Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:21:20.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Language of Equality in a Constitutional Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Timothy J. O'Neill
Timothy J. O'Neill*
Affiliation:
Tulane University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Like all languages, the language of American law can liberate or confine thinking. Its confining power is illustrated by the absence of the radical “group rights” claim in the Bakke litigation despite the prominence of that argument in the popular debate over affirmative discrimination. This absence establishes the limitations of the metaphor developed to give meaning to the concept “persons” in the equal protection context. While capable of investing the corporation with many of the attributes of “personhood” as defined by the Fourteenth Amendment, the metaphor makes absurd the claim of a racial group to exercise rights or privileges distinct from those of its members. This analysis illuminates the metaphorical structure of law language and concludes that the restricted range of metaphorical thinking in law weakens the law's capacity to mediate struggles over social goals.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , September 1981 , pp. 626 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedau, Hugo Adams (1972). “Compensatory Justice and the Black Manifesto.” The Monist 56: 20–42.Google Scholar
Black Law Students Union of Yale University Law School (1978). “Brief of the Black Law Students Union of Yale University Law School, Amicus Curiae, in Support of Petitioner.” In Slocum, Alfred A. (ed.), Allan Bakke versus Regents of the University of California, Vol. 3. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, pp. 353–78.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido (1979). “Bakke as Pseudo-Tragedy.” Catholic University Law Review 28: 427–44.Google Scholar
Conrad, Thomas (1976). “The Debate About Quota Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 20: 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1978). “The Bakke Case: An Exchange.” New York Review of Books, 26 January 1978, pp. 42–45.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray (1971). Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. (1976). “Groups and the Equal Protection Clause.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 5: 107–77.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1975). The Legal System. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Glazer, Nathan (1975). Affirmative Discrimination. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Heisler, Martin O. (1977). Ethnic Conflict in the World Today. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, No. 433.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod (1977). “Preferential Treatment and Ethnic Conflict in Bombay.” Public Policy 25: 313–32.Google Scholar
Kristol, Irving (1968). “Equality as an Ideal.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 5. New York: Macmillan, pp. 108–11.Google Scholar
Levi, Edward H. (1948). An introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham (1967). “Message to Special Session of Congress, July 4, 1861.” In Current, Richard N. (ed.), The Political Thought of Abraham Lincoln. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Means, Gordon P. (1972). “‘Special Rights’ as a Strategy for Development.” Comparative Politics 5: 29–61.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur Selwyn (1968). The Supreme Court and American Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Eugene F. (1979). “Metaphor and Political Knowledge.” American Political Science Review 73: 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Notice of Intended Decision, F. Leslie Mankor, Judge of the Superior Court of Yolo County, California, November 22, 1974.” In Slocum, Alfred A. (ed.), Allan Bakke versus Regents of the University of California, Vol. 1. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, pp. 165–91.Google Scholar
“Oral Arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States.” (1977). Regents of the University of California v. Bakke. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
San Francisco Chronicle (1977), 11 October 1977, p. 8.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart (1974). The Politics of Rights. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Svensson, Frances (1979). “Liberal Democracy and Group Rights.” Political Studies 27: 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1969). Democracy in America. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1971). Characteristics of the Population, United States Summary, Vol. 5. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 1–100.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1975). Current Population Reports, The Social and Economic Status of the Black Population in the United States, 1974. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Vernon (1977). “The Individual, the State and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory.” World Politics 29: 343–69.Google Scholar