Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:55:55.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of fermentable starch and straw-enriched housing on energy partitioning of growing pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

J. E. Bolhuis ,
H. van den Brand ,
S. T. M. Staals ,
T. Zandstra ,
S. J. J. Alferink ,
M. J. W. Heetkamp  and
W. J. J. Gerrits
J. E. Bolhuis*
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
H. van den Brand
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. T. M. Staals
Affiliation:
CCL-Research, Nutrition and Feed Research, NCB-laan 52, 5462 GE Veghel, The Netherlands
T. Zandstra
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. J. J. Alferink
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
M. J. W. Heetkamp
Affiliation:
Adaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
W. J. J. Gerrits
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
E-mail: Liesbeth.Bolhuis@wur.nl
Get access

Abstract

Both dietary fermentable carbohydrates and the availability of straw bedding potentially affect activity patterns and energy utilisation in pigs. The present study aimed to investigate the combined effects of straw bedding and fermentable carbohydrates (native potato starch) on energy partitioning in growing pigs. In a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement, 16 groups of 12 pigs (approximately 25 kg) were assigned to either barren housing or housing on straw bedding, and to native or pregelatinised potato starch included in the diet. Pigs were fed at approximately 2.5 times maintenance. Nitrogen and energy balances were measured per group during a 7-day experimental period, which was preceded by a 30-day adaptation period. Heat production and physical activity were measured during 9-min intervals. The availability of straw bedding increased both metabolisable energy (ME) intake and total heat production (P < 0.001). Housing conditions did not affect total energy retention, but pigs on straw bedding retained more energy as protein (P < 0.01) and less as fat (P < 0.05) than barren-housed pigs. Average daily gain (P < 0.001), ME intake (P < 0.001) and energy retention (P < 0.01) were lower in pigs on the native potato starch diet compared to those on the pregelatinised potato starch diet. Pigs on the pregelatinised potato starch diet showed larger fluctuations in heat production and respiration quotient over the 24-h cycle than pigs on the native potato starch diet, and a higher activity-related energy expenditure. The effect of dietary starch type on activity-related heat production depended, however, on housing type (P < 0.05). In barren housing, activity-related heat production was less affected by starch type (16.1% and 13.7% of total heat production on the pregelatinised and native potato starch diet, respectively) than in straw-enriched housing (21.1% and 15.0% of the total heat production on the pregelatinised and native potato starch diet, respectively). In conclusion, the present study shows that the availability both of straw bedding and of dietary starch type, fermentable or digestible, affects energy utilisation and physical activity of pigs. The effects of housing condition on protein and fat deposition suggest that environmental enrichment with long straw may result in leaner pigs. The lower energy expenditure on the physical activity of pigs on the native potato starch diet, which was the most obvious in straw-housed pigs, likely reflects a decrease in foraging behaviour related to a more gradual supply of energy from fermentation processes.

Keywords

energy metabolismenvironmental enrichmentresistant starchsatietystraw bedding
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 7 , July 2008 , pp. 1028 - 1036
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achour, L, Flourié, B, Briet, F, Franchisseur, C, Bornet, F, Champ, M, Ramboud, JC, Messing, B 1997. Metabolic effects of digestible and partially indigestible cornstarch: a study in the absorptive and post absorptive periods in healthy humans. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 66, 1151–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARC 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.Google Scholar
Asp, NG, Van Amelsfoort, JMM, Hautvast, JGAJ 1996. Nutritional implications of resistant starch. Nutrition Research Reviews 9, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awati, A, Bosch, MW, Tagliapietra, F, Williams, BA, Verstegen, MWA 2006. Difference in in vitro fermentability of four carbohydrates and two diets, using ileal and faecal inocula from unweaned piglets. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, Walker, N, Sneddon, IA 1995. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Animal Welfare 4, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, VE, O’Connell, NE, Kilpatrick, DJ, Moss, BW 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on welfare-related behavioural and physiological parameters in growing pigs. Animal Science 70, 443–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, JE, Schouten, WGP, Schrama, JW, Wiegant, VM 2005. Behavioural development of pigs with different coping characteristics in barren and substrate-enriched housing conditions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, JE, Schouten, WGP, Schrama, JW, Wiegant, VM 2006. Effects of rearing and housing environment on pigs with different coping characteristics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, JE, van den Brand, H, Staals, S, Gerrits, WJJ 2007. Effects of pregelatinized vs. native potato starch on intestinal weight and stomach lesions of pigs housed in barren pens or on straw bedding. Livestock Science 109, 108–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, E 1965. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy metabolism (ed. KL Blaxter), pp. 441–443. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
Canh, TT, Sutton, AL, Aarnink, AJA, Verstegen, MWA, Schrama, JW, Bakker, GCM 1998. Dietary carbohydrates alter the faecal composition and pH and the ammonia emission from slurry of growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1887–1895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Lange, C, Van Milgen, J, Dubois, S, Noblet, J 2006. Energy cost of ingesting and excreting indigestible material in growing pigs is minimal. Animal Research 55, 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Leeuw, JA, Jongbloed, AW, Spoolder, HAM, Verstegen, MWA 2005. Effects of hindgut fermentation of nonstarch polysaccharides on the stability of blood glucose and insulin levels and physical activity in empty sows. Livestock Production Science 96, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filer, LJR, Andersen, DW, Cotton, RH 1986. Effect of dietary fiber on growing pigs. In Swine in biomedical research (ed. ME Tumbleson), vol. 2, pp. 701–708. Plenum Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Fraser, DF, Phillips, PA, Thompson, BK, Tennessen, T 1991. Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrits, WJJ, Rijnen, MJA, Bolhuis, JE, Schrama, JW 2003. Influences of dietary fibre on physical activity and behaviour, and on its energy value for growing pigs. In Perspectives in pig science (ed. J Wiseman, M Varley and B Kemp), pp. 474–490. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Giusi-Perier, A, Fiszlewicz, M, Rérat, A 1989. Influence of diet composition on intestinal volatile fatty acid and nutrient absorption in unanaesthetized pigs. Journal of Animal Science 67, 386–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haralampu, SG 2000. Resistant starch – a review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3. Carbohydrate Polymers 41, 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heetkamp, MJW, Schrama, JW, De Jong, L, Swinkels, JWGM, Schouten, WGP, Bosch, MW 1995. Energy metabolism in young pigs as affected by mixing. Journal of Animal Science 73, 3562–3569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heijnen, ML, Beynen, AC 1997. Consumption of retrograded (RS3) but not uncooked (RS2) resistant starch shifts nitrogen excretion from urine to faeces in cannulated piglets. The Journal of Nutrition 127, 1828–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijnen, MLA, Deurenberg, P, Van Amelsfoort, JMM, Beynen, AC 1995. Replacement of digestible by resistant starch lowers diet-induced thermogenesis in healthy men. The British Journal of Nutrition 73, 423–432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmann, L, Jentsch, W, Schiemann, R 1990. Measurings of the energy metabolism of adult pigs after the feeding of rations with potato starch, potatoes, beets, sugar beet pulp and roughages as supplements to a basic ration. 1. Energy metabolism and energy utilization. Archives of Animal Nutrition 40, 191–208.Google Scholar
Høstmark, AT, Ekeland, GS, Beckstrøm, AC, Meen, HD 2006. Postprandial light physical activity blunts the blood glucose increase. Preventive Medicine 42, 369–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ISO 1997. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content. Kjeldahl method. ISO 5983. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
ISO 1998a. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of gross calorific value. ISO 9831. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
ISO 1998b. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of moisture and other volatile matter content. ISO 6496. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
ISO 1999. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of fat content. ISO 6492. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
ISO 2002. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of crude ash. ISO 5984. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
ISO 2006. Determination of acid detergent insoluble fibrous residue content (ADF) and lignin (ADL). ISO 13906. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, K, Thorbek, G 1993. The respiratory quotient in relation to fat deposition in fattening-growing pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 69, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, BB 1996. Methanogenesis in monogastric animals. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 42, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, BB, Jørgensen, H 1994. Effect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract in pigs. Applied Environmental Microbiology 60, 1897–1904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, MB, Kyriazakis, I, Lawrence, AB 1993. The activity and straw directed behaviour of pigs offered foods with different crude protein content. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jørgensen, HT, Zhao, ZQ, Eggum, BO 1996. The influence of dietary fibre and environmental temperature on the development of the gastrointestinal tract, digestibility, degree of fermentation in the hind-gut and energy metabolism in pigs. The British Journal of Nutrition 75, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latymer, EA, Low, AG, Fadden, K, Sambrook, IE, Woodley, SC, Keal, HD 1990. Measurement of transit time of digesta through sections of gastrointestinal tract of pigs fed with diets containing various sources of dietary fibre (nonstarch polysaccharides). Archives of Animal Nutrition 40, 667–680.Google Scholar
Martin, LJM, Dumon, HJW, Champ, MMJ 1998. Production of short-chain fatty acids from resistant starch in a pig model. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 77, 71–80.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuo, T, Suzuki, M 1999. Effects of dietary composition and exercise timing on substrate utilization and sympathoadrenal function in healthy young women. Metabolism 48, 1596–1602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J, Le Goff, G 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on energy value of feeds for pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 90, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijnen, MMJA, Verstegen, MWA, Heetkamp, MJW, Haaksma, J, Schrama, JW 2001. Effects of dietary fermentable carbohydrates on energy metabolism in group-housed sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rijnen, MMJA, van den Borne, JJGC, Schrama, JW, Gerrits, WJJ 2003. Housing conditions and carbohydrate source affect within-day variation of energy metabolism in growing pigs. In Progress in research on energy and protein metabolism (ed. WB Souffrant and CC Metges), pp. 367–370. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrama, JW, Bakker, GCM 1999. Changes in energy metabolism in relation to physical activity due to fermentable carbohydrates in group-housed, growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 77, 3274–3280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrama, JW, Verstegen, MWA, Verboeket, PHJ, Schutte, JB, Haaksma, J 1996. Energy metabolism in relation to physical activity in growing pigs as affected by type of dietary carbohydrate. Journal of Animal Science 74, 2220–2225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schrama, JW, Bosch, MW, Verstegen, MWA, Vorselaars, AHPM, Haaksma, J, Heetkamp, MJW 1998. The energetic value of nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to physical activity in group-housed, growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 3016–3023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, XS, Noblet, J 1993. Digestible and metabolizable energy values of ten feed ingredients in growing pigs fed ad libitum and sows fed at maintenance level: Comparative contribution of the hindgut. Animal Feed Science and Technology 42, 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, XS, Noblet, J 1994. Effect of body weight and feed composition on the contribution of hindgut digestion of energy and nutrients in pigs. Livestock Production Science 38, 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staals, STM, Bolhuis, JE, van den Brand, H, Gerrits, WJJ 2007. Contribution of straw bedding to digestible nutrient intake of pigs fed diets based on either native or pregelatinized starch. Livestock Science 109, 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuyttens, FAM 2005. The importance of straw for pig and cattle welfare: a review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meulen, J, Bakker, GC, Bakker, JG, De Visser, H, Jongbloed, W, Everts, H 1997. Effect of resistant starch on net portal-drained viscera flux of glucose, volatile fatty acids, urea, and ammonia in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2697–2704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verstegen, MWA, Van der Hel, W, Brandsma, HA, Henken, AM, Bransen, AM 1987. The Wageningen respiration unit for animal production research: a description of the equipment and its possibilities. In Energy metabolism in farm animals (ed. MWA Verstegen and AM Henken), pp. 21–48. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenk C, Colombani PC, Van Milgen J and Lemme A 2001. Glossary: terminology in animal and human energy metabolism. In Proceedings of the 15th symposium on energy metabolism in animals, Snekkersten, Denmark, pp. 409-421.Google Scholar