Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T13:38:20.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON THE $n$TH QUANTUM DERIVATIVE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2003

J. MARSHALL ASH
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA mash@math.depaul.eduscatoiu@math.depaul.edu
STEFAN CATOIU
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA mash@math.depaul.eduscatoiu@math.depaul.edu
RICARDO RÍOS-COLLANTES-DE-TERÁN
Affiliation:
Departamento de Análisis Matemático, Facultad de Matemáticas, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo. 1160, Sevilla 41080, Spainrori@cica.es
Get access

Abstract

The $n$ th quantum derivative ${\cal D}_nf(x)$ of the real-valued function $f$ is defined for each real non-zero $x$ as \[ \lim_{q\to 1}\frac{\displaystyle\sum\limits^n_{k=0}(-1)^k\left[\begin{array}{c}n\\k\end{array}\right]_qq^{(k-1)k/2}f(q^{n-k}x)}{q^{(n-1)n/2}(q-1)^nx^n}, \] where $\left[\begin{array}{c}n\\k\end{array}\right]_q$ the $q$ -binomial coefficient. If the $n$ th Peano derivative exists at $x$ , which is to say that if $f$ can be approximated by an $n$ th degree polynomial at the point $x$ , then it is not hard to see that ${\cal D}_nf(x)$ must also exist at that point. Consideration of the function $|1-x|$ at $x=1$ shows that the second quantum derivative is more general than the second Peano derivative. However, it can be shown that the existence of the $n$ th quantum derivative at each point of a set necessarily implies the existence of the $n$ th Peano derivative at almost every point of that set.

Type
Notes and Papers
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society, 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)