Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T07:19:09.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ROUTING OF AIRPLANES TO TWO RUNWAYS: MONOTONICITY OF OPTIMAL CONTROLS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

N. Bäuerle ,
O. Engelhardt-Funke  and
M. Kolonko
N. Bäuerle
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematische Stochastik, Universität Hannover, Germany, E-mail: baeuerle@stochastik.uni-hannover.de
O. Engelhardt-Funke
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematik, Technical University Clausthal, D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, E-mail: kolonko@math.tu-clausthal.de
M. Kolonko
Affiliation:
Institut für Mathematik, Technical University Clausthal, D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, E-mail: kolonko@math.tu-clausthal.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider the problem of routing incoming airplanes to two runways of an airport. Due to air turbulence, the necessary separation time between two successive landing operations depends on the type of airplane. When viewed as a queuing problem, this means that we have dependent service times. The aim is to minimize the waiting times of aircrafts. We consider here a model in which arrivals form a stochastic process and the decision-maker does not know anything about future arrivals. We formulate this as a problem of stochastic dynamic programming and investigate the monotonicity of optimal routing strategies with respect to the workload of the runways, for example. We show that an optimal strategy is monotone (i.e., of switching type) only in a restricted case where decisions depend on the state of the runways only and not on the type of the arriving aircraft. Surprisingly, in the more realistic case where this type is also known to the decision-maker, monotonicity need not hold.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 2004 , pp. 533 - 560
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Altman, E. & Stidham, S., Jr. (1995). Optimality of monotonic policies for two-action Markovian decision processes, with applications to control of queues with delayed information. Queueing Systems 21: 267–291.Google Scholar
Bäuerle, N., Engelhardt-Funke, O., & Kolonko, M. (2002). Routing of airplanes to two runways: Stability and bounds for the waiting times, submitted.
Beasley, J.E., Krishnamoorty, M., Sharaiha, Y.M., & Abramson, D. (2000). Scheduling aircraft landings—The static case. Transportation Science 34: 180–197.Google Scholar
Bertsekas, D. (1987). Dynamic programming: Deterministic and stochastic models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bertsekas, D. & Tsitsiklis, J.N. (1996). Neuro-dynamic programming. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bolender, M.A. & Slater, G.L. (2000). Evaluation of scheduling methods for multiple runways. Journal of Aircrafts 37: 410–416.Google Scholar
Hordijk, A., Koole, G.M., & Loeve, J.A. (1994). Analysis of a customer assignment model with no state information. Probability in the Engineering and Information Sciences 8: 419–429.Google Scholar
Horonjeff, R. & McKelvey, F.X. (1994). Planning and design of airports, 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Neuts, M.F. (1977). Some explicit formulas for the steady-state behaviour of the queue with semi-Markovian service times. Advances in Applied Probability 9: 141–157.Google Scholar
Puterman, M.L. (1994). Markov decision processes. Discrete stochastic dynamic programming. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley.
Schäl, M. (1975). Conditions for the optimality in dynamic programming and for the limit of n-stage optimal policies to be optimal. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und verwandte Gebiete 32: 179–196.Google Scholar
Stidham, S., Jr. & Weber, R. (1993). A survey of Markov decision models for control of networks of queues. Queueing Systems 13: 291–314.Google Scholar