No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. By Daniel M. Butler. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 158p. $80.00 cloth, $28.99 paper.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Critical Dialogues
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016
References
Alvaredo, Facundo, Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas, and Saez, Emmanuel. 2013. “The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Andrea Louise. 2003. How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A. 2002. The macro polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, . 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, N.J. and New York: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John and Newman, Brian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence and King, Desmond. 2016. Fed Power: How Finance Wins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence and Page, Benjamin. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?” American Political Science Review. 99(February): 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence and Skocpol, Theda (eds). 2005. Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mettler, Suzanne and Soss, Joe. 2004. “The Consequences of Public Policy for Democratic Citizenship: Bridging Policy Studies and Mass Politics.” Perspectives on Politics. 1(March): 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Warren E. and Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77: 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2015. “Putting Distribution Back at the Center of Economics: Reflections on Capital in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29: 67–88, and wide-ranging commentary in this issue of JEP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The semisovereign people; a realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, B. Dan. 2009. The Myth of Presidential Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar