Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T04:49:43.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The need for goal-setting theory and motivation constructs in Lean management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2019

Gordon B. Schmidt Open the ORCID record for Gordon B. Schmidt [Opens in a new window]
Gordon B. Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Purdue University Fort Wayne
*
*Corresponding author. Email: schmidtg@pfw.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 251 - 254
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balzer, W. K., Brodke, M. H., Kluse, C., & Zickar, M. J. (2019). Revolution or 30-year fad? A role for I-O psychology in Lean management. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(3), 215–233.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bhasin, S. (2012). Prominent obstacles to lean. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61, 403–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, D. S., & Kawada, M. (2012, June). Education approach in Japan for management and engineering of systems. Presented at the 2012 ASEE Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Cochran, D. S., Schmidt, G. B., Oxtoby, J., Hensley, M., & Barnes, J. (2017). Using collective system design to define and communicate organization goals and related solutions. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 7, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, S. M., Barney, C. E., & Bishop, J. W. (2013). The treatment of self-efficacy among psychology and management scholars. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 811–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erez, M., & Zidon, I. (1984). Effect of goal acceptance on the relation of goal difficulty to performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G., Stone, K. B., Mayeshiba, T., Componation, P. J., & Farrington, P. A. (2014). Transitioning from teaching lean tools to teaching lean transformation. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 4, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holweg, M. (2007). The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (2008). The three C’s of work motivation: Content, context, and change. In Kanfer, R., Chen, G., & Pritchard, R. D. (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present and future (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 885–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, G. P., & Sejits, G. H. (2016). Similarities and differences among performance, behavioral, and learning goals. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23, 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, G. P., Seijts, G. H., & Slocum, J. (2016). The goal setting and goal orientation labyrinth: Effective ways for increasing employee performance. Organizational Dynamics, 45, 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liker, J. W., & Morgan, J. M. (2006). The Toyota way in services: The case of lean product development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scherrer-Rathje, M., Boyle, T. A., & Deflorin, P. (2009). Lean take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Business Horizons, 52, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., & Woodwark, M. (2013). Learning goals: A qualitative and quantitative review. In Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 195–212). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group & Organization Management, 21, 236–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar