No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
P. V. Tavanéc. O vidah suždéniá (On types of judgment). Izvéstiá Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Sériá istorii i filosofii, vol. 7 (1950), pp. 69–84. - P. V. Tavanéc. Kritika istolkovaniá prirody suždénij logikoj otnošénij (A critique of the interpretation of the nature of judgments in the logic of relations). Izvéstiá Akadémii Nauk SSSR, Sériá istorii i filosofii, vol. 7 (1950), pp. 360–372. - K. S. Bakradzé. K voprosu o sootnošénii logiki i dialéktiki (On the question of the relationship of logic to dialectic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1950), pp. 198–209. - V. I. Čérkésov. O logiké i marksistskoj dialéktiké (On logic and Marxist dialectic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1950), pp. 209–222. - M. S. Strogovič. O prédmété formal'noj logiki (On the subject matter of formal logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1950), pp. 309–317. - I. I. Os'makov. O logiké myšéniá i o nauké logiké (On the logic of thought and the science of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1950), pp. 317–330. - P. S. Popov. Prédméi formal'noj logiki i dialéktika (Dialectic and the subject matter of formal logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 1 (1951), pp. 210–218. - N. V. Zavadskaá. K diskussii po voprosam logiki (On the discussion of questions of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 1 (1951), pp. 218–222. - A. O. Makovél'skij. Čém, dolžna byt' logika kak nauka? (What should logic be as a science?) Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 179–181. - Dobrin Spasov. Dialéktičéskuú logiku nado né otricat', a razrabatyvat' (Dialectical logic should not be rejected but elaborated). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 182–184. - M. N. Alékséév. Obsuždénié voprosov logiki v Moskovskom Gosudarstvénnom Univérsdtété (Discussion of questions of logic at the State University of Moscow). Voprosy filosofii, no. 2 (1951), pp. 184–192. - A. D. Aléksandrov. O logiké (On logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1951), pp. 152–163. - F. Á. Ostrouh. Protiv iskažéniá marksizma v voprosah logiki (Versus distortion of Marxism in questions of logic). Voprosy filosofii, no. 3 (1951), pp. 164–173.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2014
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1952