Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:51:46.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of the Phonology of Spanish as a Heritage Language: from Incomplete Acquisition to Transfer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

CONXITA LLEÓ
CONXITA LLEÓ*
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg, Germany
*
Address for correspondence: Prof. Dr. Conxita Lleó, Maike-Harder-Weg 18, D-22399 Hamburglleo@uni-hamburg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study analyzes percentages of target-like production of Spanish spirantization and assimilation of coda nasals place of articulation, in three groups of bilingual children simultaneously acquiring German and Spanish: two very young groups, one living in Germany and another one in Spain, and a group of 7-year-old bilinguals from Germany. There were monolingual Spanish and monolingual German control groups. The comparison between groups shows that the Spanish of bilinguals is different from that of monolinguals; and the Spanish of bilinguals in Germany is different from that of bilinguals in Spain. Results lead to the conclusion that the Spanish competence of the bilinguals from Germany is still incomplete, and influenced by transfer of the majority language (German). Only bilingual children living in Germany show influence of the majority language onto the heritage language, whereas transfer does not operate on the Spanish competence of the bilingual children from Spain.

Keywords

assimilationbilingualismincomplete acquisitionphonological acquisitiontransferempty-transfer
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 21 , Special Issue 4: Recent developments in child bilingualism: Cross-linguistic influence, incomplete acquisition, critical periods and the advantages of bilingualism , August 2018 , pp. 732 - 747
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*My gratitude goes to the DFG and the Research Center on Multilingualism, University of Hamburg, for their support of the project E3, Prosodic constraints to the phonological and morphological development in bilingual language acquisition. The corpus data are available from the Hamburger Zentrum für Sprachkorpora (HZSK): www.corpora.uni-hamburg.de/sfb538/de_overview.html. They are available in CHILDES, as well.

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.Google Scholar
Antoniou, M., Best, C., Tyler, M., & Kross, C. (2011). Inter-language interference in VOT production by L2-dominant bilinguals: Asymmetries in phonetic code switching. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 558–570.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (2003). The stop-spirant alternation in Spanish: Converging evidence for a fortition account. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 22, 51–86.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (2014). Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish-English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 288.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (ed.) (1999). Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, New Jersey & London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. (1990). Constraints on parameter setting. A grammatical analysis of some acquisition stages in German child language. Language Acquisition, 1, 361–391.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Marinescu, I. (2010). The scope of stop weakening in Argentine Spanish. In Ortega-Llebaria, M. (ed.), Selected proceedings of the 4th conference on laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology, pp. 100–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cuza, A., & Frank, J. (2011). Transfer effects at the syntax-semantics interface: The case of double-que questions in Heritage Spanish. Heritage Language Journal, 8, 66–89.Google Scholar
de Houwer, A. (1995). Bilingual language acquisition. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The Handbook of Child Language, pp. 219–250. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fabiano-Smith, L., & Goldstein, B. A. (2010). Phonological Acquisition in Bilingual Spanish-English Speaking Children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 160–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabiano-Smith, L., Oglivie, T., Maiefski, O., & Schertz, J. (2015). Acquisition of the stop-spirant alternation in bilingual Mexican Spanish–English speaking children: Theoretical and clinical implications. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29, 1–26.Google Scholar
Flores, C., & Barbosa, P. (2014). When reduced input leads to delayed acquisition: A study on the acquisition of clitic placement by Portuguese heritage speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18, 304–325.Google Scholar
Fries, C. (1945). Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gawlitzek-Maiwald, I., & Tracy, R. (1996). Bilingual Bootstrapping. Linguistics, 34, 901–926.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1969). Spanish Phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1982). Theories of phonological representation and nasal consonants in Spanish. XIIth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, 153–168.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1984a). Autosegmental Phonology, Lexical Phonology and Spanish Nasals. Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.), Language Sound Structure, pp. 67–81. Cambridge, Mass. London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1984b). La espirantización en castellano y la representación fonológica autosegmental. Estudis Gramaticals 1. Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 149–167. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2011). Lenición de obstruyentes sordas intervocálicas en español: estado de la cuestión. Ms., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kehoe, M. (2002). Developing vowel systems as a window to bilingual phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 315–334.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Ch. W. (1970). On the Functional Unity of Phonological Rules. Linguistic Inquiry, 1, 291–306.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1995, 2nd ed.). Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2007). Determiners in bilingual German-Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupisch, T. (2013). A new term for a better distinction? A view from the higher end of the proficiency scale. Theoretical Linguistics, 39, 203–214.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Barton, D., Hailer, K., Lein, T., Stangen, I., & van de Weijer, J. (2014). Foreign accent in adult simultaneous bilinguals? Heritage Language Journal, 11, 123–150.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures: applied linguistics for language teachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological Foundations of Language. New York: John Wiley and sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A. M. (2001). Weakening of intervocalic /ptk/ in two Spanish dialects: Towards the quantification of lenition processes. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (2012). Monolingual and bilingual phonoprosodic corpora of child German and child Spanish. In Schmidt, T. & Wörner, K. (eds.), Multilingual corpora and multilingual corpus analysis, pp. 107–122. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lleó, C. (forthcoming). German-Spanish bilingualsˈ phonological grammars: permeable or resilient? To appear in Babatsouli, E. & Ingram, D. (eds.), Phonology in Protolanguage and Interlanguage. Studies in Phonetics and Phonology. Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Lleó, C., & Cortés, S. (2013). Modelling the Outcome of Language Contact in the Speech of Spanish-German and Spanish-Catalan Bilingual Children. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 221, 101–125.Google Scholar
Lleó, C., Kuchenbrandt, I., Kehoe, M., & Trujillo, C. (2003). Syllable final consonants in Spanish and German monolingual and bilingual acquisition. In Müller, N. (ed.), (In)vulnerable Domains in Multilingualism, pp. 191–220. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lleó, C., & Rakow, M. (2005). Markedness Effects in Voiced Stop Spirantization in Bilingual German-Spanish Children. In Cohen, J., McAlister, K. T., Rolstad, K., & MacSwan, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (ISB4), pp. 1353–1371. CD Rom: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Lleó, C., & Rakow, M. (2006). Nasalassimilation und Prosodische Hierarchie im monolingualen und bilingualen Erwerb des Spanischen und des Deutschen. In Mogharbel, Ch. El & Himstedt, K. (eds.), Phonetik und Nordistik. Festschrift für Magnús Pétursson zum 65. Geburtstag, pp. 95–117. Frankfurt am Main: Theo Hector.Google Scholar
Lleó, C., & Vogel, I. (2004). Learning new segments and reducing domains in German L2 Phonology: The role of the Prosodic Hierarchy. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 79–104.Google Scholar
Lozano, C. (1979). Stop and spirant alternation: Fortition and spirantization processes in Spanish phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, E. (2012a). Las consonantes oclusivas y aproximantes espirantes. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, Laboratori de Fonètica.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, E. (2012b). Las consonantes fricativas. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, Laboratori de Fonètica.Google Scholar
Martínez-Gil, F. (2001). Sonority as a primitive phonological feature. In Herschensohn, J., Mallen, E. & Zagona, K. (eds.), Features and Interfaces in Romance, pp. 203–222. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mascaró, J. (1984). Continuant spreading in Basque, Catalan and Spanish. In Aronoff, M. & Oehrle, R. T. (eds.), Language Sound Structure, pp. 287–298. Cambridge, Mass. & London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mascaró, J. (1991). Iberian spirantization and continuant spreading. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, 167–179. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. (eds.), Bilingualism across the life span. Aspects of acquisition, maturity and loss, pp. 13–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2001). The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages. Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammar. In Cenoz, J. & Genesee, F. (eds.), Trends in bilingual acquisition, pp. 11–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2004). The bilingual child. In Bhatia, T. K. & Ritchie, W. C. (eds.), The Handbook of Bilingualism, pp. 91–113. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2004). The Acquisition of Spanish. Morphosyntactic development in monolingual and bilingual L1 acquisition and adult L2 acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2008). Incomplete Acquisition in Bilingualism. Re-examining the Age Factor. [Series on Studies in Bilingualism]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. (1998). Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1, 151–171.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Forein accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45, 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Olson, D. J. (2013). Bilingual language switching and selection at the phonetic level: Asymmetrical transfer in VOT production. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 407–420.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25.Google Scholar
Paradis, C., & Prunet, J. F. (eds.) (1991). The special status of coronals: internal and external evidence (Phonetics and Phonology 2). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Patuto, M., Repetto, V., & Müller, N. (2011). Delay and acceleration in bilingual first language acquisition: The same or different? In Rinke, E. & Kupisch, T. (eds.), The Development of Grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change. In honour of Jürgen M. Meisel, pp. 231–261. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (2007). Heritage speaker competence differences, language change and input type: Inflected infinitives in Heritage Brazilian Portuguese. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 11, 359–389.Google Scholar
Smith, B. L., & Peterson, E. A. (2012). Native English speakers learning German as a second language: Devoicing of final voiced stop targets. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 129–140.Google Scholar
Wiese, R. (1996). The Phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wörner, K. (2012). Finding the balance between strict defaults and total openness: Collecting and managing metadata for spoken language corpora with the EXMARaLDA Corpus Manager. In Schmidt, Th. & Wörner, K. (eds.), Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis, pp. 383–400. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zampini, M. L. (1997). L2 Spanish spirantization, prosodic domains and interlanguage rules. In Hannahs, S. J. & Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), Focus on Phonological Acquisition, pp. 209–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar