Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-rxvq6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T01:02:50.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Medicine to Mobilization: Social Service Provision and the Islamist Reputational Advantage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2017

Steven Brooke
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Under what conditions can parties use social-service provision to generate political support? And what is the causal mechanism connecting social-service provision to citizen mobilization? I argue that service provision conveys to voters a politically valuable image of the provider organization’s competence and probity, which is particularly valuable when information about parties and platforms is contradictory or poor. Support comes from an in-depth investigation into the medical networks of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. I combine qualitative evidence, including fieldwork and interviews with Brotherhood social-service providers, with an original 2,483-person survey experiment of Egyptians. Respondents exposed to factual information about the Brotherhood’s medical provision are significantly more likely to consider voting for the Brotherhood in elections. A causal mediation analysis, as well as qualitative evidence drawn from the survey instrument itself, supports the hypothesized mechanism by which respondents map the Brotherhood’s compassion and professionalism in the provision of medical services onto their views of Brotherhood candidates for elected office. Beyond adding to a growing comparative-politics literature on the politics of non-state social service provision, I identify why Egypt’s current rulers have expended such effort to uproot the Muslim Brotherhood’s nationwide network of social services.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Perspectives on Politics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 42 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

al Malt, Ahmed. 1993. Risalati Ila al-Shabab [My Message to the Youth]. Dar al-Basheer al-Thaqafa wa al-’Ulum al-Islamiyya.Google Scholar
Anria, Santiago. 2013. “Social Movements, Party Organization, and Populism: Insights from the Bolivian MAS.” Latin American Politics and Society 55(3): 19–46.Google Scholar
Ayubi, Nazih. 1991. Political Islam: Religion and Politics in the Arab World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2002. “The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections.” In Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections, ed. King, Anthony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benstead, Lindsay J. 2014a. “Does Interviewer Religious Dress Affect Survey Responses? Evidence from Morocco.” Politics and Religion 7(4): 734–60.Google Scholar
Benstead, Lindsay J. 2014b. “Effects of Interviewer–Respondent Gender Interaction on Attitudes toward Women and Politics: Findings from Morocco.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26(3): 369–83.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2003. “Islamism, Revolution, and Civil Society.” Perspectives on Politics 1(2): 257–72.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa. 2011. Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa and Gillum, Rachel M.. 2013. “Religiosity-of-Interviewer Effects: Assessing the Impact of Veiled Enumerators on Survey Response in Egypt.” Politics and Religion 6(3): 459–82.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E. and Collier, David. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brooke, Steven. Forthcoming in 2017. “Egypt.” In Rethinking Political Islam, ed. Hamid, Shadi and McCants, Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo and Stokes, Susan Carol. 2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 39(2): 66–88.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. and Powell, Eleanor Neff. 2014. “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” Journal of Politics 76(2): 492–505.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4): 742–57.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2013. “When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 46(7): 851–82.Google Scholar
Cammett, Melani. 2011. “Partisan Activism and Access to Welfare in Lebanon.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46(1): 70–97.Google Scholar
Cammett, Melani. 2014. Compassionate Communalism: Welfare and Sectarianism in Lebanon. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammett, Melani and Issar, Sukriti. 2010. “Bricks and Mortar Clientelism: Sectarianism and the Logics of Welfare Allocation in Lebanon.” World Politics 62(3): 381–421.Google Scholar
Cammett, Melani and Luong, Pauline Jones. 2014. “Is There an Islamist Political Advantage?” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 187–206.Google Scholar
Cammett, Melani and MacLean, Lauren M. 2014. The Politics of Non-State Welfare. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Challand, Benoit. 2008. “A Nahda of Charitable Organizations? Health Service Provision and the Politics of Aid in Palestine.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40(2): 227–47.Google Scholar
Clark, Janine A. 2004. Islam, Charity, and Activism: Middle Class Networks and Social Welfare in Egypt, Jordan, and Yemen. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Corstange, Daniel. 2016. The Price of a Vote in the Middle East: Ethnicity and Clientelism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corstange, Daniel and Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. “Taking Sides in Other People’s Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 655–70.Google Scholar
Davis, Nancy Jean and Robinson, Robert V.. 2012. Claiming Society for God: Religious Movements and Social Welfare in Egypt, Israel, Italy, and the United States. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Dessouki, Abduh Mustapha and Ramadan al ’Abadi, al-Sayyid. 2013. al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun fi Muhafizat Misr [The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt’s Governorates]. Mu’assasat Iqra’ lil-Nashr wa al-Tawzea’ wa al-Tarjama.Google Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Magaloni, Beatriz, and Weingast, Barry R.. 2006. “Tragic Brilliance: Equilibrium Party Hegemony in Mexico.” Working Paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1153510 Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics 58(4): 1132–55.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur. 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Esposito, John L. 2003. “Introduction.” In Modernizing Islam, ed. Esposito, John L. and Burgat, Francois. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Filmer, Deon and Pritchett, Lant H.. 2001. “Estimating Wealth Effects without Expenditure Data, Or Tears: An Application to Educational Enrollments in States of India.” Demography 38(1): 115–32.Google Scholar
Finan, Frederico and Schechter, Laura. 2012. “Vote-Buying and Reciprocity.” Econometrica 80(2): 863–81.Google Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., Cuddy, Amy J. C., and Glick, Peter. 2007. “Universal Dimensions of Social Cognition: Warmth and Competence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(2): 77–83.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim L. and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2011. “The Role of Candidate Traits in Campaigns.” Journal of Politics 73(1): 61–73.Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H., and Kirk, Paul J.. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis 15(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. 2003. “Introduction: Bridging Institutionalized and Noninstitutionalized Politics.” In States, Parties, and Social Movements, ed. Goldstone, Jack A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth F. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamayotsu, Kikue. 2011. “The Political Rise of the Prosperous Justice Party in post-Authoritarian Indonesia: Examining the Political Economy of Islamist Mobilization in a Muslim Democracy.” Asian Survey 51(5): 971–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49(4): 908–23.Google Scholar
Hicks, Raymond and Tingley, Dustin. 2011. “Causal Mediation Analysis.” Stata Journal 11(4): 605.Google Scholar
Holm, Sture. 1979. “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6(2): 65–70.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105(4): 765–89.Google Scholar
Jaccard, James and K.Wan, Choi. 1996. LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Chappell and Greene, Kenneth F.. 2014. “Making Clientelism Work: How Norms of Reciprocity Increase Voter Compliance.” Comparative Politics 47(1): 61–85.Google Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2011. From Protest to Parties: Party-building and Democratization in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 2002. “Qualitative Methods in International Relations.” In Millennial Reflections on International Studies, ed. Brecher, Michael and Harvey, Frank P.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 49–64.Google Scholar
Lyall, Jason, Blair, Graeme, and Imai, Kosuke. 2013. “Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime: A Survey Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Political Science Review 107(4): 679–705.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malesky, Edmund J., Gueorguiev, Dimitar D., and Jensen, Nathan M.. 2015. “Monopoly Money: Foreign Investment and Bribery in Vietnam, a Survey Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 419–39.Google Scholar
Masoud, Tarek. 2014. Counting Islam: Religion, Class, and Elections in Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug and Tarrow, Sidney. 2010. “Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 8(2): 529–42.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2011. “Internal and External Validity.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. Drukman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H. and Lupia, Arthur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGraw, Katherine M. 2003. “Political Impressions: Formation and Management.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie and Jervis, Robert. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meng, Tianguang, Pan, Jennifer, and Yang, Ping. 2014. “Conditional Receptivity to Citizen Participation: Evidence From a Survey Experiment in China.” Comparative Political Studies, Advance Online Copy: 1–35.Google Scholar
Morsy, Soheir A. 1988. “Islamic Clinics in Egypt: The Cultural Elaboration of Biomedical Hegemony.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 2(4): 355–69.Google Scholar
Munson, Ziad. 2001. “Islamic Mobilization: A Social Movement Theory Approach.” Sociological Quarterly 42(4): 487–510.Google Scholar
Mutz, Diana C. 2011. Population-based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B., William Liddle, R., and Mujani, Saiful. 2012. “Testing Islam’s Political Advantage: Evidence from Indonesia.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 584–600.Google Scholar
Sahn, David E. and Stifel, David. 2003. “Exploring Alternative Measures of Welfare in the Absence of Expenditure Data.” Review of Income and Wealth 49(4): 463–89.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2002. “The Menu of Manipulation.” Journal of Democracy 13(2): 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald Thomas. 2002. Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Independence, KY: Wadsworth Cengage.Google Scholar
Siyam, Emad. 2006. “al-Haraka al-Islamiyya wa al-Jama’iyyat al-Ahiliyya fi Misr [The Islamic Movement and Civic Associations in Egypt].” In al-Jama’iyat al-Ahiliyya al-Islamiyya fi Misr [Islamic Civil Associations in Egypt], ed. Shukr, Abdelgaffar. Markaz al-Buhuth al-Arabiyya.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M. 1995. The Scar of Race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Springborg, Robert. 1989. Mubarak’s Egypt: Fragmentation of the Political Order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57(2): 368–77.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3): 315–25.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2011. “Embedded Mobilization.” World Politics 63(3): 434–69.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2014a. “Elite Parties and Poor Voters: Theory and Evidence from India.” American Political Science Review 108(2): 454–77.Google Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2014b. Elite Parties, Poor Voters: How Social Services Win Votes in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trejo, Guillermo. 2014. “The Ballot and the Street: An Electoral Theory of Social Protest in Autocracies.” Perspectives on Politics 12(2): 332–52.Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2005. From Movements to Parties in Latin America: The Evolution of Ethnic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2014. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, Jenny B. 2012. “Islamist Social Networks and Social Welfare Services in Turkey.” In Islamist Politics in the Middle East: Movements and Change, ed. Shehata, Samer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wickham, Carrie Rosefsky. 2002. Mobilizing Islam: Religion, Activism and Political Change in Egypt. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Zaki, Muhammad Shawqi. 1980. al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun wal-Mujtama’ al-Misri [The Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian Society]. Dar al-Ansar.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Brooke supplementary material

Appendix

Download Brooke supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 477.1 KB