Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:27:53.963Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of thermocapillary stress on slip length for a channel textured with parallel ridges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2017

Marc Hodes*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Toby L. Kirk
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Georgios Karamanis
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
Scott MacLachlan
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
*
Email address for correspondence: marc.hodes@tufts.edu

Abstract

We compute the apparent hydrodynamic slip length for (laminar and fully developed) Poiseuille flow of liquid through a heated parallel-plate channel. One side of the channel is textured with parallel (streamwise) ridges and the opposite one is smooth. On the textured side of the channel, the liquid is in the Cassie state. No-slip and constant heat flux boundary conditions are imposed at the solid–liquid interfaces along the tips of the ridges, and the menisci between ridges are considered to be flat and adiabatic. The smooth side of the channel is subjected to no-slip and adiabatic boundary conditions. We account for the streamwise and transverse thermocapillary stresses along menisci. When the latter is sufficiently small, Stokes flow may be assumed. Then, our solution is based upon a conformal map. When, additionally, the ratio of channel height to half of the ridge pitch is of order 1 or larger, an accurate but less cumbersome solution follows from a matched asymptotic expansion. When inertial effects are relevant, the slip length is numerically computed. Setting the thermocapillary stress equal to zero yields the slip length for an adiabatic flow.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANSYS2013 ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc.Google Scholar
Baier, T., Steffes, C. & Hardt, S. 2010a Numerical modelling of thermocapillary flow on superhydrophobic surfaces. In 14th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences. Chemical and Biological Microsystems Society.Google Scholar
Baier, T., Steffes, C. & Hardt, S. 2010b Thermocapillary flow on superhydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 82 (3), 037301.Google Scholar
Bergman, T. L., Incropera, F. P., DeWitt, D. P. & Lavine, A. S. 2011 Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cottin-Bizonne, C., Steinberger, A., Cross, B., Raccurt, O. & Charlaix, E. 2008 Nanohydrodynamics: the intrinsic flow boundary condition on smooth surfaces. Langmuir 24 (4), 11651172.Google Scholar
Crowdy, D. 2010 Slip length for longitudinal shear flow over a dilute periodic mattress of protruding bubbles. Phys. Fluids 22 (12), 121703.Google Scholar
Crowdy, D. 2011 Frictional slip lengths for unidirectional superhydrophobic grooved surfaces. Phys. Fluids 23 (7), 072001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enright, R., Hodes, M., Salamon, T. & Muzychka, Y. 2014 Isoflux Nusselt number and slip length formulae for superhydrophobic microchannels. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 136 (1), 012402-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradshteyn, I. & Ryzhik, I. 2014 Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic.Google Scholar
Hodes, M., Lam, L., Cowley, A., Enright, R. & MacLachlan, S. 2015 Effect of evaporation and condensation at menisci on apparent thermal slip. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 137, 071502-1.Google Scholar
Huang, D., Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Netz, R. & Bocquet, L. 2008 Water slippage versus contact angle: a quasiuniversal relationship. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirk, T. L., Hodes, M. & Papageorgiou, D. T. 2017 Nusselt numbers for Poiseuille flow over isoflux parallel ridges accounting for meniscus curvature. J. Fluid Mech. 811, 315349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, L., Hodes, M. & Enright, R. 2015 Analysis of Galinstan-based microgap cooling enhancement using structured surfaces. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 137, 091003-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauga, E. & Stone, H. A. 2003 Effective slip in pressure-driven Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 489, 5577.Google Scholar
Lee, C., Choi, C. & Kim, C. 2008 Structured surfaces for a giant liquid slip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (6), 064501.Google Scholar
Lemmon, E., McLinden, M. & Friend, D. 2015 Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. In NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69 (ed. Linstrom, P. J. & Mallard, W. G.), National Institute of Standards and Technology; http://webbook.nist.gov, (retrieved 10 May 2015).Google Scholar
Lin, C. & Segal, L. 1988 Mathematics Applied to Deterministic Problems in the Natural Sciences. SIAM.Google Scholar
Maynes, D., Jeffs, K., Woolford, B. & Webb, B. 2007 Laminar flow in a microchannel with hydrophobic surface patterned microribs oriented parallel to the flow direction. Phys. Fluids 19 (9), 093603.Google Scholar
Navier, C. 1823 Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Mém. Acad. R. Sci. Inst. Fr. 6, 389440.Google Scholar
Ng, C., Chu, H. & Wang, C. 2010 On the effects of liquid–gas interfacial shear on slip flow through a parallel-plate channel with superhydrophobic grooved walls. Phys. Fluids 22 (10), 102002.Google Scholar
Papoutsakis, E., Ramkrishna, D. & Lim, H. 1980 The extended Graetz problem with prescribed wall flux. AIChE J. 26 (5), 779787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patankar, S., Liu, C. & Sparrow, E. 1977 Fully developed flow and heat transfer in ducts having streamwise-periodic variations of cross-sectional area. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 99 (2), 180186.Google Scholar
Philip, J. 1972a Flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 353372.Google Scholar
Philip, J. 1972b Integral properties of flows satisfying mixed no-slip and no-shear conditions. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 23, 960968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokhorenko, V. Y., Roshchupkin, V. V., Pokrasin, M. A., Prokhorenko, S. V. & Kotov, V. V. 2000 Liquid gallium: potential uses as a heat-transfer agent. High Temp. USSR 38 (6), 954968.Google Scholar
Quéré, D. 2005 Non-sticking drops. Rep. Prog. Phys. 68 (11), 24952532.Google Scholar
Sbragaglia, M. & Prosperetti, A. 2007 A note on the effective slip properties for microchannel flows with ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Phys. Fluids 19 (4), 043603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teo, C. & Khoo, B. 2009 Analysis of Stokes flow in microchannels with superhydrophobic surfaces containing a periodic array of micro-grooves. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 7 (3), 353382.Google Scholar
Teo, C. & Khoo, B. 2010 Flow past superhydrophobic surfaces containing longitudinal grooves: effects of interface curvature. Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9 (2–3), 499511.Google Scholar
Ybert, C., Barentin, C., Cottin-Bizonne, C., Joseph, P. & Bocquet, L. 2007 Achieving large slip with superhydrophobic surfaces: scaling laws for generic geometries. Phys. Fluids 19, 123601.Google Scholar