Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:41:05.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Nitrogen Application Timing on Low Density Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) Interference in Corn

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

W. G. Johnson ,
E. J. Ott ,
K. D. Gibson ,
R. L. Nielsen  and
T. T. Bauman
W. G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
E. J. Ott
Affiliation:
Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
K. D. Gibson
Affiliation:
Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
R. L. Nielsen
Affiliation:
Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
T. T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Purdue University, 915 W. State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of three nitrogen fertilizer application timings on corn and giant ragweed dry weight, corn and giant ragweed nitrogen accumulation, and corn grain yield. By the V8 growth stage, corn plants in treatments which included nitrogen at planting accumulated up to 27% more dry weight and 26% more leaf area than corn in sidedress-only treatments that had not yet received any fertilizer nitrogen. Nitrogen fertilizer application timing did not influence early-season giant ragweed dry weight, but did influence N accumulation. Giant ragweed at 0.5 plants/m2 accumulated up to 16 kg N/ha in 40-cm-tall plants by the V8 corn growth stage and up to 104 kg N/ha when allowed to remain in corn until the end of the growing season. At this density of giant ragweed, corn yields were not reduced if removed by the V8 corn growth stage. However, season-long interference reduced corn yields by up to 19% regardless of nitrogen application timing. Early-season giant ragweed growth was less responsive to nitrogen application timing than corn, suggesting that nitrogen management programs should not be altered significantly to influence giant ragweed competitiveness in corn. However, giant ragweed should be removed in a timely manner to minimize nitrogen accumulation in nitrogen-limiting corn production situations.

Keywords

Giant ragweed, Ambrosia trifida L. AMBTRcorn, Zea mays L. ‘DKC60-09RR2/YGCB’ and ‘DKC61-45RR/YGCB’Corn yieldnitrogen accumulationweed competition
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 763 - 767
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Abul-Fatih, H. A. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1979. The biology of Ambrosia trifida L. III. Growth and biomass allocation. New Phytol. 83:829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comley, H. H. 1945. Cyanosis in infants caused by nitrate in well water. J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 129:112–116.Google Scholar
Cordes, J. C., Johnson, W. G., Smeda, R. J., and Scharf, P. C. 2004. Late-emerging common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer) interference in conventional-tillage corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 18:999–1005.Google Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Shapiro, C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2003a. Nitrogen level affects critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51:408–417.Google Scholar
Evans, S. P., Knezevic, S. Z., Shapiro, C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2003b. Influence of nitrogen level and duration of weed interference on corn growth and development. Weed Sci. 51:546–556.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hillger, D. E. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:1065–1070.Google Scholar
Hallberg, G. R. 1989. Pesticides pollution of groundwater in the humid United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 26:299–367.Google Scholar
Hans, S. R. and Johnson, W. G. 2002. Influence of shattercane [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] interference in corn (Zea mays L.) yield and nitrogen accumulation. Weed Technol. 16:787–791.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. K., Regnier, E. E., Schmoll, J. T., and Webb, J. E. 2001. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 49:224–229.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2006. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: May 16, 2006.Google Scholar
Hellwig, K. B., Johnson, W. G., and Scharf, P. C. 2002. Grass weed interference and nitrogen accumulation in no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 50:757–762.Google Scholar
Killorn, R. J., Voss, R. D., and Hornstein, J. S. 1995. Nitrogen fertilizer management studies, 1987–1991. P. 2.3-1.15. Integrated Farm Management Demonstration Program Comprehensive Report. IFM 16. Ames, IA Iowa State University in.Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 7:153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nice, G. R. W. and Johnson, W. G. 2005. Indiana's top ten most problematic weeds. http://www.btny.purdue.edu/weedscience/2005/topten05.pdf. Accessed: January 20, 2006.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., and Benson, G. O. 1992. How a Corn Plant Develops (SP-48). Iowa State University. http://maize.agron.iastate.edu/corntitle.html. Accessed: May 16, 2006.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Wax, L. M., Harrison, R. G., and Harrison, K. 2004. Variations in emergence patterns of giant ragweed biotypes from Ohio, Illinois, and Iowa. Abstr., Weed Soc. Sci. Am. 44:60.Google Scholar
Turner, R. E. and Rabalais, N. N. 2003. Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River basin for 200 years. Bioscience 53:563–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US EPA. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2005. Pesticide Registration-Atrazine. http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/reregistration/atrazine/. Accessed: May 16, 2006.Google Scholar
USDA-NASS. U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service 2005. Crops Section of the Annual Statistical Bulletin-Indiana Agricultural Statistics 2005–2006. Web page: http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Indiana/Publications/Annual_Statistical_Bulletin/0506/06crops.asp. Accessed: September 1, 2006.Google Scholar
USDA-NASS. U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Agricultural Statistics Service 2006. Agricultural Chemical Database: Usage Search. http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm. Accessed: September 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Vitosh, M. L., Johnson, J. W., and Menge, D. B. 2002. Tri-State Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn, Soybean, Wheat, and Alfalfa. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Publication. AY-92. http://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/forages/publications/ay9-92.htm. Accessed: September 1, 2006.Google Scholar