Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:08:47.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Institutional Success: The Case of Italian Regional Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Robert D. Putnam ,
Robert Leonardi ,
Raffaella Y. Nanetti  and
Franco Pavoncello
Robert D. Putnam
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Robert Leonardi
Affiliation:
De Paul University
Raffaella Y. Nanetti
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago
Franco Pavoncello
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why do some new representative institutions succeed and others fail? This article tests several hypotheses about the ecology of institutional performance, drawing on a ten-year study of Italian regional governments. Institutional success is greater where socioeconomic development is more advanced, where the political culture is participant and sociable, rather than passive and parochial, and where social stability is greater; these three variables alone account for more than four-fifths of the variance in institutional performance. Of particular importance is the impact of historical patterns of social solidarity and political mobilization on contemporary institutional success.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 55 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, G., and Verba, S. 1965. The civic culture. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Banfield, E. C. 1958. The moral basis of a backward society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ben-Dor, G. 1975. Institutionalization and political development: a conceptual and theoretical analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History 17: 309–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolissi, M.et al. 1976. La prima legislatura regional, 1970-1975. Milan: Giuffre.Google Scholar
Bin, R. 1976. Le crisi di giunta nell'esperienza delta prima legislatura delle Regioni ad autonomia ordinaria. Le Regioni 4: 425–71.Google Scholar
Cnudde, C. F., and Neubauer, D. E., eds. 1969. Empirical democratic theory. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Colombini, L. 1979. Le regioni non spendono? Bologna: II Mulino.Google Scholar
Confederazione Generale dell'Industria Italiana. 1980. Analisi delta spesa delle regioni a statuto ordinario—Appendice 1978. Bollettino di legislazione e documentazione regionale, vol. 6, n. 3: 243–312. Rome: Chamber of Deputies.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1967. The evaluation of political systems. In Contemporary political science: toward empirical theory. I. de Sola Pool, ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. 1971. The evaluation of political performance: problems and dimensions. Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics 2: 1–17.Google Scholar
Esman, M. J. 1972. The elements of institutionbuilding. In Institution building and development: from concepts to appllication. ed. Eaton, J. W.. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Fried, R. C, and Rabinovitz, F. F. 1980. Comparative urban politics: a performance approach. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Good, M. H. 1976. Policy making in the Italian regions: the formative years, 1970-1974. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P. 1978. Reforming the Napoleonic state: the creation of regional governments in France and Italy. In Territorial Politics in Industrial Nations. ed. Tarrow, S., Katzenstein, P. J., and Graziano, L.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Fargion, V. 1982. Unpublished study in progress.Google Scholar
Grew, R. 1963. A sterner plan for Italian unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, T. R., and McClelland, M. 1971. Political performance: a twelve-nation study. Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics 2: 1–18.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1965. Political development and political decay. World Politics 17: 386–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S. P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P., and Dominguez, J. I. 1975. Political development. In Handbook of political science, ed. Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N.. 3:1–114. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Inkeles, A. 1966. The modernization of man. In Modernization ed. Weiner, M.. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Jackman, R. W. 1973. Economic development and democratic performance. American Journal of Political Science 17: 611–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R. S. and Bardi, L. 1980. Preference voting and turnover in Italian parliamentary elections. American Journal of Political Science 24: 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogan, N. 1975. The impact of the new Italian regional governments on the structure of power within the parties. Comparative Politics 7: 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R. Y. and Putnam, R. D. 1981. Devolution as a political process: the case of Italy. Publius 11: 95–117.Google Scholar
Naroll, R. 1965. Galton'problem: the logic of crosscultural research. Social Research 32: 428–51.Google Scholar
Neubauer, D. E. 1967. Some conditions of democracy. American Political Science Review 61: 1002–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neufeld, M. F. 1961. Italy: school for awakening countries. Ithaca, N.Y.: New York State School for Industrial and Labor Relations.Google Scholar
Pennock, J. R. 1966. Political development, political systems, and political goods. World Politics 18: 415–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzorno, A. 1966. Amoral familism and historical marginality. International Review of Community Development 15 & 16: 55–66.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R. Y. 1980. Le Regioni ‘Misurati’. II Mulino 268: 217–45.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in administration. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Somers, R. H. 1971. Applications of an expanded survey research model to comparative institutional studies. In Comparative methods in sociology: essays on trends and applications, ed. Vallier, I.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stipak, B. 1979. Citizen satisfaction with urban services: potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review 39: 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, S. 1974. Local constraints on regional reform: a comparison of Italy and France. Comparative Politics 7: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tecnocasa, . 1975. An unpublished and untitled report submitted by the Tecnocasa consulting firm to the Lombardia regional government.Google Scholar
Town, K. W. 1973. The relationship between geographic region and politically relevant attitudes and behaviors in Italy. M.A. Thesis, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Trigilia, C. 1981. Sviluppo economico e transformazioni sociopolitiche dei sistemi territoriali a economia diffusa. Quaderni delta Fondazione Giangiacomo Feltrinelli (Milan), n. 16.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Nie, N. H., and Kim, N.-O. 1971. The modes of democratic participation: a cross-national comparison. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Walker, J. L. 1969. The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review 63: 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. 1980. Patrons and partisans: a study of politics in two southern Italian comuni. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zeller, R. A., and Carmines, E. G. 1980. Measurement in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar