Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T22:04:54.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Thermal Annealing Affect the Mechanical Properties of Silkworm (Bombyx mori) Cocoon Silk?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2012

Emily J. Reed
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of California at Merced, 5200 North Lake Road Merced, CA 95343, U.S.A.
Christopher Viney
Affiliation:
School of Engineering, University of California at Merced, 5200 North Lake Road Merced, CA 95343, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

It has been reported [1] that microwave radiation can enhance many of the mechanical properties of Bombyx mori silkworm cocoon silk, as measured in constant strain rate tensile tests to failure and in stress relaxation tests. The consequences of microwave radiation will affect decisions about the use of silk in settings subjected to significant microwave exposure – for example, as a reinforcing fiber in an epoxy matrix composite that may be microwave cured, or as a component in aircraft radomes.

There are two possible mechanisms by which microwave radiation may affect a material [2]: (i) the radiation may enable chemical and/or microstructural changes – and therefore property changes – in the same way that conventional heating would, or (ii) the high heating rates that are achievable by microwaving may selectively favor changes that would be masked under conventional conditions, where heating rates are low enough to give preference to changes that have a lower activation energy. Here we explore the former possibility for silk.

We characterized several mechanical properties of degummed and subsequently annealed B. mori silk, and compared them to the corresponding properties of degummed B. mori silk that was not annealed. The annealing treatment was carried out at 140 °C for 7 hours (conditions that optimally increased crystal size in an unrelated study of B. mori silk [3]), and then the fibers were allowed to cool gradually to room temperature over the course of an hour. Comparison of mechanical properties revealed no differences between the materials that we tested. Thus, for annealed silk, we do not observe the enhancements that can be achieved by microwaving. We conclude that in cases where microwaving affects the properties of silk, those changes are not a simple consequence of annealing by the microwaves.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Morrison, N.A., Bell, F.I., Beautrait, A., Ritchie, J., Smith, C., McEwen, I.J. and Viney, C., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 823, W8.4.1W8.4.6 (2004).10.1557/PROC-823-W8.4Google Scholar
2. Stuerga, D., in Microwaves in Organic Synthesis, Second edition, Loupy, A., Ed., (WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2006) chapter 1.Google Scholar
3. Somashekar, R. and Urs, R.G., Bull. Mater. Sci. 14(1), 8791 (1991).10.1007/BF02745093Google Scholar
4. Reed, E.J. and Viney, C., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 1301, 161172 (2011).10.1557/opl.2011.571Google Scholar
5. Zhao, H.-P., Feng, X.-Q. and Shi, H.-J., Materials Science and Engineering C, 27, 675683 (2007).10.1016/j.msec.2006.06.031Google Scholar
6. Pérez-Rigueiro, J., Biancotto, L., Corsini, P., Marsano, E., Elices, M., Plaza, G.R. and Guinea, G.V., International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 44, 195202 (2009).10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.12.001Google Scholar
7. Pérez-Rigueiro, J., Viney, C., Llorca, J. and Elices, M., Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 70, 24392447 (1998).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2439::AID-APP16>3.0.CO;2-J3.0.CO;2-J>Google Scholar
8. Carmichael, S. and Viney, C., Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 72, 895903 (1999).10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990516)72:7<895::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-43.0.CO;2-4>Google Scholar
9. Reed, E.J., Bianchini, L.L. and Viney, C., Biopolymers, 97(6), 397407 (2012).10.1002/bip.22005Google Scholar
10. Hu, X., Shmelev, K., Sun, L., Gil, E.-S., Park, S.-H., Cebe, P. and Kaplan, D.L., Biomacromolecules, 12, 16861696 (2011).10.1021/bm200062aGoogle Scholar