Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T23:12:22.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The organization of industrial interests in Italy, 1906–1925

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Jonathan Morris*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. E-mail ucrajmm@ucl.ac.uk

Extract

Franklin Hugh Adler, Italian Industrialists from Liberalism to Fascism. The Political Development of the Industrial Bourgeoisie, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996, xv + 458 pp., ISBN 0–521–433406–8 hbk, £40.00

Giuseppe Berta, Il governo degli interessi. Industriali, rappresentanza e politica nell'Italia del nord-ovest 1906–1924, Marsilio, Venice, 1996, xv + 175 pp., ISBN 88–317–6342–3 pbk, 32,000 Lire

Giorgio FioccaStoria della Confindustria 1900–1914, Marsilio, Venice, 1994, 266 pp., ISBN 88–317–5850–0 hbk, 70,000 Lire

The three books under review trace the organization of industrial interests in Italy from the foundation of the Lega industrial di Torino (LIT) in 1906 to the insertion of Confindustria into the Fascist totalitarian state. As Franklin Hugh Adler's ambitious and detailed account relates the Lega (LIT) begat first a Federazione Industriali Piemontesi (1908) and then the Confederazione Italiana dell'Industria (CIDI) in 1910 which was relaunched as the Confederazione generale dell'industria Italiana (Confindustria) in 1919. All of these organizations came under the effective direction of Gino Olivetti, the first secretary of the Lega who emerges from Adler's analysis as the principal theorist of a liberalproductionist ideology that the author regards as the central value system of the Italian industrial bourgeoisie. The slimmer volumes (in both scope and size) of Giuseppe Berta and Giorgio Fiocca diverge from Adler's account in stressing the discontinuities in the process of association which are attributed to the triumph of one industrial faction over another, and the changes in direction consequent upon this. By presenting these organizations within the broader context of entrepreneurial and associational activity, their accounts also call into question the extent to which the positions of Confindustria can be assumed to be representative of Italian industrialists as a whole.

Type
Review Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. According to Fiocca, the paperwork for deportation had already been drawn up. Fiocca, , Storia della Confindustria, p. 201.Google Scholar

2. On Candiani and the Partito Economico, see Fiocca, Giorgio, ‘Il terzo partito: un aspetto della “milanesità” in età giolittiana’, Passato e Presente, 36, September 1995, pp. 3354.Google Scholar

3. On the FICI and other business associations before 1919, see Moneta, Marco, ‘Forme e tendenze dell'associazionismo industrial italiano dalle origini alla costituzione della Confederazione generate dell'industria’, Annali di storia dell'impresa, 8, 1992, pp. 261341.Google Scholar

4. Adler, , Italian Industrialists, p. 247.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., p. 277.Google Scholar

7. ‘Polemiche’, L'Esercente italiano, Rome, 17 July 1924; ‘Concorrenza … Sleale. Che cos'è l'API di Torino’, Il Piccolo Esercente, Rome, 5 October 1922. For the context of small business politics in this period, see Morris, Jonathan, ‘Retailers, Fascism and the Origins of the Social Protection of Shopkeepers in Italy’, Contemporary European History, 5, 3 (1996), pp. 285–318.Google Scholar

8. Adler, , Italian Industrialists, p. 305.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., p. xii.Google Scholar