Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T12:02:41.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Delaying Weed Control Lengthens the Anthesis-Silking Interval in Maize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andrew Reid
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, N1G 2W, Canada
Victor Gonzalez
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, N1G 2W, Canada
Peter H. Sikkema
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, Ridgetown Campus, Ridgetown, Ontario N0P 2C0
Elizabeth A. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, N1G 2W, Canada
Lewis Lukens
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, N1G 2W, Canada
Clarence J. Swanton*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E., Guelph, ON, N1G 2W, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: cswanton@uoguelph.ca

Abstract

Stress caused by early weed competition is known to delay the rate of maize development which may result in a decrease in kernel number. Kernel number in maize is correlated negatively with the length of the anthesis-silking interval (ASI). A short ASI has been identified as an easily measured, visual trait which may identify enhanced drought tolerance in maize. Field studies were conducted to test whether: (1) delaying weed control would result in a lengthening of ASI in both a drought tolerant and non-drought tolerant maize hybrid and (2) the presence of drought tolerance genetics comes at a physiological cost, resulting in a greater yield reduction under weedy conditions. In this study, the response of a drought tolerant hybrid with its non-drought tolerant near-isoline was compared to seven different timings of weed control using wheat as a surrogate competitor. Results confirmed that there was no treatment by hybrid interaction at any site–yr for any of the parameters evaluated. Delaying weed control reduced plant height, leaf tip number, shifted and reduced biomass accumulation, kernel number and grain yield and lengthened ASI for both hybrids. Although yield losses occurred with the delay in weed control timing, no yield differences were observed between hybrids suggesting that there was no additional physiological cost associated with the drought tolerant traits. The drought tolerant hybrid, however, was found to have a shorter ASI, lower kernel number and higher kernel wt compared to the non-drought tolerant hybrid. This study confirmed that delaying weed control can influence the length of ASI, which is an important drought tolerant trait. The lengthening of ASI by early weed competition resulted in a rate of yield loss of 0.13 T ha−1 growing degree days (GDD)−1 when averaged across both hybrids and all treatments.

Type
Weed Management
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Afifi, M, Swanton, CJ (2011) Maize seed and stem roots differ in response to neighbouring weeds. Weed Res. 51:442450 Google Scholar
Afifi, M, Swanton, CJ (2012) Early physiological mechanisms of weed competition. Weed Sci. 60:542551 Google Scholar
Araus, JL, Serret, MD, Edmeades, GO (2012) Phenotyping maize for adaptation to drought. Front Physiol. 3: (Article 305), 120 Google Scholar
Bassetti, P, Westgate, ME (1993) Emergence, elongation, and senescence of maize silks. Crop Sci. 33:271275 Google Scholar
Bassetti, P, Westgate, ME (1994) Floral asynchrony and kernel set in maize quantified by image analysis. Agron J. 86:699703 Google Scholar
Bolaños, J, Edmeades, GO (1993) Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior. Field Crops Res. 31:253268 Google Scholar
Bolaños, J, Edmeades, GO (1996) The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Field Crops Res. 48:6580 Google Scholar
Borrás, L, Otegui, ME (2001) Maize kernel wt response to post flowering source–sink ratio. Crop Sci. 49:18161822 Google Scholar
Borrás, L, Slafer, GA, Otegui, ME (2004) Seed dry wt response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Res. 86:131146 Google Scholar
Bosnić, A, Swanton, CJ (1997) Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45:276282 Google Scholar
Bruce, WB, Edmeades, GO, Barker, TC (2002) Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J Exp Biol. 53:366 1325 Google Scholar
Buren, LL, Mock, JJ, Anderson, IC (1974) Morphological and physiological traits in maize associated with tolerance to high plant density. Crop Sci. 14:426429 Google Scholar
Campbell, GS, Norman, JM (1998) An introduction to environmental biophysics. New York Springer-Verlag. Pp 2834 Google Scholar
Campos, H, Cooper, M, Habben, JE, Edmeades, GO, Schussler, JR (2004) Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res. 90:1934 Google Scholar
Carcova, J, Andrieu, B, Otegui, ME (2003) Silk Elongation in Maize: Relationship with Flower Development and Pollination. Crop Sci. 43:914920 Google Scholar
Cerrudo, D, Page, ER, Tollenaar, M, Stewart, G, Swanton, CJ (2012) Mechanisms of yield loss in maize caused by weed competition. Weed Sci. 60:225232 Google Scholar
Cox, WJ, Hahn, RR, Stachowski, PJ (2006) Time of weed removal with glyphosate affects corn growth and yield components. Agron J. 98:349353 Google Scholar
Daynard, TB, Tanner, JW, Duncan, WG (1971) Duration of the grain filling period and its relation to grain yield in corn (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci. 11:4548 Google Scholar
Dow, EW, Daynard, TB, Muldoon, JF, Major, DJ, Thurtell, GW (1984) Resistance to drought and density stress in Canadian and European maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Can J Plant Sci. 64:575585 Google Scholar
Duvick, DN (1996) Review of the symposium on developing drought and low N tolerant maize. Pages 554556 in Developing Drought- and Low N-Tolerant Maize, Proceedings of a Symposium. El Batán, Mexico CIMMYT Google Scholar
Edmeades, GO (1976) Aspects of plant-to-plant variability in maize (Zea mays L.). Ph.D Dissertation. Ontario, Canada University of Guelph. 174 pGoogle Scholar
Edmeades, GO, Bolaños, J, Chapman, SC, Lafitte, HR, Bänziger, M (1999) Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations: I. Gains in biomass, grain yield, and harvest index. Crop Sci. 39:13061315 Google Scholar
Edmeades, GO, Bolaños, J, Hernandez, M, Bello, S (1993) Causes for silk delay in a lowland tropical maize. Crop Sci. 33:10291035 Google Scholar
Edmeades, GO, Daynard, TB (1979) The development of plant to plant variability in maize at different planting densities. Can J Plant Sci. 59:561576 Google Scholar
Evans, SP, Knezevic, SZ, Lindquist, JL, Shapiro, CA, Blankenship, EE (2003) Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci. 51:408417 Google Scholar
Fickett, ND, Boerboom, CM, Stoltenberg, DE (2013) Predicted corn yield loss due to weed competition prior to postemergence herbicide application on Wisconsin farms. Weed Tech. 27:5462 Google Scholar
Fuad-Hassan, A, Tardieu, F, Turc, O (2008) Drought-induced changes in anthesis-silking interval are related to silk expansion: a spatio-temporal growth analysis in maize plants subjected to soil water deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 31:13491360 Google Scholar
Glenn, FB, Daynard, TB (1974) Effects of genotype, planting pattern, and plant density onplant-to-plant variability and grain yield corn. Can J Plant Sci. 54:323330 Google Scholar
Hall, MR, Swanton, CJ, Anderson, GW (1992) The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441447 Google Scholar
Jacobs, BC, Pearson, CJ (1991) Potential yield of maize, determined by rates of growth and development of ears. Field Crops Res. 27:281298 Google Scholar
Kiniry, JR, Wood, CA, Spanel, DA, Bockholt, AJ (1990) Seed wt response to decreased seed number in maize. Agron J. 54:98102 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SF, Weise, SF, Swanton, CJ (1994) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:568573 Google Scholar
Kropff, MJ, Spitters, CJT (1991) A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Res. 31:97105 Google Scholar
Lafitte, HR, Edmeades, GO (1994) Improvement for tolerance to low soil nitrogen in tropical maize I. Selection criteria. Field Crops Res. 39:114 Google Scholar
Lejeune, P, Bernier, G (1996) Effect of environment on the early steps of ear initiation in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Environ. 19:217224 Google Scholar
Lemcoff, JH, Loomis, RS (1986) Nitrogen influences on yield determination in maize. Crop Sci. 26:10171022 Google Scholar
Liu, JG, Mahoney, KJ, Sikkema, PH, Swanton, CJ (2009) The importance of light quality in crop–weed competition. Weed Res. 49:217224 Google Scholar
McCully, ME (1999) Roots in soil: unearthing the complexities of roots and their rhizospheres. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 50:695718 Google Scholar
Monneveux, P, Zaidi, PH, Sanchez, C (2005) Population density and low nitrogen affects yield-associated traits in tropical maize. Crop Sci. 45:535545 Google Scholar
Moriles, J, Hansen, S, Horvath, DP, Reicks, G, Clay, DE, Clay, SA (2012) Microarray and Growth Analyses Identify Differences and Similarities of Early Corn Response to Weeds, Shade, and Nitrogen Stress. Weed Sci. 60:158166 Google Scholar
Padilla, JM, Otegui, ME (2005) Co-ordination between leaf initiation and leaf appearance in field-grown maize (Zea mays): genotypic differences in response of rates to temperature. Ann Bot. 96:9971007 Google Scholar
Page, ER, Cerrudo, D, Westra, P, Loux, M, Smith, K, Foresman, C, Wright, H, Swanton, CJ (2012) Why early season weed control is important in maize. Weed Sci. 60:423430 Google Scholar
Page, ER, Tollenaar, M, Lee, EA, Lukens, L, Swanton, CJ (2009) Does the shade avoidance response contribute to the critical period for weed control in maize (Zea mays)? Weed Res. 49:563571 Google Scholar
Parry, MAJ, Flexas, J, Medrano, H (2005) Prospects for crop production under drought: research priorities and future directions. Ann Appl Biol. 147:211226 Google Scholar
Passioura, JB (1996) Drought and drought tolerance. Plant Growth Regul. 20:7983 Google Scholar
Ribaut, J, Betran, J, Monneveux, P, Setter, T (2009) Drought tolerance in maize. Pages 311344 in Bennetzen, JL and Hake, SC, eds. Handbook of Maize: Its Biology. New York Springer Google Scholar
Reid, A (2013) Timing of weed control influences the anthesis-silking interval in maize. . University of Guelph. 57 pGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, SW, Hanway, JJ, Benson, GO (1992) How a corn plant grows. Iowa State Univ Sci Tech Coop Ext Serv Rep. 48 Google Scholar
Swanton, CJ, Mahoney, KJ, Chandler, K, Gulden, RH (2008) Integrated weed management: knowledge-based weed management systems. Weed Sci. 56:168172 Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M (1977) Sink–source relationships during reproductive development in maize. A review. Maydica. 22:4975 Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M, Aguilera, A, Nissanka, SP (1997) Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid. Agron J. 89:239246 Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M, Daynard, TB, Hunter, RB (1979) Effect of temperature on rate of leaf appearance and flowering date in maize. Crop Sci. 19:363366 Google Scholar
Tollenaar, M, Lee, EA (2006) Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica. 51:399408 Google Scholar
Vega, CRC, Andrade, FH, Sadras, VO (2001) Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize. Field Crops Res. 72:163175 Google Scholar
Weiner, J (1990) Asymmetric competition in plant populations. Trends Ecol Evol. 5:360364 Google Scholar