Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:53:22.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

JAPAN'S PASSPORT SYSTEM AND THE OPENING OF BORDERS, 1866–1878*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2017

TAKAHIRO YAMAMOTO
TAKAHIRO YAMAMOTO*
Affiliation:
The University of Tokyo
*
Graduate Schools for Law and Politics, The University of Tokyo113–8654Japanjyamamot@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article sheds new light on the opening of Japan in the late nineteenth century focusing on the legalization of overseas travel and the introduction of passports. It argues that the Tokugawa shogunate introduced passports as a belated endorsement of the increasingly common practice of undercover border-crossing as it feared losing the political grip. Once the new regulation was in place, most travellers went to China or Korea as petty merchants or low-skill labourers, in part recruited by Western merchants and consuls. The foreign ministry, fearing that unrestricted emigration of labourers and mercenaries might harm the country's international reputation and political stability, limited the number of passports to distribute to the treaty ports. Japan's passport system thus focused more on regulating the overseas travel than promoting it, in contrast to the positive light in which the opening of Japan is commonly portrayed. The government largely succeeded in preventing the unwanted emigration, but never fully controlled the process because of the less vigilant port officials and the ambiguity on some of the borders' exact location. Overall, the investigation into the first two decades of the Japanese passport travellers leads to a more complex understanding of modern Japan's opening of borders.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 997 - 1021
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Mitani Hiroshi, Fukuoka Mariko, Almaz Zelleke, Mick Deneckere, Jin Li Lim, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and comments. This research was supported by MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 16J07860.

References

1 Nagasaki Museum of History and Culture (NMHC) 14–393–1.

2 Hiroshi, Mitani, Escape from impasse (Tokyo, 2006), pp. 2–3 Google Scholar.

3 On the 1635 travel ban on the Japanese, see Laver, Michael S., The sakoku edicts and the ethics of Tokugawa hegemony (Amherst, NY, 2005), pp. 29–53 Google Scholar.

4 London, The National Archives (TNA) FO881/1474 no2, Parkes to Clarendon, 27 June 1866.

5 Other early examples were Vladivostok, Pusan, and San Francisco.

6 For the study of the experience of Japanese students in this period, see Cobbing, Andrew, Japanese discovery of Victorian Britain: early travel encounters in the far west (Richmond, 1998)Google Scholar; Cobbing, Andrew, The Satsuma students in Britain (Richmond, 2000)Google Scholar; Takaaki, Inuzuka, Satsumahan eikoku ryūgakusei (Tokyo, 1971)Google Scholar. On castaways, see Van Sant, John E., Pacific pioneers: Japanese journeys to America and Hawaii, 1850–1880 (Urbana, IL, 2000)Google Scholar; on prostitutes and trafficked persons, representative works are Tomoko, Yamazaki, Sandakan hachiban shōkan: teihen joseishi joshō (Tokyo, 1972)Google Scholar; Warren, James, Ah ku and karayuki-san: prostitution in Singapore, 1870–1940 (Singapore, 2003)Google Scholar.

7 Van Sant, Pacific pioneers, p. 63.

8 Warren, Ah ku and karayuki-san; Yamazaki, Sandakan hachiban shōkan.

9 Kenkyūkai, Imin, ed., Nihon no imin kenkyū: dōkō to bunken mokuroku (Tokyo, 2008), p. 169 Google Scholar. On the Maria Luz incident, see Botsman, Daniel, ‘Freedom without slavery? “Coolies”, prostitutes, and outcastes in Meiji Japan's “emancipation moment”’, American Historical Review, 116 (2011), pp. 1323–47Google Scholar; Saveliev, Igor, ‘Rescuing the prisoners of the Maria Luz: the Meiji government and the “coolie trade”, 1868–1875’, in Edström, Bert, ed., Turning points in Japanese history (Richmond, 2002), pp. 71–85 Google Scholar.

10 Here, the term migration is used to mean movement from one country to another for the purpose of long-term settlement, whereas overseas travel assumes the person's stay in a foreign country is of a temporary nature. Obviously, the distinction between the two cannot be completely clear-cut, but the typical image of the former is the plantation workers who move with their entire families, while a typical traveller would have no intention of permanently leaving.

11 For a general overview of Japanese migration history, see Imin Kenkyūkai, ed., Nihon no imin kenkyu; Shinzō, Araragi, Nihon teikoku wo meguru jinkō idō no kokusai shakaigaku (Tokyo, 2008)Google Scholar.

12 Caprio, Mark, Japanese assimilation policies in colonial Korea, 1910–1945 (Seattle, WA, 2009)Google Scholar; Uchida, Jun, Brokers of empire: Japanese settler colonialism in Korea, 1876–1945 (Cambridge, MA, 2011)Google Scholar; Driscoll, Mark, Absolute erotic, absolute grotesque: the living, dead and undead in Japan's imperialism, 1895–1945 (Durham, NC, 2010)Google Scholar.

13 Yagishita Hiroko has discussed the changes in the format of Japanese passports from 1866 to 1945, though the discussion remains on the stylistic changes of the document. Kamishiraishi Minoru has attributed the introduction of passports to two incidents where a foreign merchant took his Japanese employee overseas, in violation of the ban. Kamishiraishi refers to these incidents as evidence to argue that Tokugawa's motivation for introducing passports was to strengthen border control. However, it is not clear from his analysis how these two isolated cases of undocumented travel by merchants alone compelled the shogunate to change one of the defining elements of its foreign relations. Hiroko, Yagishita, ‘Senzenki no ryoken no hensen’, Gaikō Shiryōkan Hō, 12 (1998), pp. 31–59 Google Scholar; Minoru, Kamishiraishi, ‘Meiji ishinki ryoken seido no kisoteki kenkyū’, Shien, 73 (2013), pp. 163–88Google Scholar.

14 For the study of the history of passports in the Western world, the defining work has been done by John Torpey, while Craig Robertson studied the case of American passports. Torpey, John, The invention of the passport: surveillance, citizenship and the state (Cambridge, 2000)Google Scholar; Robertson, Craig, Passport in America: the history of a document (Oxford, 2010)Google Scholar. Studies of the history of US border control in the same period include McKeown, Adam, Melancholy order: Asian migration and the globalization of borders (New York, NY, 2008)Google Scholar.

15 Tomio, Igarashi, Kinsei sekisho seido no kenkyū (Tokyo, 1975)Google Scholar.

16 Parkes to Clarendon, 29 May 1866, TNA FO46/68 no87 incl.1, Yokohama.

17 Mizuno Tadakiyo and Matsudaira Yasuhide to Parkes, 27 May 1866. In Parkes to Clarendon, TNA FO46/68 no87, Yokohama.

18 Diplomatic Archives of Japan (DAJP), Zoku tsūshin zenran ruishū no bu senkan mon, pp. 722–3.

19 Parkes to Clarendon, 28 Apr. 1866, TNA FO46/68 no73, Yedo.

20 On the tariff convention, see Masashi, Ugai, Bakumatsu ishin ki no gaikō to bōeki (Tokyo, 2002), pp. 142–8Google Scholar; Auslin, Michael, Negotiating with imperialism (Cambridge, MA, 2004), pp. 129–35Google Scholar.

21 Parkes to Clarendon, 27 June 1866, TNA FO881/1474 no2.

22 Yasukazu, Tanabe, Bakumatsu gaikō dan (2 vols., Tokyo, 1966), ii, p. 249 Google Scholar.

23 Parkes to Clarendon, 16 July 1866, TNA FO881/1474 no4, Nagasaki.

24 Yuzuru, Sugiura, Sugiura Yuzuru zenshū (5 vols., Tokyo, 1978), i, pp. 127–30Google Scholar; Hensanjo, Tokyo Daigaku Shiryō, ed., Ishin shiryō kōyō (ISK) (10 vols., Tokyo, 1937–40), vi, p. 323 Google Scholar.

25 Two of them returned home in 1864, and another one in 1866. The remaining two stayed until 1868. See Cobbing, Japanese discovery of Victorian Britain, pp. 24–7.

26 ISK, v, p. 405. Also see Cobbing, Japanese discovery of Victorian Britain.

27 Ibid., iv, p. 96, vi, pp. 78, 612.

28 On Senzaimaru, see Tōru, Haruna, ‘1862 nen bakufu Senzaimaru no Shanhai haken’, in Takeo, Tanaka, ed., Zenkindai nihon no kokka to taigai kankei (Tokyo, 1987), pp. 555–601 Google Scholar; Fogel, Joshua, Maiden voyage: the Senzaimaru and the creation of modern Sino-Japanese relations (Chicago, IL, 2014)Google Scholar.

29 Hellyer, Robert, Defining engagement: Japan in global contexts, 1640–1868 (Cambridge, MA, 2009), pp. 125–32Google Scholar.

30 ‘Shanhai tansaku fukumeisho’, in Sugiura Yuzuru zenshū, i, pp. 182–94.

31 See appendix for full tables.

32 See Table 1 for Ishizuki's data. For Cobbing's, see Cobbing, Japanese discovery of Victorian Britain, p. 35.

33 Akira, Tezuka, ed., Bakumatsu Meiji kaigai tokōsha sōran (2 vols., Tokyo, 1992), i, p. 7 Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., iii, pp. 71–83. See Table 2.

35 Adopted from Tsūshōkyoku, Gaimushō, ed., Ryoken kafusū oyobi imin tōkei: Meiji gannen – Taishō 9nen (Tokyo, 1921), pp. 2–3 Google Scholar.

36 DAJP 3.8.5.65 ‘Kaikōjō oyobi fuken kaigai ryoken fuyo jinmeihyō.’

37 DAJP 3.8.5.11 ‘Ryoken hōki oyobi dō hōki toriatsukai tetsuzuki ni kansuru kunrei shirei narabini ryoken kafu torishimari zakken.’

38 NMHC 303–1-2.

39 DAJP 3.8.5.65 ‘Kaikōjō oyobi fuken kaigai ryoken fuyo jinmeihyō.’ For the population of Tsushima, see Naimushō, Nihon zenkoku kosekihyō Meiji 8 (1875) nen 1gatsu 1nichi shirabe (Apr. 1877), which reports the island's population as on 1 Jan. 1875 as 30,010.

40 Yatarō, Doi, Yamaguchiken Ōshimagun Hawai iminshi (Tokuyama, 1980), pp. 4–5 Google Scholar; Masaji, Marumoto, ‘“First year” immigrants to Hawaii and Eugene Van Reed’, in Conroy, Hilary and Miyakawa, T. Scott, eds., East across the Pacific: historical and sociological studies of Japanese immigration and assimilation (Oxford, 1972), pp. 5–8 Google Scholar.

41 Fujio, Shimomura, Meiji ishin no gaikō (Tokyo, 1948), pp. 158–61Google Scholar.

42 Higashikuze to van Valkenburgh, 25 May 1868, United States Department of State, Executive documents printed by order of the House of Representatives, during the third session of the fortieth congress, 1868–1869, ii (US Government Printing Office, 1868–9), pp. 747–8.

43 Saveliev, ‘Rescuing the prisoners of the Maria Luz’, p. 73; New York Times, 16 June 1868.

44 Honolulu Gazette, 24 June 1868.

45 Ibid. Cited in Marumoto, ‘“First year” immigrants’, p. 23.

46 Van Valkenburgh to Seward, Yokohama, 29 May 1868, Executive documents, 1868–1869, ii, pp. 746–7.

47 Van Valkenburgh to Higashikuze, 26 May 1868, Executive documents, 1868–1869, ii, p. 748.

48 Bill 644, 40th Congress, 2nd session, 23 July 1868, ‘Century of lawmaking for a nation: U. S. congressional documents and debates, 1774–1875’, Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lawhome.html (accessed 2 Oct. 2014).

49 McCook to Phillips, 29 July 1868, Executive documents, 1868–1869, i, p. 343.

50 Phillips to McCook, 20 Aug. 1868, Executive documents, 1868–1869, i, p. 345.

51 Inclosure 1 in McCook to Seward, 14 Sept. 1868, Executive documents, 1868–1869, i, p. 347.

52 ‘The coolie question’, Ka Nupepa Kuokoa, 12 Sept. 1868.

53 National Diet Library, Tokyo, Ueno Kagenori kankei monjo 38–2–1, 7 Oct. 1869.

54 Shimomura, Meiji ishin no gaikō, p. 157.

55 DAJP B1.1.1.40, dialogue between Terashima and van der Hoeven.

56 DAJP B1.1.1.41 ‘Meiji Gonen Taiwasho’, dialogue between Terashima, Soejima, and van der Hoeven, 1 Apr. 1872.

57 DAJP B1.1.1.40, dialogue between Terashima and van der Hoeven, 7 Oct. 1871. Kamishiraishi Minoru has pointed out that this requirement for a guarantor was introduced in May 1869, along with the instructions to travellers. Kamishiraishi, ‘Kisoteki kenkyū’.

58 DAJP B1.1.1.40, dialogue between Terashima and van der Hoeven, 7 Oct. 1871. This means that the Meiji government was already reluctant to send migrants before the Maria Luz incident hit the government.

59 Kanpōkyoku, Naikaku, ed., Hōrei zensho Meiji ninen (Tokyo, 1887), p. 149 Google Scholar.

60 The government issued a separate set of rules for students going overseas (Kaigai ryūgaku kisoku) on 11 Feb. 1871. Ibid., pp. 700–2. There is no mention of debt or guarantor in these rules, which the government probably saw as unnecessary.

61 NMHC 18–5 document 81, the foreign ministry to Nagasaki prefecture, 11 Nov. 1869.

62 NMHC 14–18–4 document 63, the foreign ministry to Nagasaki prefecture, 31 July 1870.

63 Kamishiraishi, ‘Kisoteki kenkyū’, p. 174; NMHC 14–18–5 document 30, the foreign ministry to Nagasaki prefecture, 4 June 1869.

64 NMHC 303–1–2.

65 NMHC 13–310–4.

66 Harootunian, Harry, ‘The economic rehabilitation of the samurai in the early Meiji period’, Journal of Asian Studies, 19 (1960), p. 439 Google Scholar.

67 NMHC 14–18–4 document 62; NMHC 14–320–4 document 21, the foreign ministry to Nagasaki prefecture, 10 May 1872.

68 On the early history of sea otter hunting in the Kuril Islands and the vicinities, see Snow, Henry James, In forbidden seas: recollections of sea-otter hunting in the Kurils (London, 1910)Google Scholar.

69 Hokkaido University Library Northern Studies Collection, ‘Rakko ryō enkaku’, 14 Nov. 1884, Nemuro ken keisatsu honsho, Chishima no kuni shotō mitsuryo ni kansuru shorui.

70 Gaimusho dai 1 gō futatsu, 20 Feb. 1878, in Kanpokyoku, Naikaku, Hōrei zensho Meiji jūichinen (Tokyo, 1890), p. 193 Google Scholar.

71 Ibid., p. 196.

72 ‘Chōsenkoku e torai no mono kaigai ryoken tesuryo toritatekata’, 22 Mar. 1878, ibid., p. 200.

73 National Archives of Japan, Dajō ruiten 3, vol. 19, notice from the foreign ministry, 22 Mar. 1878, DA00623100.

74 NMHC 14–374–3 document 32, Terashima to Nagasaki prefecture, 17 July 1874.

75 DAJP 3.8.5.4, Shinagawa to Miyagawa, 3 Oct. 1874.

76 DAJP 3.8.5.4, Terashima to Osaka governor, Kanagawa governor, Hyogo governor, 18 Dec. 1874.

77 Torpey, The invention of the passport, pp. 21–92.

78 Translated and quoted in John Bull (London), 631 issue 2440, 14 Sept. 1867.

79 Hansard papers 3rd series vol. 111, p. 400, House of Commons sitting of 27 May 1850.

80 British parliamentary papers 2356, Commons sitting of Friday 2 May 1851.

81 ‘A travellers’ strike’, Punch, 6 Apr. 1872.

82 Thomas Cook to Lord Lyons, London, 15 Aug. 1871, British parliament papers, 1872 [C. 529], France, ‘Correspondence respecting passports in France’.

83 Thomas Cook Archive, Peterborough, UK, Excursionist, 19 July 1871, 15 Aug. 1871, 28 Sept. 1871.

84 British parliamentary papers 1872 [C. 529], Lyons to Granville, 4 pm on 11 Apr. 1872, no. 32, Paris, telegram, in ‘Correspondence respecting passports in France’, p. 17.

85 Ibid., p. 19; ‘Extract from the “Journal Officiel” of 14 April, 1872’, enclosure to Lyons to Granville, 14 Apr. 1872, no. 38, Paris.

86 Granville's speech at the parliament on 8 Mar. 1872, cited in Roth, Cecil, A history of the Jews in England (Oxford, 1964), p. 40 Google Scholar.

87 British parliamentary papers 1857–8 [2356], ‘Correspondence respecting passports in France’.

88 Wright, Owain, ‘Police “outrages” against British residents and travellers in liberal Italy, 1867–1877’, Crime, Histoire & Sociétés, 14 (2010), pp. 51–72 Google Scholar.

89 Baedeker, Karl, Paris, including routes from London to Paris and from Paris to the Rhine and Switzerland (London, 1865), p. xii Google Scholar. Also see Murray, John, A handbook for travellers in France (London, 1870), pp. xiv–xv Google Scholar.

90 Robertson, Passport in America, pp. 125–59.

91 Shin, Kawashima, ‘Taiwanjin wa Nihonjin ka: 19 seiki matsu zai shamu kajin no nihon kōshikan tōroku, kokuseki shutoku mondai’, in Toshihiko, Kishi, ed., Kindai Ajia no Jigazō to Tasha: Chiiki shakai to ‘gaikokujin’ mondai (Kyoto, 2011)Google Scholar.

92 NMHC 14–303–1 document 35.