Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T14:35:21.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Norwegian og and å – a Cognitive View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Rolf Theil Endresen
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1102 Blindern, N-0317 Oslo, Norway. Email: r.t.endresen@ilf.uio.no
Get access

Abstract

Written Norwegian has two words, the co-ordinating conjunction og and the infinitive marker å, both of which are pronounced [o] in Spoken Norwegian. In this paper, an attempt is made to show that [o] in Spoken Norwegian constitutes a single polysemous word. Furthermore, it is argued that Spoken Norwegian [o], in all its usages and meanings, is a descendant of Old Norse ok “and”, while the Old Norse infinitive marker at has not survived in Spoken Norwegian.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aasen, I. 1965 [1864]. Norsk Grammatik. Omarb. Udg. af «Det norske Folkesprogs Grammatik» Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. [Reprint of the 1864 ed.]Google Scholar
Arnott, D. W. 1970. The Nominal and Verbal Systems of Fula. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beito, O. T. 1970. Nynorsk grammatikk. Lyd- og ordlœre. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget.Google Scholar
Brøndum-Nielsen, J. 1951. Dialekter og Dialektforskning. København: J. H. Schultz Forlag.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology: a Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, K. K. 1983. The Categorical Status of Norwegian Infinitival Relatives. In: Karlsson (1983).Google Scholar
Croft, W. 1990. Typology and Universals (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dal, I. 1966. Kurze deutsche Syntax auf historiseher Grundlage. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, P. 1970. Elementœr Dansk Grammatik. 3. udg. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T. 1975. Monoftongering i nordisk. Maal og Minne 1975: 169189.Google Scholar
Falk, H. & Torp, A. 1900. Dansk-norskens syntax i historisk fremstilling. Kristiania: H. Aschehoug & Co. (W. Nygaard).Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1989. From Purposive to Infinitive – a Universal Path of Grammaticization. Folia Linguistica X/1–2:287310.Google Scholar
Heine, B., Claudi, U. & Hünnemeyer, F. 1991. Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. & Christensen, K. K. (ed.) 1986. Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellquist, E. 1957. Svensk etymologisk ordbok. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerups förlag.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Traugott, E. C. 1993. Grammaticalization. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1921. Sammenfaldet: og = at. Tanker og studier, 175211.Google Scholar
Konungs skuggsiá. Utg. for Kjeldeskriftfondet ved L., Holm-Olsen. (Norrøne tekster nr. 1.) Oslo 1983: Norsk historisk kjeldeskrift-institutt.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langaker, R. W. 1991a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II. Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1991b. Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nielsen, N. Å. 1976. Dansk etymologisk ordbog. Ordenes historic 3. rev. udg. med et tillæg. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Nordgård, T., & Åfarli, T. A. 1990. Generativ syntaks. Ei innføring via norsk. Oslo:Novus forlag.Google Scholar
Noye, D. 1974. Cours de foulfouldé (dialecte peul du Diamaré, Nord-Cameroun). Maroua: Mission Catholique. Paris: P. Geuthner.Google Scholar
Nudansk ordbog. 1972, I, II. 7. rev. og forøgede udg. ved E., Oxenvad. København: Politikens Forlag.Google Scholar
Pamp, B. 1978. Svenska dialekter. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. 1986. COMP, INFL, and Germanic word order. Hellan & Christensen (1986:185234).Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammarof the English Language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Seip, D. A. 1955. Norsk språkhistorie til omkring 1370. 2. utg. Oslo: H. Aschehoug & Co. (W. Nygaard).Google Scholar
Streitberg, W. 1910. Gotisches Elementarbuch. 3. u. 4. verb. Aufl. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K. T. 1984. Some Phrase Structure Dependent Differences Between Swedish and Norwegian. In: Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 9, Universitetet i Trondheim.Google Scholar
Vannebo, K. I. 1969. Aksjonsart i norsk. Ein syntaktisk funksjonsanalyse. Oslo, Bergen, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Vestbøstad, P. (red.) 1989. Nynorsk frekvensordbok. 1989. Bergen: Alma Mater Forlag AS.Google Scholar
Vinje, F.-E. 1987. Moderne norsk. Råd og regler for praktisk språkbruk. Oslo, Bergen, Stavanger, Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Wessén, E. 1969. Svensk språkhistoria. I. Ljudlära och ordböjningslära. 8. uppl. (1968). 2. oförändr. tryckn. (1969). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kristiania: H. Aschehoug & Co. (W. Nygaard). [Faksimileutg. 1975.]Google Scholar
Western, A. 1921. Norsk riksmåls-grammatikk for studerende og łœrere.Google Scholar