Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:36:04.860Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are current fibre recommendations using NSP adequate? A comparison of Englyst and Association of Official Analytical Chemists fibre values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

M. Aldwairji ,
V. Burley  and
C. Orfila
M. Aldwairji
Affiliation:
School of Food science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
V. Burley
Affiliation:
School of Food science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
C. Orfila
Affiliation:
School of Food science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 70 , Issue OCE4: Summer Meeting, 4–6 July 2011, 70th Anniversary: From plough through practice to policy , 2011 , E156
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

The current UK recommendation for dietary fibre intake of 18 g/d is based on NSP as determined by the analytical method by Englyst(1). In the US and most European countries, dietary fibre recommendations are based on determinations using the enzymatic gravimetric method by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC)(Reference Englyst, Wiggins and Cummings2). The food industry is increasingly using AOAC fibre values for nutritional labels. Is it therefore time to revise current UK recommendations to be based on AOAC values? For recommendations to be revised, epidemiological studies linking fibre intake to health outcomes would need to be reassessed using AOAC data. One barrier to this approach is the lack of AOAC data in the McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods database(3). Some information exists between the relationship of NSP and AOAC values for some food groups(3), with a general correlation of AOAC=1.3098×NSP+0.082. However, very little information is available for the legume group. Here we present a comparison of NSP and experimentally determined AOAC values for insoluble dietary fibre (IDF) for selected legume samples (see table below). The AOAC method was adapted for the legume samples to include an efficient starch gelatinisation step (autoclaving at 126°C, 60 min) prior to digestion with thermostable alpha-amylase as described by Li(Reference Li and Zhao4).

* N, Nutrient present in significant quantity but there is no reliable information on the amount.

The results indicated that for most legumes, the AOAC IDF values were higher than IDF values by the Englyst method. This was expected due to the inclusion of a larger proportion of insoluble material such as resistant starch and lignin in AOAC IDF. However, for some legumes (e.g. red kidney beans and haricot beans), the experimental AOAC IDF values were lower than Englyst. This has been previously observed for some foods(3) and requires further investigation. The revision of fibre recommendations using AOAC may not be a straight forward process.

References

1.AOAC (1995) Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, 1995.Google Scholar
2.Englyst, H, Wiggins, HS & Cummings, JH (1982) Analyst l07, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Food Standard Agency (2006) McCannce and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, Sixth Summary Edition. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.Google Scholar
4.Li, BW & Zhao, Z (1997) J Agric Food Chem 45, 2598–2601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

*