Mooney, H. A. eds. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. G. and Frick, B. L. 1993. Influence of tillage systems on weed abundance in southwestern Ontario. Weed Technol 7:699–705.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci 20:453–457.Google Scholar
Weersink, A., Walker, M., Swanton, C., and Shaw, J. 1992a. Economic comparison of alternative tillage systems under risk. Can. J. Agric. Econ 40:199–217.Google Scholar
Weersink, A., Walker, M., Swanton, C., and Shaw, J. E. 1992b. Costs of conventional and conservation tillage systems. J. Soil Water Conserv 47:328–334.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. G. 1988. Biology of weed seeds in the soil. Pages 25–39 in Altieri, M. A., and Liebman, M. eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effects of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seed in soil. Weed Sci 40:429–433.Google Scholar
Yiridoe, E. K., Vyn, T. J., Weersink, A., Hooker, D. C., and Swanton, C. 2000. Farm-level profitability analysis of alternative tillage systems on clay soils. Can. J. Plant Sci 80:65–73.Google Scholar
Yiridoe, E. K., Weersink, A., Swanton, C. J., and Roy, R. C. 1994. Risk efficient choice of bean-winter wheat rotation, cover crop and tillage system on light textured soils. J. Prod. Agric 7:374–380.Google Scholar