Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:04:50.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Wicked View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2017

Michael Barrett ,
David E. Ervin ,
George B. Frisvold ,
Raymond A. Jussaume ,
David R. Shaw  and
Sarah M. Ward
Michael Barrett
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
David E. Ervin
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Economics and Environmental Management and Senior Research Faculty, Institute for Sustainable Solutions, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201
George B. Frisvold
Affiliation:
Professor and Extension Specialist, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Raymond A. Jussaume
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Sociology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Professor and Vice-President for Research and Development, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762
Sarah M. Ward*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: sarah.ward@colostate.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent essay, Harker and coauthors stated that considering herbicide resistance as a wicked problem “without clear causes or solutions” ignores what weed scientists know about the biology and management of herbicide-resistant weeds. In this response, we argue that this misrepresents what is meant by “wicked” and that the wicked problem concept is valuable in understanding the multifaceted nature of herbicide resistance as a human-caused phenomenon.

Keywords

Herbicide resistanceweed managementwicked problem
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , July 2017 , pp. 441 - 443
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: William Vencill, University of Georgia.

References

LITERATURE CITED

Anonymous (2016) DuPontTM ZestTM WDG. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ldDEH000.pdf. Accessed: March 26, 2017Google Scholar
Barrett, M, Soteres, J, Shaw, D (2016) Carrots and sticks: incentives and regulations for herbicide resistance management and changing behavior. Weed Sci 64(SP1): 627–640 Google Scholar
Harker, KN, Mallory-Smith, C, Maxwell, BD, Mortensen, DA, Smith, RG (2017) Another view. Weed Sci 65:203–205 Google Scholar
Mortensen, DA, Egan, JF, Maxwell, BD, Ryan, MR, Smith, RG (2012) Navigating a critical juncture for sustainable weed management. BioScience 61:75–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(SP1): 31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H, Webber, M (1973) Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169 Google Scholar
Shaw, DR (2016) The “wicked” nature of the herbicide resistance problem. Weed Sci 64(SP1): 552–558 Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Soteres, JK, Mallory-Smith, C, Burgos, NR, Johnson, WG, McClelland, MR (2012) Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Sci 60(SP1): 2–30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar