Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:45:32.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further effects of forage on greenhouse gases estimated by DairyCant for dairy farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2015

G. Salcedo ,
A. Villar ,
J. Doltra ,
B. Fernández ,
M. Mora ,
J. Busque ,
M. Domínguez  and
R. Moros
G. Salcedo*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Calidad e Innovación, CIFP ‘La Granja’, 39792 Heras, Cantabria, Spain
A. Villar
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
J. Doltra
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
B. Fernández
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
M. Mora
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
J. Busque
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
M. Domínguez
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
R. Moros
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Formación Agraria (CIFA), 39600 Muriedas, Cantabria, Spain
*
†E-mail: gregoriosalce@ono.com
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

dairyGHG mitigationmilk productionempirical simulation model
Type
Full Paper
Information
Advances in Animal Biosciences , Volume 6 , Special Issue 1: Proceedings of the MACSUR International Livestock Modelling and Research Colloquium , March 2015 , pp. 46 - 48
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arriaga, H, Pinto, M, Calsamiglia, S and Merino, P 2009. Nutritional and management strategies on nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency of lactating dairy cattle on commercial farms: and environmental perspective. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 204–215.Google Scholar
Arriaga, H, Salcedo, G, Calsamiglia, S and Merino, P 2010. Effect of diet manipulation in dairy cow N balance and nitrogen oxides emissions from grassland in Northern Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 135, 132–139.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Kreuzer, M, O’Mara, F and McAllister, TA 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–27.Google Scholar
de Vries, M and de Boer, IJ 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128, 1–11.Google Scholar
del Prado, A and Scholefield, D 2008. Use of SIMSDAIRY modelling framework system to compare the scope on the sustainability of a dairy farm of animal and plant genetic-based improvements with management-based changes. The Journal of Agricultural Science 146, 1–17.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, R 2013. Milk production from silage: comparison of grass, legume and maize silages and their mixtures. Agricultural and Food Science 22, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, J, Oenema, O and Bannink, A 2011. Dietary strategies to reducing N excretion from cattle: implications for methane emissions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3, 414–422.Google Scholar
Merino, P, Arriaga, H, Salcedo, G, Pinto, M and Calsamiglia, S 2008. Dietary modification in dairy cattle: field measurements to assess the effect on ammonia emissions in the Basque Country. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 123, 88–94.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T, Doreau, M, Corson, MS, Eugène, M, Delaby, L, Chesneau, G, Gallard, Y and van der Werf, HMG 2013. Effect of dairy production system, breed and co-product handling methods on environmental impacts at farm level. Journal of Environmental Management. 120, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salcedo, G 2006. Uso sostenible del nitrógeno en la alimentación de vacas lecheras. Consejería de Medio Ambiente del Gobierno de Cantabria (España). Documentos Técnicos de Medio Ambiente N° 2. Cantabria, Spain, ISBN 84-935016-1-1, 263pp.Google Scholar
Salcedo, G 2011. Minimización y aprovechamiento del purín en origen de las explotaciones lecheras de Cantabria. Consejería de Medio Ambiente del Gobierno de Cantabria (España). Documentos Técnicos de Medio Ambiente, N° 7, Cantabria, Spain, Depósito Legal: SA-258-2011, 681pp.Google Scholar
Salcedo, G and Pérez, F 2014. DairyCant una herramienta orientada a mitigar la emisión de gases de efecto invernadero. III Workshop on Mitigation of Greenhouse Gasses from the Spanish Agroforestry Sector, Valencia, 78–80.Google Scholar
van Middelaar, C, Berentsen, P, Dijkstra, J and de Boer, J 2013. Evaluation of a feeding strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming: the level of analysis matters. Agricultural Systems 121, 9–22.Google Scholar
Vellinga, T and Hoving, I 2011. Maize silage for dairy cows: mitigation of methane emissions can be offset by land use change. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 89, 413–426.Google Scholar