Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2019). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44, 95–137. doi:10.1177/0075424216628955CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M. (2015). Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora, 10, 11–45. doi:10.3366/cor.2015.0065CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D. (forthcoming). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.Google Scholar

Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, A. V., Plonsky, L., & Teimouri, Y. (2018). The use of course grades as metrics in L2 Research: A systematic review. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 763–778. doi:10.1111/flan.12370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crawford, W. J. (forthcoming). Multiple perspectives on learner interaction: The corpus of collaborative oral tasks. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Dalman, M., & Kang, O. (2019, September). TOEFL iBT speaking scores and U.S. undergraduates’ judgments of comprehensibility, accentedness, and acceptability. Paper presented at PSLLT 2019, Flagstaff, AZ.Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. doi:10.1080/00223890802634290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., & Baker, P. (2019). Using corpus methods to triangulate linguistic analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2016). Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14, 233–273. doi:10.1515/cllt-2016-0016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M. (2015). Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 1817–1831. doi:10.1002/asi.23308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., & LaFlair, G. T. (2018). Statistics for categorical and distribution free data. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L. & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 523–539). New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Bootstrapping techniques. In Gries, S. T. & Paquot, M. (Eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Gass, S., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, B. J., & Nelson, K. (2020). Using a corpus in creating and evaluating a DCT. Applied Pragmatics, 2(1), 80–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hu, Y., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review. Second Language Research.Google Scholar

Kang, O., Ahn, H., Moran, M., & Park, S. (forthcoming). Proficiency as a mediating variable of intelligibility for accented speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Google Scholar

Kang, O., & Johnson, D. O. (2018a). Automated English proficiency scoring of unconstrained speech using prosodic features. Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody, 2018–June (pp. 617–620). doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, O., & Johnson, D. O. (2018b). US Patent Serial No. 9,947,322. Systems and methods for automated evaluation of human speech.Google Scholar

Kang, O., Kermad, A., & Taguchi, N. (under review). An interplay of proficiency and study abroad experience on prosody of L2 speech acts.Google Scholar

Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018a). Empirical approaches to measuring intelligibility of different varieties of English. Language Learning, 68, 115–146. doi:10.1111/lang.12270CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2018b). Which features of accent affect understanding? Exploring the intelligibility threshold of diverse accent varieties. Applied Linguistics, 1–29. doi:10.1093/applin/amy053Google Scholar

Kang, O., Thomson, R., & Moran, M. (2019). The effects of international accents and shared L1 on listening comprehension tests. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 56–81. doi:10.1002/tesq.463CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, D. (under review). The effects of structural priming on L2 development: A meta-analysis.Google Scholar

Keller, D., & Dronjic, V. (under review). The psychological reality of registers: Evidence from a new priming paradigm.Google Scholar

Keller, D., & Kostromitina, M. (2020). Characterizing non-chain restaurants' Yelp star-ratings: Generalizable findings from a representative sample of Yelp reviews. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larson, G. (under review). Paired-speaking tasks: The role of planning and its effects on speaking scores.Google Scholar

Lee, B., Plonsky, L., & Saito, K. (forthcoming). The effects of perception- vs. production-based pronunciation instruction. System.Google Scholar

Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22, 319–344. doi:10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lovCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsden, E., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Data, open science, and methodological reform in second language acquisition research. In Gudmestad, A. & Edmonds, A. (Eds.), Critical reflections on data in second language acquisition (pp. 219–228). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsden, E., Thompson, S., & Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 861–904. doi:10.1017/S0142716418000036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McAndrews, M. (2019). Short periods of instruction improve learners’ phonological categories for L2 suprasegmental features. System, 82, 151–160. doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKay, T., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Reliability analyses: Estimating error in L2 research. In Winke, P. & Brunfaut, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and language testing. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nicklin, C., & Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Outliers in L2 research: A synthesis and data re-analysis from self-paced reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (2018). The Bayesian revolution in second language research: An applied approach. Language Learning, 68, 1032–1075. doi:10.1111/lang.12310CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norouzian, R., de Miranda, M. A., & Plonsky, L. (2019). A Bayesian approach to measuring evidence in L2 research: An empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 103, 248–261. doi:10.1111/modl.12543CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018a). Correlation and simple linear regression in applied linguistics. In Phakiti, A., De Costa, P. I., Plonsky, L. & Starfield, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 395–421). New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018b). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34, 257–271. doi:10.1177/0267658316684904CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plonsky, L. (2019). Recent research on language learning strategy instruction. In Chamot, A. U. & Harris, V. (Eds.), Learning strategy instruction in the language classroom: Issues and implementation (pp. 3–21). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plonsky, L. (forthcoming). Quantitative research methods and the reform movement in applied linguistics. In Mohebb, H., & Coombe, C. (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Ghanbar, H. (2018). Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R ² values. Modern Language Journal, 102, 713–731. doi:10.1111/modl.12509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S., & Spinner, P. (forthcoming). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Sudina, E. (forthcoming). Second-language strategy instruction. In Mohebbi, H. & Coombe, C. (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Plonsky, L., & Zhuang, J. (2019). A meta-analysis of second language pragmatics instruction. In Taguchi, N. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics (pp. 287–307). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Measuring the effects of second language pronunciation teaching: A proposed framework and meta-analysis. Language Learning. doi:10.1111/lang.12345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shin, J. (under review). A meta-analysis of the relationship between working memory and L2 reading comprehension: Does task type matter?Google Scholar

Shin, J., Dronjic, V., & Park, B. (2018). The interplay between working memory and background knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 53, 320–347. doi:10.1002/tesq.482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sudina, E., & Plonsky, L. (under review). Language-specific grit, achievement, and anxiety among L2 and L3 learners in Russia.Google Scholar

Sudina, E., Vernon, T., Foster, H., del Villano, H., Hernandez, S., Beck, D., & Plonsky, L. (under review). Introducing L2-Teacher Grit: Evidence of construct validity and reliability.Google Scholar

Tabandeh, F., Teimouri, Y., & Plonsky, L. (under review). (Paper comparing relative contributions of aptitude and L2 grit to L2 achievement).Google Scholar

Taguchi, N., Xiao, F., & Li, S. (2016). Development of pragmatic knowledge in L2 Chinese: Effects of intercultural competence and social contact on speech act production in a study abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 100, 775–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taguchi, N., & Youn, S-J. (forthcoming). Speaking in L2 pragmatics research. In Derwing, T., Munro, M. & Thompson, R. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of SLA and speaking.Google Scholar

Teimouri, Y., Goetze, J., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Second language anxiety and achievement: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 363–387. doi:10.1017/S0272263118000311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Teimouri, Y., Plonsky, L., & Tabandeh, F. (under review). L2 grit: Passion and perseverance for second-language learning.Google Scholar

Youn, S. (2020). Managing proposal sequences in role-play assessment: Validity evidence of interactional competence across levels. Language Testing, 37(1), 76–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Youn, S., & Chen, S. (2019, March). Investigating raters’ scoring processes and strategies in paired speaking assessment. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Zhang, M., & Crawford, W. (under review). Attention to form in collaborative writing: Language related episodes in two task conditions.Google Scholar