Innovation Concept: Global health fieldwork is valuable for Canadian residents, but is often trainee-organized, short-term, unsupervised, and lacking in preparation and debriefing. In contrast, we have developed a Certificate Program which will be offered to University of Toronto (UofT) emergency medicine (EM) trainees in their final year of residency. This 6-month Program will complement the Transition to Practice stage for residents interested in becoming leaders in GHEM. Methods: We completed a multi-phase needs assessment to inform the structure and content of a GHEM Certificate Program. Phase 1 consisted of 9 interviews with Program Directors (PDs), Assistant PDs, and past fellows from existing GH fellowships in Canada and USA to understand program structure, curriculum, fieldwork and funding. In Phase 2 we interviewed 4 PDs and fellows from UofT fellowship programs to understand local administrative structures. In Phase 3 we collected feedback from 5 UofT residents and 7 faculty with experience in global health to assess interest in a local GHEM Program. All interview data was reviewed and best practices and lessons learned from key stakeholders were summarized into a proposed outline for a 6-month GHEM Certificate Program. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: The Program will comprise of 1) 3 months of preparatory work in Toronto followed by 2) 3 months of fieldwork in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Fieldwork will coincide with activities under the Toronto-Addis Ababa Academic Collaboration in Emergency Medicine (TAAAC-EM). The GHEM trainee's work will support TAAAC-EM activities. Preparatory months will include training in specific competencies (POCUS, teaching, tropical medicine, QI) and meetings between the trainee and a UofT mentor to design an academic project. During fieldwork, the trainee will do EM teaching (75% of time) and complete their academic project (25% of time). A UofT supervisor will accompany, orient and supervise the trainee for their first 2 weeks in Addis. Throughout fieldwork, the trainee will be required to debrief with their UofT mentor weekly for academic and clinical mentoring. One AAU faculty member will be identified as a local supervisor and will participate in all evaluations of the trainee during fieldwork. Conclusion: This Program will launch with a call for applications in July 2021, expecting the first trainee to complete the Program in 2022-23. We anticipate that this Program will increase the number of Canadian EM trainees committed to global health projects and partnerships throughout their career.

Introduction: Patients who present to the Emergency Department (ED) with a drug overdose often require long periods of monitoring. After their initial assessment and stabilization, they spend a significant amount of time in a high cost acute care bed in the ED for monitoring until they are medically cleared for psychiatric care or to be discharged. The shift length at this ED is a maximum of 8 hours; meaning any patients staying over 8 hours must be handed over between physicians, increasing the chance of medical errors. The objective of this study is to examine the total ED length of stay (LOS) of this patient group after physician initial assessment (PIA) to determine if there is there justification for the creation of a toxicology observation or short-stay unit for these patients. Methods: A single-centre, blinded retrospective chart review was conducted examining all adult patients presenting to the ED at an urban academic tertiary care centre with a drug overdose in 2018. Variables examined include: Disposition (home, admitted to acute care setting, admitted to non-acute care setting), time from PIA to disposition and total length of stay from PIA to discharge home or admission to hospital. The primary outcome is total length of stay in the ED after PIA.M Results: A total of 1006 patients presenting with an overdose were included. A total of 388 patients were admitted with 44% (172) having an ED LOS greater than 8 hours and 36% (138) staying 8 hours after PIA. The median [IQR] LOS in the ED for all patients was 343 minutes [191-565] while the median [IQR] time to PIA was 37 minutes [15-97]. The majority of these patients (54%) were discharged with no consulting services involved, 23% received a consult to psychiatry, 22% were consulted to internal medicine and 5% of patients were consulted to Critical Care Medicine. Conclusion: This demonstrates patients presenting to the ED with an overdose are seen in the ED by a physician quickly, however many stay in the department over 5 hours from their initial assessment in a monitored setting. While a majority of these patients are able to go home, 44% of admitted patients wait greater than 8 hours in the ED on monitors. The creation of a toxicology observation unit would be helpful for this population to increase patient safety and ease ED bed congestion.

Introduction: Detection of a pulse is crucial to decision-making in the care of patients who are in cardiac arrest, however, the current standard of manual pulse palpation is unreliable. An emerging alternative is the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for direct assessment of the carotid pulse. The primary objective of this study is to determine the inter-observer reliability for healthcare provider interpretation of the carotid pulse by POCUS in patients who are peri-arrest or in cardiac arrest. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey of healthcare providers. Participants were shown a tutorial demonstrating POCUS detection of the carotid pulse and then asked to interpret 15 carotid pulse ultrasound clips from patients who were peri-arrest or in cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was inter-observer reliability for carotid pulse assessment. Secondary outcomes included inter-observer reliability stratified by healthcare provider role and POCUS experience, mean tutorial duration, mean pulse assessment duration, rate of pulse assessments < 10 seconds, and change in participant confidence before and after the study. Inter-observer reliability was determined by Krippendorff's α. Change in participant confidence was determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: 68 participants completed our study, with a response rate of 75% (68/91). There was near perfect inter-observer reliability for pulse assessment amongst all study participants (α=0.874, 95% CI 0.869, 0.879). Senior residents (n = 24) and POCUS experts (n = 6) demonstrated the highest rates of inter-observer reliability, α=0.902 (95% CI 0.888, 0.914) and α=0.925 (95% CI 0.869, 0.972), respectively. All sub-groups had α greater than 0.8. Mean tutorial duration was 31 seconds (SD = 17.5) with maximum duration of 55 seconds. Mean pulse assessment duration was 7.7 seconds (SD = 5.2) with 76% of assessments completed within 10 seconds. Participant confidence before and after the study significantly increased from a median of 2 to a median of 4 on a 5-point Likert-type scale (z = 6.3, p < .001). Conclusion: Interpretation of the carotid pulse by POCUS showed near perfect inter-observer reliability for patients who were peri-arrest or in cardiac arrest. Participants required minimal training and indicated improved POCUS pulse assessment confidence after the study. Further work must be done to determine the impact of POCUS pulse assessment on the resuscitation of patients in cardiac arrest.

Background: The Brant Community Healthcare System (BCHS) has consistently been well above the recommended 30 minute benchmark for door-to-needle (DTN) for eligible acute stroke patients. As a large community hospital with no neurologists, and like many other hospitals internationally, we rely on telestroke support for every stroke case. This is a time-consuming process that requires a multitude of phone calls, and pulls physicians from other acutely ill patients. We sought to develop a system that would streamline our approach and care for hyperacute stroke patients by targeting improvements in DTN. Aim Statement: We will decrease the door-to-needle (DTN) time for stroke patients arriving at the BCHS Emergency Department (ED) who are eligible for tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) by 25% from a median of 87 minutes to 50 minutes by March 31, 2018 and maintain that standard. Measures & Design: Outcome Measures: Door-to-needle time for acute stroke patients receiving tPA Process Measures: Door-to-triage time, Door-to-CT time, Door-to-CTA time; INR collection-to-verification time, telestroke callback time Balancing Measures: Number of stroke protocol patients per month Model Design: We simultaneously designed and implemented a robust program to train physician assistants in hyperacute stroke care. Evaluation/Results: Through vast stakeholder engagement and implementing a multitude of change ideas, by March of 2018 we had achieved an average DTN of 53 minutes. Our door-to-triage time went from an average of 7 minutes to 3 minutes. Our door-to-CT time decreased from 17 minutes to 7 minutes and our time between CT and CTA from an average of 13 minutes to 3 minutes. One and a half years later, our average DTN is maintained at 55 minutes and physician assistants continue to effectively lead and liaise with telestroke neurologists and stroke patients. Discussion/Impact: Prior to this program, acute stroke care was a very contentious topic at our local community hospital. Creating a program that streamlined the care and standardized the work has proven successful, and not only allowed for improved DTN times but also freed up physicians to better simultaneously care for other acutely ill patients.

Introduction: Acute pharyngitis is a common emergency department (ED) presentation. The Centor (Modified/McIsaac) score uses five criteria (age, tonsillar exudates, swollen tender anterior cervical nodes, absence of a cough, and history of fever) to predict Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infection. The recommendation is patients with a Centor score of 0-1 should not undergo testing and should not be given antibiotics, patients with a score of 2-3 may warrant throat cultures, and for patients with a score ≥ 4, empiric antibiotics may be appropriate. Associated pain is often first managed with acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, however recent evidence suggests a short course of low-to-moderate dose corticosteroids as adjunctive therapy may reduce inflammation and provide pain relief. The objective of this study was to describe the ED management of acute pharyngitis for adult patients presenting to an academic ED over a two-year study period. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of all adult (> 17 years) patients presenting to Mount Sinai Hospital ED with a discharge diagnosis of acute pharyngitis (ICD-10 code J02.9) from January 1st 2016 to December 31st 2018. Trained research personnel reviewed medical records and extracted data using a computerized, data abstraction form. Results: Of the 638 patients included in the study, 286 (44.8%) had a Centor score of 0-1, 328 (51.4%) had a score of 2-3, and 24 (3.8%) had a score of ≥ 4. Of those with a Centor score of 0-1, 83 (29.0%) had a throat culture, 88 (30.8%) were prescribed antibiotics, 15 (5.2%) were positive for GAS and 74 (25.9%) were given corticosteroids in the ED or at discharge. Of those with a Centor score of 2-3, 156 (47.6%) had a throat culture, 220 (67.1%) were prescribed antibiotics, 44 (13.4%) were positive for GAS, and 145 (44.2%) were given corticosteroids. Of those with a Centor score ≥ 4, 14 (58.3%) had a throat culture, 18 (75.0%) were prescribed antibiotics, 7 (29.2%) were positive for GAS and 12 (50.0%) were given corticosteroids. Conclusion: As predicted, a higher Centor score was associated with higher risk of GAS infection, increased antibiotic prescribing and use of corticosteroids. Many patients with low Centor scores were prescribed antibiotics and also had throat cultures. Further work is required to understand clinical decision making for the management of acute pharyngitis.

Introduction: Patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) for the sole purpose of requesting prescriptions are problematic. Problematic for the patient, who may have a long wait to be seen and may leave dissatisfied. Problematic for the ED physician, who is in the business of episodic not comprehensive care and is diligently trying to avoid the misappropriation of medications. The primary objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of patients who present to the ED or Urgent Care Centre (UCC) requesting a prescription, the nature of these requests and the resulting action by the attending physician. The secondary objective was to determine the proportion of medication requests and responses that have potential street value. With this knowledge we may be better positioned to serve these patients and support physician decision-making. Methods: This was a single-centre, retrospective electronic chart review looking at all adult patients with a presenting complaint of medication request who attended a two-site tertiary ED or an Urgent Care Centre (UCC) in London, Ontario between April 1, 2014 and June 30, 2017. Data was tested for normality and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 1923 cases met the inclusion criteria. Cases were removed (n = 421) if it was unclear which prescription was requested or if a non-medication prescription or injection was requested. The patient median (IQR) age was 44 (32-54) with 58% being male and 55% having a family doctor. There were a total of 2261 prescriptions requested by 1502 patients. The top 3 most commonly requested classes of medications were opioids 433/1502 (28.8%), antidepressants/antipsychotics 371/1502 (24.7%) and benzodiazepines 252/1502 (16.8%). The median (IQR) wait time was 73 minutes (35-128). 298/1502 (19.8%) of patients received their requested prescription (opioids 12.7%; antidepressant/antipsychotic 55.3% and benzodiazepines 16.3%). 740/1502 (49.3%) of patients requested a medication that had street value. Of those, 118/740 (15.9%) received the requested medication. Conclusion: There is no “one size fits all” solution for the patient who presents to the ED requesting a prescription. The large number of requests for psychiatric medications suggests a service gap for mental health patients in the community. This data supports the need for comprehensive electronic medication records to guide physicians’ decisions.

Background: Most emergency departments (ED) utilize medical directives to initiate lab investigations for patients prior to physician assessment. This practice facilitates expedited patient care in the ED, resulting in safer and efficient care. However, some patients choose to leave the ED prior to seeing a physician due to prolonged waiting. Previously, at our hospital there was no defined process for identifying and following up on abnormal test results on patients that leave without being seen (LWBS), resulting in lab results often not being reviewed by a nurse or physician. Aim Statement: By April 2020, we aim to have 90% of ED LWBS patients with abnormal results identified and followed up. Measures & Design: A series of consultations and information gathering occurred that included an environmental scan of other EDs and discussions with emergency nurses, emergency physicians, Risk Management, Legal Department, College of Nurses of Ontario and Canadian Medical Protective Association. A process map was developed collaboratively to standardize the process to identify and follow up on abnormal investigations of LWBS patients and a new hospital policy was developed to officially outline this process. The following are the family of measures: Outcome measure – % LWBS patients with abnormal tests that had follow-up documented in chart Process measure – Number LWBS patients with investigations initiated by medical directive, Number LWBS patients, % LWBS patients Balancing measure – Satisfaction of nurses with new process for LWBS patients Evaluation/Results: At baseline, 29% of LWBS patients with abnormal lab results had follow up documented in the chart. After implementation of the new standardized process and policy, the follow up rate of LWBS patients with abnormal results in August, September and October 2019 was 47%, 28% and 29% respectively. Discussion/Impact: These results indicate that standardization and new policy implementation is insufficient to change practice, even one that aims to provide safer patient care. Nevertheless, these interventions are important first steps to improving the safety for ED LWBS patients. We plan to implement an audit and feedback approach to encourage nursing staff to routinely check lab results on LWBS patients.

Innovation Concept: Is there a healthcare provider on board? Healthcare providers may be less confident for in-flight medical emergencies (IFME), as these situations are not part of usual curriculum or practice contexts (e.g. hospitals). For example, the literature reveals that medical students and physicians lack IFME basic knowledge and preparedness. The goal is to pilot a training session for healthcare providers to improve their confidence in navigating IFME. Methods: This training innovation involved: i) a session to crowdsource insights from multidisciplinary healthcare and first aid providers, followed by reviewing considerations of a CMAJ 2018 article on airplane emergencies, and ii) 2 airplane simulations (syncope and cardiac arrest). During crowdsourcing, 7 IFME learning objectives were explored: i) challenges, ii) solutions, iii) equipment, iv) taking vitals, v) general approach, vi) cardiac arrest approach, and vii) human resources / role-delegation. Knowledge and approaches extracted were then applied in simulations. Participants provided scores out of 7.00 for: i) satisfaction of crowdsourcing session and simulation and ii) self-rated confidence on learning objectives at baseline, post-crowdsourcing session, and post-simulation. Results were analyzed with repeated measures ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: The workshop curriculum was a crowdsourcing session and simulation to mentally rehearse and practice clinical skills in airplane settings to improve IFME preparedness. Conclusion: Participants rated the crowdsourcing activity (6.70/7.00, n = 11) and simulation (6.50/7.00, n = 11) positively. Confidence in the 7 topics improved from baseline (2.49/7.00) to post-crowdsourcing (5.23/7.00) to post-simulation (5.94/7.00). Significant differences (p < 0.01) between baseline and post-crowdsourcing, and between baseline and post-simulation were observed. There was no significant difference between post-crowdsourcing and post-simulation. One simulation limitation was not all could be rescuers; therefore, debriefing is important to meet learning objectives. Second, the simulation was not within an airplane; housing simulations inside an airplane with flight attendants is a potential next step. Overall, self-confidence in topics of IFME may improve after just one crowdsourcing session, facilitated through group discussions and mental rehearsal. Added simulations may maintain self-confidence on these topics, by promoting memory retention through active learning and repetition.

Introduction: Cricothyrotomy is an intervention performed to salvage “can't intubate, can't ventilate” situations. Studies have shown poor accuracy landmarking the cricothyroid membrane, particularly in female patients by surgeons and anesthesiologists. There is less data available about emergency physician performance. This study examines the perceived versus actual success rate of landmarking the cricothyroid membrane by resident and staff emergency physicians using obese and non-obese models. Methods: Five male and female volunteers were selected as models. Each model was placed supine, and a point-of-care ultrasound expert landmarked the borders of each cricothyroid membrane. 20 residents and 15 staff emergency physicians were given one attempt to landmark five models. Data was gathered on each participant's perceived likelihood of success and attempt difficulty. Overall accuracy and accuracy stratified by sex and obesity status were calculated. Results: Overall landmarking accuracy amongst all participants was 58% (SD 18%). A difference in accuracy was found for obese males (88%) versus obese females (40%) (difference = 48%, 95% CI = 30-65%, p < 0.0001); and non-obese males (77%) versus non-obese females (46%) (difference = 31%, 95% CI = 12-51%, p = 0.004). There was no association between perceived difficulty and success (correlation = 0.07, 95% CI=−0.081-0.214, p = 0.37). Confidence levels overall were higher amongst staff physicians (3.0) than residents (2.7) (difference = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1-0.6, p = 0.02), but there was no correlation between confidence in an attempt and its success (p = 0.33). Conclusion: We found that physicians demonstrate significantly lower accuracy when landmarking cricothyroid membranes of females. Emergency physicians were unable to predict their own accuracy while landmarking, which can potentially lead to increased failed attempts and longer time to secure the airway. Improved training techniques and a modified approach to cricothyrotomy may reduce failed attempts and improve the time to secure the airway.

Introduction: Procedural skills are a key component of an emergency physician's practice. The Edmonton Zone is a health region that comprises twelve tertiary, urban community and rural community emergency departments (EDs) and represents over three hundred emergency physicians. This study describes the current attitudes toward procedural skill competency, current procedural skill practices, and the role for educational skills training sessions among emergency medicine physicians within a geographical health region. Methods: Multicenter descriptive cross-sectional survey of all emergency medicine physicians working at 12 emergency departments within the Edmonton Zone in 2019 (n = 274). The survey underwent several phases of systematic review; including item generation and reduction, pilot testing, and clinical sensibility testing. Survey items addressed current procedural skill performance frequency, perceived importance and confidence, current methods to maintain competence, barriers and facilitating factors to participation in a curriculum, preferred teaching methods, and desired frequency of practice for each procedural skill. Results: Survey response rate was 53.6%. Variability in frequency of performed procedures was apparent across the type of hospital sites. For majority of skills, there was a significantly positive correlation between the frequency at which a skill was performed and the perceived confidence performing said skill. There was inconsistency and no significant correlation with perceived importance, perceived confidence, or frequency performing a given skill and the desired frequency of training for that skill. Course availability (76.2%) and time (72.8%) are the most common identified barriers to participation in procedural skills training. Conclusion: This study summarized the current emergency department procedural skill practices and attitudes toward procedural skill competency and an educational curriculum among emergency medicine physicians in Edmonton. This represents a step towards targeted continuing professional development in the growing realm of competency-based medical education.

Introduction: Most emergency departments (ED) in Canada have a population of high frequency users that present to the ED on a regular basis. These patients are well described in the literature and typically defined by a frequency of 8-10 visits/year. In Thunder Bay, Ontario we have a significant population of patients that present more often that we have termed “super-users”. These patients often are typically from a vulnerable population with multiple co-morbidities and a high mortality rate. Although their risk for poor health outcomes is well recognized, both the chronicity and complexity of their symptoms often contributes to diagnostic dilemmas. The decision to order a computed tomography (CT) scan can be a difficult balance between ruling out life threatening diagnoses and exposing the patient to excessive radiation. Our objective was to describe how often these super-users of the ED received a CT scan and what types of imaging were completed. Methods: The Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre is a geographically isolated hospital in Northwestern Ontario with the next closest hospital based CT scanner greater than 300 km away. Based on previous literature and our preliminary scoping of the super-user group, we have identified a minimum of 25 visits as the threshold. A retrospective chart review was conducted for the year 2017 using our electronic medical record. Patient demographic data was collected along with the type and number of CT scans into a standardized collection tool. Results: Our preliminary results showed that our total population of super-users was 75 patients with an average of 32 visits to the ED per year. A total of 76% of the patients had a CT scan completed at least once. On average these patients have a CT during 10% of their visits with head CT comprising 50% of the imaging and abdominal/pelvis imaging comprising another 45%. For 20% of these super-users, they had CTs on 20% of their visits. From this population, only 10% of the patients had surgery in 2017 while 7% of visits required admission to hospital. The most common diagnoses for these patient visits relate to mental health/addictions, gastrointestinal complaints and infection. Conclusion: This study has shown that a significant number of our super-user population are receiving multiple CTs. Our next step is collect data on individual radiation doses and calculate exposure risks. We hope to inform policy and decision-makers who are developing programs to treat the underlying cause of their high resource use.

Introduction: In 2010, Alberta Health Services (AHS) introduced Transition Coordinators (TC), a unique nursing role focused on assessment of elderly patients to support safe discharge home. The objective of this study is to describe patient characteristics to predict safe discharge for seniors (≥65 years of age) and identify barriers that can be used to improve ED outcomes for these patients. Methods: Two trained research assistants conducted a chart review of the TC referral form and the ED Information System (EDIS) for patients seen by TCs between April and June 2017. Information on patient characteristics, existing home care and community services, the index ED visit and subsequent revisits were extracted. Data were entered into a purpose-built database in REDCap. A descriptive analysis was conducted; results are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), median (interquartile range [IQR]), or proportions, as appropriate. Results: A total of 1411 patients with TC referral forms were included (779 [55%] female). The majority of these patients were ≥65 (1350 [96%]) with a mean age of 82 ± 9.6. The majority of patients were triaged as a CTAS of 3 (835 [59%]) with the most common reasons for presentation including: shortness of breath (128 [9%]), abdominal pain (94 [6.7%]), and general weakness (81 [5.7%]). Nearly one third of patients (391 [30%]) were already receiving home care services; (96 [7%]) received a new home care referral as a result of their ED visit. Of all the patients, 1111 (79%) had comorbidities (median: 3 [IQR: 1 to 5]). Overall, 38% (n = 536) patients had visited the ED in the 12 months prior to the index with a median of 2 [IQR: 1 to 4) visits. On average, patient's length of stay for their index visits was 12 ± 0.35 hours. Admissions occurred for 599 [42%] patients with delays being common; the mean time between the decision to admit and the patient leaving the ED was 6 hrs ± 0.23. Conclusion: Seniors in the ED are complex patients who experience long lengths of stay and frequent delays in decision-making. Upon discharge, few patients receive referrals to community supports, potentially increasing the likelihood of revisits and readmissions. Future studies should assess whether the presence of TCs is associated with better outcomes in the community.

Introduction: Prehospital sepsis alerts assist paramedics in identifying patients with sepsis and in communicating this diagnosis to receiving facilities. Following the prospective implementation study of our regional systemic inflammatory response syndrome-based alert criteria (Alert), the purpose of this sub-study was to determine the cause of Alert false negatives (patients without an Alert that subsequently met sepsis criteria in the Emergency Department (ED)). Additionally, the sensitivity of the Alert for detecting sepsis was compared to the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and Hamilton Early Warning Score (HEWS). Methods: This study was an additional analysis of the prospective Alert implementation study. Included patients were ≥ 18 years old, transported by a regional Emergency Medical Service and met severe sepsis or septic shock criteria (SS/SS, 2012 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines) in regional EDs in 2013. False negative patients were identified prospectively and reviewed by comparing paramedic determined Alert status to the retrospective application of the Alert criteria to Paramedic Call Report (PCR) data. The Alert sensitivity was first calculated from prospective data, then retrospective sensitivities of the Alert, qSOFA and HEWS were calculated by retrospectively applying these tools to PCRs, using ED diagnosis of SS/SS as reference standard. Results: In 2013, 229 patients met SS/SS criteria in the ED and had PCRs available; 115 (50.2%) were male and median age [interquartile range] was 76.0 [63.0-84.0]. Of 229, 149 (65.0%) arrived in the ED without an Alert (false negatives) and 46 (30.9%) of these met Alert criteria retrospectively and were therefore missed by paramedics. Sensitivity of the Alert was 34.9% when applied by paramedics and 41.5% when applied retrospectively to PCRs. The retrospective sensitivities of the qSOFA and HEWS were 37.6% and 67.7%, respectively. Conclusion: In ED patients diagnosed with SS/SS who arrived with no Alert, the majority (69.1%) were missed by the Alert criteria, rather than by paramedic application of the tool. The Alert had a sensitivity of 34.9%. When applied retrospectively and compared to the Alert, qSOFA had similar sensitivity and HEWS had increased sensitivity. Future research should focus on deriving improved alerts or implementing those with higher accuracy, such as HEWS.

Introduction: Choosing Wisely Nova Scotia (CWNS), an affiliate of Choosing Wisely Canada™ (CWC), aims to address unnecessary care and testing through literature-informed lists developed by various disciplines. CWC has identified unnecessary head CTs among the top five interventions to question in the Emergency Department (ED). Zyluk (2015) determined the Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) as the most effective clinical decision rule in adults with minor head injuries. To better understand the current status of CCHR use in Nova Scotia, we conducted a retrospective audit of patient charts at the Charles V. Keating Emergency and Trauma Center, in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Methods: Our mixed methods design included a literature review, retrospective chart audit, and a qualitative audit-feedback component with participating physicians. The chart audit applied the guidelines for adherence to the CCHR and reported on the level of compliance within the ED. Analysis of qualitative data is included here, in parallel with in-depth to contextualize findings from the audit. Results: 302 charts of patients having presented to the surveyed site were retrospectively reviewed. Of the 37 cases where a CT head was indicated as per the CCHR, a CT was ordered 32 (86.5%) times. Of the 176 cases where a CT head was not indicated, a CT was not ordered 155 (88.1%) times. Therefore, the CCHR was followed in 187 (87.8%) of the total 213 cases where the CCHR should be applied. Conclusion: Our study reveals adherence to the CCHR in 87.8% of cases at this ED. Identifying contextual factors that facilitate or hinder the application of CCHR in practice is critical for reducing unnecessary CTs. This work has been presented to the physician group to gain physician engagement and to elucidate enablers and barriers to guideline adherence. In light of the frequency of CT heads ordered EDs, even a small reduction would be impactful.

Background: In Canada, injuries represent 21% of Emergency Department (ED) visits. Faced with occupational injuries, physicians may feel pressured to provide urgent imaging to facilitate expedited return to work. There is not a body of literature to support this practice. Twenty percent of adult ED injuries involve workers compensation. Aim Statement: Tacit pressures were felt to impact imaging rates for patients with workplace injuries, and our aim was to determine if this hypothesis was accurate. We conducted a quality review to assess imaging rates among injuries suffered at work and outside work. A secondary aim was to reduce the harm resulting from non-value-added testing. Measures & Design: Information was collected from the Emergency Department Information System on patients with acute injuries over the age of 16-years including upper limb, lower limb, neck, back and head injuries. Data included both workplace and non-work-related presentations, Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) levels and age at presentation. Imaging included any of X-ray, CT, MRI, or Ultrasound ordered in EDs across the central zone of Nova Scotia from July 1, 2009 to June 30, 2019. A total of 282,860 patient-encounters were included for analysis. Comparison was made between patients presenting under the Workers’ Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (WCB) and those covered by the Department of Health and Wellness (DOHW). Imaging rates for all injuries were also trended over this ten-year period. Evaluation/Results: In patients between 16 and 65-years, the WCB group underwent more imaging (55.3% of visits) than did the DOHW group (43.1% of visits). In the same cohort, there was an overall decrease of over 10% in mean imaging rates for both WBC and DOHW between the first five-year period (2009-2013) and the second five-year study period (2013-2018). Imaging rates for WCB and DOHW converged with each decade beyond 35 years of age. No comparison was possible beyond 85-years, due to the absence of WCB presentations. Discussion/Impact: Patients presenting to the ED with workplace injuries are imaged at a higher rate than those covered by the DOHW. Campaigns promoting value-added care may have impacted imaging rates during the ten-year study period, explaining the decline in ED imaging for all injuries. While this 10% decrease in overall imaging is encouraging, these preliminary data indicate the need for further education on resource stewardship, especially for patients presenting to the ED with workplace injuries.

Introduction: As the availability of Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) to rule out pulmonary embolism (PE) increases, so too does its utilization, and consequent overutilization. A variety of evidence-based algorithms and decision rules using clinical criteria and D-Dimer testing have been proposed as instruments to allow physicians to safely rule out a PE in low-risk patients. However, studies have shown mixed results with respect to both physician uptake of these decision rules and their impact on improving ordering practices among physicians. The objective of this study is to describe the prevalence of D-Dimer utilization among ED physicians and its impact on positive yield rates of CTPAs in a community setting. Methods: Data was collected on all CTPA studies ordered by ED physicians at two very high-volume community hospitals and an affiliated urgent care centre during the 2-year period between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. For each CTPA, we determined if 1) a D-Dimer had been ordered prior to CTPA, if 2) the D-Dimer was positive, and if 3) the CTPA was positive for a PE. Using a chi-square test, we compared the diagnostic yield for those patients who had a D-Dimer prior to their CTPA and those who did not. Results: A total of 2,811 CTPAs were included in the analysis. Of these, 964 CTPAs (34.3%) were ordered without a D-Dimer. Of those 1,847 patients who underwent D-Dimer testing prior to the CTPA, 343 (18.7%) underwent a CTPA despite a negative D-Dimer. When compared as a group, those CTPAs preceded by a D-Dimer showed no significant difference in positive yields when compared to those CTPAs ordered without a prior D-Dimer (9.9% versus 11.3%, p = 0.26). Conclusion: The findings of this study present a complicated picture of the impact of D-Dimer utilization on CTPA ordering patterns. There is evidence of suboptimal uptake of routine D-Dimer ordering, and adherence to guidelines in terms of forgoing CTPAs in low-risk patients with negative D-Dimers. While this study design leaves unanswered the question of how many CTPAs were avoided as a result of a negative D-Dimer, the finding of a similar positive yield among those patients who had a D-Dimer ordered versus those who did not is interesting, and illustrative of the issues arising from the high false-positive rates associated with D-Dimer screening.

Background: Preliminary reports and subsequent immediate management decisions of radiological scans are often performed by emergency physicians and on-call radiology residents. Many academic hospitals have resident-only coverage for after-hour shifts. Generally, these preliminary reports are eventually reviewed by a staff radiologist, during which discrepancies may be identified. Depending on the severity of the discrepancy and the time taken to notify the treating physician, there is potential for significant impact on the patient's care. Aim Statement: In an attempt to identify and minimize errors in radiological readings, and to improve the communication of discrepancies, our project aims to retrospectively audit all radiological discrepancies that have occurred at The Ottawa Hospital's emergency departments from April 2018 to May 2019. Measures & Designs: A systematic review of all cases with noted radiological discrepancies was obtained from the Picture Archive and Communication System software and EPIC platform. Analysis of these cases will allow us to define when errors occur, what is the type and severity of the error, how long it took to relay the discrepancy to a treating physician, and what was the subsequent management impact. Evaluation/Results: We discovered 712 cases with radiological reading discrepancies, 168 major, 527 minor, and 17 incidentals. Interestingly, a significant portion of major (severely affecting care/life-threatning) discrepancies were reported from radiology residents, especially on CT images, although emergency physicians had the most discrepancies (mostly minor). Radiology residents were seen to have more discrepant reports during after-hour services while emergency physicians did not show any specific pattern of discrepant reporting. The average time to report a major discrepancy to a treating physician is 8.8 hours, where the maximum time taken was 104 hours and the minimum was 0.2 hours. 56% of reports with major discrepancies made no mention of who was notified. Discussion/Impact: By identifying weak points in radiological reporting, our results will allow us to provide suggestions at an administration and teaching level to minimize discrepancies. It is critical to create a workflow where mistakes are mitigated, and communication is efficient and standardized to prevent patient harm from delayed or incorrect diagnosis.

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an integral tool in the modern emergency physician's toolkit. Evidence suggests many imaging and lab investigations are ordered without true medical indications; it is unknown how POCUS utilization impacts health care costs at a patient level. The purpose of this study was to assess whether POCUS use in the emergency department (ED) was associated with cost savings via decreased laboratory and radiographic testing. Methods: POCUMON is a single-center, prospective pilot study. The participants were a convenience sample of ED staff physicians and PGY-5 Emergency Medicine (EM) residents working in the ED from July-October 2019. Physicians who used POCUS as part of their assessment had the cost of their patient investigation plans compared with those proposed by a control group of ED physicians simultaneously on-shift. The control group was blinded to the POCUS findings but had access to the patient and medical record. The lab investigations and imaging studies ordered by both groups were recorded with respective costs. Data were analyzed using a paired T-test, with sub-group analyses. Ethics approval was obtained from the Queen's University HSREB (No.6026732). Results: 50 patient assessments using POCUS were captured in the study period. 76% of patient assessments were performed by EM staff physicians; 94% of control assessments were provided by EM staff physicians. Patient chief complaints included abdominal pain (7), chest pain/dyspnea (10), flank pain (3), pregnancy concerns (4), trauma (7), extremity complaints (4), back pain (3), and other (12). The POCUS group had a trend for lower number of laboratory tests (4.7 ± 0.44 vs 5.22 ± 0.39; p = 0.28) and imaging studies (0.94 ± 0.14 vs 1.1 ± 0.11; p = 0.33). Overall health care costs were similar in both groups, with a trend to cost savings in the POCUS group ($142.00 ± 15.44 vs $174.60 ± 17.00; p = 0.12). Subgrouping identified significant cost savings in the POCUS group for patients with a chief complaint of flank pain ($43.64 vs $248.82, p = 0.01). Conclusion: POCUS use was not associated with significant health care cost savings. ED POCUS usage did see a trend towards decreased laboratory and imaging investigations. Patients presenting with flank pain had significantly lower expenditures associated with their visit when POCUS was incorporated into their assessment. Large scale prospective studies are needed to investigate if POCUS is associated with cost-savings in ED patients.

Introduction: Competency based medical education (CBME) has triggered widespread utilization of workplace-based assessment (WBA) tools in postgraduate training programs. These WBAs predominately use rating scales with entrustment anchors, such as the Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE). However, little is known about the factors that influence a supervising physician's decision to assign a particular rating on scales using entrustment anchors. This study aimed to identify the factors that influence supervisors’ ratings of trainees using WBA tools with entrustment anchors at the time of assessment and to explore the experiences with and challenges of using entrustment anchors in the emergency department (ED). Methods: A convenience sample of full-time emergency medicine (EM) faculty were recruited from two sites within a single academic Canadian EM hospital system. Fifty semi-structured interviews were conducted with EM physicians within two hours of completing a WBA for an EM trainee. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and independently analyzed by two members of the research team. Themes were stratified by trainee level, rating and task. Results: Interviews involved 73% (27/37) of all EM staff and captured assessments completed on 83% (37/50) of EM trainees. The mean WBA rating of studied samples was 4.34 ± 0.77 (2 to 5), which was similar to the mean rating of all WBAs completed during the study period. Overall, six major factors were identified that influenced staff WBA ratings: amount of guidance required, perceived competence through discussion and questioning, trainee experience, clinical context, past experience working with the trainee, and perceived confidence. The majority of staff denied struggling to assign ratings. However, when they did struggle, it involved the interpretation of WBA anchors and their application to the clinical context in the ED. Conclusion: Several factors appear to be taken into account by clinical supervisors when they make decisions regarding the particular rating that they will assign a trainee on a WBA that uses entrustment anchors. Not all of these factors are specific to that particular clinical encounter. The results from this study further our understanding on the use of entrustment anchors within the ED and may facilitate faculty development regarding WBA completion as we move forward in CBME.

Introduction: Trauma resuscitations are sporadic high acuity situations that can be difficult to assess for areas of quality improvement. We aim to analyse the type of observation that occurs during trauma resuscitations and outcomes that develop as a result. Methods: Medline was searched from 1946 to May 2019 for studies involving direct observation of trauma resuscitation. English studies of both adult and pediatric populations from 2000 onwards were included for study. They were compared for type of observation (in-person vs video) as well as primary outcomes of their observation and any quality improvement as a result. Results: A total of 413 publications were identified with 10 meeting eligibility for inclusion. All 10 studies underwent video review with no in-person review being performed. The most common primary outcome was analysis of a critical procedure (6 studies), with tracheal intubation being studied in 4 studies and thoracotomy and vascular access each being studied once. The remaining studies measured communication styles and team effectiveness. Overall 5 of the 10 studies resulted in new policies being put in place for trauma resuscitations, including; use of interosseous lines as first lines in trauma patients in extremis, tracheal intubation check list, and continuing with medical student participation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Conclusion: This study highlights some of the common focuses of trauma resuscitation observation; critical procedures, team dynamics and communication. A majority of studies focused on critical procedures during resuscitations and quality improvement in the form of checklists to improve them. Remaining studies focused on equally important aspects of team functioning and communication which can be more difficult to objectively measure and derive quality improvement measures for. These studies led an emphasis on use of a horizontal assessment style and closed loop communication in all their trauma resuscitation.