Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T15:40:32.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taphonomy of Tidal Flat Molluscs in the Northern Gulf of California: Paleoenvironmental Analysis despite the Perils of Preservation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Franz T. Fürsich  and
Karl W. Flessa
Franz T. Fürsich
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen, D-2800 Bremen 22, West Germany
Karl W. Flessa
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Get access

Abstract

Taphocoenoses can be powerful indicators of ancient environments, even in depositional settings in which rates of sedimentation are low and tidal currents are strong.

The rich subtropical mollusc fauna of the northern Gulf of California exhibits a distinct zonation across an extensive tidal flat at Bahia la Choya (Sonora, Mexico). The distribution of live faunas is largely controlled by substrate, energy level, availability of food, and period of submergence. Despite strong tidal currents and the effects of time-averaging, the distribution of taphocoenoses closely reflects the distribution of the live communities. Indeed, the zonation of individual species is often reflected in the distribution of their shelly remains.

The outer flat, middle flat, inner flat, tidal channel, and salt marsh subenvironments within the tidal flat complex can be defined by the taxonomic composition, trophic/life habit groups and taphonomic attributes of their taphocoenoses. Gastropods dominate on hard and firm substrates (rocky flats, channel and marsh) while bivalves prevail on sandy substrates. Herbivores are most common on rocky and shelly substrates; detritus feeders occur on the firm substrates of the inner flat and marsh; suspension-feeders predominate in sandy and rocky bottoms. Shell abrasion, encrustation and boring decrease landward.

We tested an integrated approach to paleoenvironmental analysis by examining a Pleistocene shell bed from Bahia la Choya. Taxonomic, ecologic and taphonomic criteria suggest deposition by a storm event in a very shallow subtidal to lowest intertidal environment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Paleontological Society Special Publications , Volume 2: Paleoecology and Taphonomy of Pleistocene to Recent Intertidal Deposits, Gulf of California , 1987 , pp. 200 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aberhan, M. 1987. Paläokologie, Taphonomie und Ablagerungsraum spätpleistozäner Sedimente in der Umgebung von Bahia la Choya, nordlicher Golf von Kalifornien (Mexiko). , University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
Antia, D.D.J. 1977. A comparison of diversity and trophic nuclei of live and dead molluscan faunas from the Essex Chenier Plain, England. Paleobiology, 3: 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadée, G.C. 1968. Molluscan biocoenoses and thanatocoenoses in the Ria de Arosa, Galicia, Spain. Zoologische Verhandelingen, no. 95, p. 1–121.Google Scholar
Carthew, R. and Bosence, D. 1986. Community preservation in Recent shell-gravels, English Channel. Palaeontology, 29: 243–268.Google Scholar
Dodd, J.R. and Stanton, R.J. Jr. 1981. Paleoecology, Concepts and Applications. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 559 p.Google Scholar
Feige, A. 1987. Taphonomie rezenter und pleistozäner Mollusken und ihre Bedeutung fur die Rekonstruktion von Ablagerungsraumen (Bahia la Choya, nordlicher Golf von Kalifornien, Mexiko). , University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
Fürsich, F.T. and Heinberg, C.H. 1983. Sedimentology, biostratinomy, and palaeoecology of an Upper Jurassic offshore sand bar complex. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 32: 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertlein, L.G. and Emerson, W.K. 1956. Marine Pleistocene invertebrates from near Puerto Penasco, Sonora, Mexico. Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History, 12: 154–175.Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. 1979. Community paleoecology as an epiphenomenal science. Paleobiology, 5: 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvinen, O., Babin, C., Bambach, R.K., Flügel, E., Fürsich, F.T., Futuyma, D.J., Niklas, K.J., Panchen, A.L., Simberloff, D., Underwood, A.J. and Weidich, K.F. 1986. The neontologico-paleontological interface of community evolution: How do the pieces in the kaleidoscopic biosphere move? in Raup, D.M. and Jablonski, D., eds., Patterns and processes in the history of life: Dahlem Konferenzen, LifeSciences Research Report 36, Berlin, Springer, p. 331–350.Google Scholar
Johnson, R.G. 1970. Variations in diversity within benthic marine communities. American Naturalist, 104: 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, A.M. 1971. Seashells of Tropical West America (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 1064 p.Google Scholar
Keen, A.M. and Coan, E. 1976. “Sea Shells of Tropical West America”: Additions and Corrections to 1975 (2nd ed.). The Western Society of Malacologists, Occasional Paper 1, 80 p.Google Scholar
Kidwell, S.M., Fürsich, F.T. and Aigner, T. 1986. Conceptual framework for the analysis and classification of fossil concentrations. Palaios, 1: 228–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meldahl, K. H. 1987. Sedimentologic, and taphonomic implications of biogenic stratification. Palaios, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, A.A. 1961. Mollusks of the tropical eastern Pacific, particularly from the southern half of the Panamic-Pacific faunal province (Panama to Peru). Panamic-Pacific Pelecypoda. Paleontological Research Institute, Ithaca, New York, 574 p.Google Scholar
Ortlieb, L. 1984. Pleistocene high stands of sea level and vertical movements in the Gulf of California area, in Malpica-Cruz, V., Celis, , Gutierrez, S., Guerrero-Garcia, J., and Ortlieb, L. (eds.), Neotectonics and Sea Level Variations in the Gulf of California Area, A Symposium. Instituto de Geologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Peterson, C.H. 1976. Relative abundance of living and dead molluscs in two California lagoons. Lethaia, 9: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, C.H. 1977. The paleoecological significance of undetected short-term temporal variability. Journal of Paleontology, 51: 976–981.Google Scholar
Powell, E.N. and Stanton, R.J. Jr. 1985. Estimating biomass and energy flow of molluscs in palaeocommunities. Palaeontology, 28: 1–35.Google Scholar
Quenstedt, W. 1927. Beitrage zum Kapitel Fossil und Sediment vor und bei der Einbettung. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Beilagen-Band 58 B: 353–432.Google Scholar
Reineck, H.-E. and Singh, I.B. 1980. Depositional Sedimentary Environments, (2nd ed.). Springer, Berlin, 549 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, M.W. 1975. Sedimentology of Estero la Cholla, northwest coast of Sonora, Mexico. , University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 99 p.Google Scholar
Schödlbauer, S. 1987. Okologie und Taphonomie intertidaler Molluskenfaunen von Bahia la Choya, nordlicher Golf von Kalifornien, Mexiko. , University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
Scott, R.W. 1978. Approaches to trophic analysis of paleocommunities. Lethaia, 7: 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seilacher, A. 1973. Biostratinomy: The sedimentology of biologically standardized particles, in Ginsburg, R.N., ed., Evolving Concepts in Sedimentology. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, p. 159–177.Google Scholar
Speyer, S.E. and Brett, C.E. 1986. Trilobite taphonomy and Middle Devonian taphofacies. Palaios, 1: 312–327.Google Scholar
Staff, G.M., Stanton, R.J. Jr., Powell, E.N. and Cummings, H. 1986. Time-averaging, taphonomy, and their impact on paleocommunity reconstruction: Death assemblages in Texas bays. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 97: 428–443.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanton, E.N. and Nelson, P.C. 1980. Reconstruction of the trophic web in paleontology: community structure in the Stone City Formation (Middle Eocene, Texas). Journal of Paleontology, 54: 118–135.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.A., Mead, A.R., and Schreiber, J.R. Jr. 1969. Environmental impact of brine effluents on Gulf of California. United States Department of Interior, Research and Progress Report No. 387.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.A. 1987. 1987 Tide Calendar for the Northern Gulf of California. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Warme, J.E. 1971. Paleoecological aspects of a modern coastal lagoon. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 87, 131 p.Google Scholar
Warme, J.E., Ekdale, A.A., Ekdale, S.F. and Peterson, C.H. 1976. Raw material of the fossil record. in Scott, R.W. and West, R.R., eds., Structure and Classification of Paleocommunities. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, p. 143–169.Google Scholar