Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T19:22:11.283Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Thin Film Diamond Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2011

Bernard A. Pailthorpe
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. San Diego Supercomputer Center, PO Box 85608, San Diego, Ca. 92138-5608 U.S.A.
Peter Knight
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The growth of synthetic diamond thin films is studied by molecular dynamics computer simulations of low energy carbon atom deposition onto a low temperature diamond (111) surface. A previously reported Stillinger Weber potential, reparameterised for sp3 bonding in carbon using Hartree-Fock calculations for small carbon clusters, is used to model the interatomic interactions. The penetration of 1-100eV neutral carbon atoms into a (111) surface of carbon at 100K and the resultant surface atom rearrangements and induced film stress are studied. For intermediate energies (20-60eV) the incident atoms penetrate beneath the exposed (111) surface and increase the lateral compressive stress in the diamond film. It is suggested that diamond films grow from below the exposed surface in a region of locally high stress and tetrahedral coordination. The predicted radial distribution functions agree reasonably with electron diffraction studies of vacuum arc deposited amorphous diamond.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Angus, J.C. and Hayman, C.C., Science 241, 913 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Yarbrough, W.A and Messier, R., Science 247, 688 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Koshland, D. E. Jr., Science 250, 1637 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Stillinger, F.H. and Weber, T.A., Phys. Rev. B, 31 5262 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Mahon, P., Pailthorpe, B.A. and Bacskay, G., Phil. Mag. B, (in press, 1991).Google Scholar
6. Pailthorpe, B.A. and Mahon, P., Thin Solid Films, 193/194, 34 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Tersoff, J., Phys. Rev. Letts., 56, 632 (1986); 61, 2879 (1988).Google Scholar
8. Bolding, B. C. and Anderson, H.C., Phys. Rev. B, 41, 10586 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Galli, J., Martin, R. M., Car, R. and Parrinello, M., Phys. Rev. Letts., 60, 204 (1988); 63 988 (1989); Science, 250, 1547 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Zallen, R., The Physics of Amorphous Solids. Wiley, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
11. Berger, S. D., McKenzie, D.R. and Martin, P. J., Phil. Mag. Lett., 57, 285 (1988).Google Scholar
12. McKenzie, D.R., Muller, D., Pailthorpe, B.A., Wang, Z. H., Krautchinskaia, E., Segal, D., Lukins, P. B., Swift, P. D., Martin, P. J., Amaratunga, G. and Gaskell, P. H., Surface & Coatings Technol., (in press, 1991).Google Scholar